EU Amsterdam turns on its sex punters - Its red light district has been an unmitigated disaster


By Julie Bindel
April 12, 2023


1.jpg

“If the Dutch government wants to groom millions of men every year into treating women like pieces of meat, Amsterdam is the best training ground they could possibly have.”

Anja, runs a support and advocacy service for women wishing to escape window prostitution in Amsterdam, and she sees the devastating effect that legalising prostitution has had on women, locals — and on punters. It has been an unmitigated disaster.

Trafficking and pimping has increased, organised crime is rife, and women are not protected from violence. Research from 2018 found that 97% of those involved in prostitution in the Netherlands had experienced some form of serious physical and/or sexual abuse from pimps and punters. Residents, politicians, police and prostitutes are all up in arms. And the sex tourists keep coming.

Yet the government, as I have discovered from 20 years of reporting on the Dutch sex trade, tends to favour the head-in-the-sand approach. Politicians are reluctant to openly criticise the industry because they make a lot of money from it. “Sex clubs, sex shows, sex shops and coffee shops all have a vested interest in keeping window prostitution going,” says Else Iping, a retired politician who lives locally, “because the windows act as an advertisement for the whole district.”

“The neighbourhood is going down the drain because of the window prostitution,” she says. “And it is not safe for the women. The windows themselves are now just as much of a tourist attraction — so thousands of people come to walk through. It’s humiliating: the women are like animals in the zoo.”

The progressive female Mayor of Amsterdam, Femke Halsema, is trying to compromise. She describes the situation as the paradox of tolerance: “People come to Amsterdam because of the tolerance but show behaviour we cannot tolerate, behaviour we should call immoral, that they wouldn’t show at home.”

Having legalised prostitution, however, and opened its arms to sex tourists, the city is now trying to put the genie back in the bottle as residents complain of the noise, crime and expense. New rules have been introduced regarding the brothels: they will have to close at 3am at weekends instead of 6am. And there are plans to relocate 100 of De Wallen’s 249 famous window brothels to an “erotic centre“ on the outskirts of the city. Somewhere “chic”, says Halsema.

But this is to close a blind eye to the fact that the entire city is promoting “prostitution on an industrial scale”, says Anja, a former prostitute. “The government wants to shove the women out of the way to keep the residents happy, but it is just moving the problem elsewhere.” And while the women are there, the sex tourists will still come.

It’s hardly surprising that a particularly problematic group of tourists — British men aged 18-34 — sees the destination as an attractive one. In a rather naive attempt to put them off, a “Stay Away” video campaign was launched last month. Those using internet search terms such as “stag party Amsterdam” or “pub crawl Amsterdam” will be diverted to a video campaign that details “the risks and consequences of nuisance and excessive alcohol and drug use”.

A 30-second video shows a very drunk man being arrested on the streets of Amsterdam. He is handcuffed and warned that coming to Amsterdam for a “messy night” and getting trashed will add up to a €140 fine plus a criminal record, so: Stay Away! Another shows a hospitalised man on a heart monitor, getting IV fluids. “Coming for drugs to Amsterdam? Stay Away!”

But I have interviewed dozens of British punters, including many in Amsterdam, and let’s face it, a video of a bloke being thrown in jail isn’t going to register, let alone act as a deterrent. One interviewee who paid for sex in Amsterdam told me, in harrowing detail, about his transaction. “She told me her pimp watched every punter leave the joint, and if he looked unhappy, she got a leathering,” he said.

Men in De Wallen have no respect for the women they ogle. They take photographs of those perched behind the window, despite the many signs telling them that it’s prohibited. They flash their genitals at the prostituted women and shout obscenities towards women walking through the area. A 2018 campaign to stop sex tourists urinating, defecating and vomiting in the streets was deemed a failure by local politicians. “Nothing seems to deter them,” a city prosecutor told me at the time.

Renate van der Zee, a journalist and feminist activist, tells me there’s a Dutch saying that describes this campaign perfectly: dweilen met de kraan open. It means “mopping the floor dry while the tap is still running”. The Stay Away campaign is too little, and far too late, she says. “You can’t deal with sexual exploitation and excess tourism by warning the men they will be put in prison,” she says. “But at least if window prostitution was abolished, you will get rid of most of the sex tourists.” Legalisation, she explains, has been a huge mistake. “Almost all of the women are exploited.”

The mayor holds, at best, a disingenuous position. She talks of “sex entrepreneurs” and their business model in one breath, and in the next: “What we do not welcome is people who come here on a vacation from morals.” Meanwhile, the Dutch government clings to its legalised regime despite knowing that the situation is becoming increasingly dangerous for women: the Netherlands was forced to close an increasing number of its window brothels after it became clear that organised criminals were running them.

As Diederik Boomsma, leader of the local Christian Democratic Appeal Party, points out: “What I have tried to achieve for many years is to close down the red light district. It’s quite bizarre that you can defend it. People are still attached to this faux romantic idea that prostitution belongs in Amsterdam, and it is quaint and old, but at least we should all agree that prostitution should not be a tourist attraction?” He believes that nothing will change unless serious steps are taken to close down the industry. “Men come here and they think that they are able to behave as though they were at a sex festival… So if you really want to do something about it, then you shut the window brothels, and the sex clubs, and return the oldest part of the city back to the citizens.”

Obviously, there are those in Amsterdam who are against the restrictions. At a meeting about the mega brothels at the weekend, angry locals who don’t want a “sex club” on their doorstep found themselves on the same side as PROUD, the Dutch “sex workers’ union” who want the women to stay in their red neon booths, where they can “work safely”.

PROUD, along with the progressive Left, insists that selling sex is a “job like any other” and that reforms against sex tourism are increasing stigma towards women. Its website has a front page devoted to a quote from Xaviera Hollander, one of Holland’s most notorious pimps who coined the term “happy hooker”. “You can call me mercenary, or call me madam, but, as I always tell my customers — just call me anytime!” Presumably with that in mind, PROUD opposes earlier closing times for brothels as well as the Stay Away campaign on the grounds that this is bad for business. They insist that they are being unfairly discriminated against and “used as a scapegoat for the city’s problem with mass tourism”.

I ask Anja whether sex tourists in Amsterdam are being unfairly vilified. “These men are the worst, and they have made Amsterdam into one big brothel,” she tells me. “Most of them act as if they are buying a burger, and quite frankly they would treat one better than they treat the girls in those windows.”
 
Government once again flummoxed that they got more of something instead of less of it by subsidizing it.
 
But a bunch of OF whores have told me that this is a wonderful model and everywhere should be like it. Could they be wrong?
 
NOOOOOO commodifying humanity's most powerful bonding ritual and reducing intersexual relations to a passing transaction is cool and good! this must be the chuds' fault NOOOOOO
 
Man, it's almost like liberalism/sin has consequences.

Edit/also:
>It’s hardly surprising that a particularly problematic group of tourists — British men aged 18-34 — sees the destination as an attractive one
Anglic filth strikes again.
 
group of tourists — British men aged 18-34
of course british tourist are the main reason for this. they will ruin anything.
People come to Amsterdam because of the tolerance but show behaviour we cannot tolerate, behaviour we should call immora
something about letting in people to your country who dont share you same values and culture.
“If the Dutch government wants to groom millions of men every year into treating women like pieces of meat, Amsterdam is the best training ground they could possibly have.”
Men in De Wallen have no respect for the women they ogle.
yes, people have said this before, but sex work isnt empowering, it is dehumanizing for women, it is literally turning them into sex objects for coomers to leer at. and yeah these men dont respect women, you have made them view women as nothing more than a walking fleshlight who will shake her ass for the price of a cheeseburger, what is respectable about that?
 
Even after they ban it leftists will claim that legalizing prostitution is a good idea and no true legalization has been attempted.
 
I don't give a shit what people do with their bodies or their money. If it however starts to inconvenience everyone else, that's the issue.
 
>Turn your women into whores.
>Create massive vice industry promoted at home and abroad
>"Our women are being dehumanised as whores! Our cities are filled with people looking for vice industries!"


Cause and effect seem to elude the political class, truly.
 
Not that the RLD isn't a pit of slav women forced into whoredom at knifepoint, but this is the usual Julie Bindel fare - a couple anecdotal quotes surrounded by wild assumptions and no statistical evidence for those assumptions or anecdotes.
 
Who would have guessed that legalizing everything and tying the hands of the police could lead to problems.



It’s humiliating: the women are like animals in the zoo.

I don't know about everything else, how much is true and how much is hype.. but reading things like this make me less inclined to take her at face value. This is too close to radfem talking points. The same types of arguments we see with anything sexy.
 
yes, people have said this before, but sex work isnt empowering, it is dehumanizing for women, it is literally turning them into sex objects for coomers to leer at. and yeah these men dont respect women, you have made them view women as nothing more than a walking fleshlight who will shake her ass for the price of a cheeseburger, what is respectable about that?
Might as well ask Bob Chipman to respect the box his Big Mac came in.

I don't know about everything else, how much is true and how much is hype.. but reading things like this make me less inclined to take her at face value. This is too close to radfem talking points. The same types of arguments we see with anything sexy.
The fact it's presented as some kind of eye-opening revelation is what gives me pause. Like, anyone with half a brain and an understanding of logic should be able to see that when you put women in a public enclosure, people will gawk.... what did you think would happen?

Acting like this is some totally unforeseeable quirk of humanity that couldn't have been planned for makes you look dumb, and your cause to look dumb by comparison, even if it had valid points you were getting to.....

Very similar to SJWs and Journos crying over a "young man" gunned down in the street who "had his life ahead of him" while omitting the part about him getting shot because he was trying to stab a man for his wallet, and equating the lack of empathy on the public's part as down to racism.

Every one of these "articles" undermines itself by acting as if the audience are aliens visiting the planet and don't know how to objectively grade human actions or morals.

You can come right out and say "enabling vice only caused crime to go up" instead of fruitlessly pulling at random heartstrings. once it becomes a semantics debate, you will lose against those who want degeneracy more than you want law and order.

First they came for the coomers but I did not speak out because I'm not a coomer it was about time.
I like this version better.
 
Última edición:
They shouldn't have added the sleeze quarter to Amsterdam, it ruins what is otherwise a fine city.

On the other hand, you got what you deserved for trying to tap into the McDonald's of tourists.
 
Amsterdam has a ton of legal nonsense wrapped up in the way these things were supposedly "legalised". There's all sorts of pitfalls and loop-holes in their system, that effectively enables the kind of visible-prostitution enabled by organised crime that they're talking about.

Cannabis in Amsterdam is a great example of how fucking retarded their system is. It's legal for me to buy it in a cafe, it's legal for me to smoke it in that cafe. It's not legal for the cafe to grow cannabis, and it's not legal for that cafe to purchase wholesale quantities. All the cannabis purchased by the cafe, for resale to customers, is considered illegal until it's physically on the shop premises itself.

If you're going to go down the legalisation route, this is probably the absolute worst way to go about it.
 
I don't know about everything else, how much is true and how much is hype.. but reading things like this make me less inclined to take her at face value. This is too close to radfem talking points. The same types of arguments we see with anything sexy.
If you ever accidentally walk through the red light district at 10am on a Sunday - women posing in their underwear in front of floor to ceiling windows and workers hosing down the pavement outside, as families wander through pushing children in buggies - you'll see the zoo comparison really isn't far off.
 
What I want to know is why should I care. Sure it's an eyesore for more puritanical types and a tragedy for the naive but it's also a worthwhile relief for young men and women who need to take a break and indulge themselves in our hectic modern world and a boon in tax dollars even if you fill the jails with subhuman br*toids. I say the red light district should be expanded and the hookers should just get a better pimp.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo