American Impeachment/25th Amendment Watch 2021 - If, at first, you don't convict, try, try again

[Extreme Aneurysm]

Yes , Without a Doubt accept the Global Hobo agenda you better have prep. Anntifa / BLM is above the law / Political tool.

No first vote say Ron Paul vote was a fake vote that throw normies suppresent say don't attacl me I am on your side
Ver archivo adjunto 1908481Ver archivo adjunto 1908484
Thanks Secret Watcher

I tried to read what you said and you're actually retarded. At least pretend you know how grammar works.

 

[KonradCruise]

I'm a little surprised Twitter isn't more involved in all this. Anything impeachment doesn't show up higher than 10th on trending, and there's two woke tags ahead of it. Half of the trends beating impeachment have less than 8k tweets.

Ver archivo adjunto 1908940

Lol david zogbot riding the clout his dead mass shooting victim friends gave him to start competition to MyPillow out of spite, we are only on the second month of 2021 and its full circus.
Rolling for david hogg bankruptcy and suicide by June.

 

[Terrifik]

I tried to read what you said and you're actually retarded. At least pretend you know how grammar works.

Thanks for trying .
Just tallking about Ran Paul vote saying everyone knew the vote did not follow the Constitution.
He was about right 56/45

Rand Paul calls impeachment 'dead on arrival' after most Republicans signal that trial is unconstitutional

The Senate tabled an effort by Sen. Rand Paul Tuesday to force a vote on the constitutionality of former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial, but the vote offered an indicator for how Republican senators -- who overwhelmingly voted for Paul's measure -- feel about the trial.

www.cnn.com

Rest Sped posting about 2020 Riots
Thanks Extreme Aneurysm

 

[MembersSchoolPizza]

So I didn't get to watch any of it today, and to be honest I've just been sort of sick of the whole mess. So I confess ignorance with this question.

I've seen some of the lawspergs on the 'tube saying this whole thing is unconstitutional. Which I gather was rejected today. What was the argument, in brief?

 

[Zeta Reticulan]

these retards think

That's where you're wrong kiddo.

 

[Spiteful Crow]

I'm not watching this shit show. So i'm just looking here to see what happens.
I was wondering if there was threadbhere for this. I almost forgot today was the day.

Honestly I wasn't really a fan of Trump 2024. I'm more hoping we get the new and prove Ted Cruz for 2024. It's amazing Trump was able to turn one of his competitors on the debate stage into his prodigy that takes skill my friends.

I like Trump. It just even without impeachment. I'm not a fan of giving people who are 80 something years old political power. At that point just retire

He's been looking good lately. He went from the nose picker to a real chad I guess

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

Has a friend say the whole "Police and law enforcement came out of slave patrols" on me today.

Three questions got them to shut up.

>Do you know who Robin Hood was?
"Yeah, duh."
>When was it?
"Around the Crusades."
>Who was his foe?
"The Sheriff of.... oh."

 

[XtrmGamr719]

Has a friend say the whole "Police and law enforcement came out of slave patrols" on me today.

Three questions got them to shut up.

>Do you know who Robin Hood was?
"Yeah, duh."
>When was it?
"Around the Crusades."
>Who was his foe?
"The Sheriff of.... oh."

The fact you had to bring up a historical/mythical figure to prove your point makes me sad.

 

[TFT-A9]

The fact you had to bring up a historical/mythical figure to prove your point makes me sad.

remember that most of these morons know shit from Shinola about history that isn't fucking tarted-up pop-history bullcrap, if you want to communicate with them you have to know their language

 

[Penis Drager]

The fact you had to bring up a historical/mythical figure to prove your point makes me sad.

The fact that he went posting about it on here makes me think that's not exactly how the conversation went.

 

[Terrifik]

So I didn't get to watch any of it today, and to be honest I've just been sort of sick of the whole mess. So I confess ignorance with this question.

I've seen some of the lawspergs on the 'tube saying this whole thing is unconstitutional. Which I gather was rejected today. What was the argument, in brief?

About Same
1.unconstitutional
2.kangeroo court
3. 1st amendment speech
4.what about 2020 riots
5.riot speech memeber of congress
6. i am not offical & just private citizen
7.nullify 2016-2020 history & 1st impeachment

 

[AnOminous]

I love how these fags opened with a voluminous, tedious argument about how this trial is probably actually Constitutional. It probably actually is. That doesn't erase the fact that it is FUCKING RETARDED.

 

[HumanHive]

Has a friend say the whole "Police and law enforcement came out of slave patrols" on me today.

Three questions got them to shut up.

>Do you know who Robin Hood was?
"Yeah, duh."
>When was it?
"Around the Crusades."
>Who was his foe?
"The Sheriff of.... oh."

Really law enforcement/governments originate from a mafia proto-government. What starts as a band of hooligans becomes a protection racket which slowly morphs into something authoritarian but responsible.

When did Republicans become so content with being jobbers all the time?

Since always.
They're more comfortable in the minority opposition role. It means they don't have to fulfill any of their promises but still get invited to various DC parties.

 

[Random Internet Person]

Since always.
They're more comfortable in the minority opposition role. It means they don't have to fulfill any of their promises but still get invited to various DC parties.

How long can it go? I’m pretty in other left wing hotspots like China and North Korea, once the left gains office, they crush all the opposition until there’s no more, not even controlled. How long before that aspect of the left is enacted in America?

 

[Reporterward]

The less legitimate the regime, the more outrageous are the abuses of power.
Does it seem like Biden and Co. are confident in their “historic” Nov. 4 victory?

Oh shit I forgot Alaska has a weird political system. Becuase I'm pretty sure if was in a normal senate seats. She would have been primary a long time ago.

Apologies if this has been said already.
Merkowski has actually already been primaried before. She just ran as a write-in because fuck election results.
And yes, Alaska’s political system is an absolute clusterfuck.

Copy/pasta warning.

She was appointed to the U.S. Senate by her father, who resigned his seat in December 2002 to become governor of Alaska. Murkowski completed her father's unexpired Senate term, which ended in January 2005.

Murkowski ran for and won a full term in 2004. After losing the 2010 Republican primary to Tea Party candidate Joe Miller, Murkowski ran as a write-in candidate and defeated both Miller and the Democrat shit stain in the general election.

 

[ditto]

Ver archivo adjunto 1908518Ver archivo adjunto 1908519Ver archivo adjunto 1908520Ver archivo adjunto 1908521Ver archivo adjunto 1908522Ver archivo adjunto 1908523Ver archivo adjunto 1908524Ver archivo adjunto 1908526

Like it or not, this is effective communication and strategy. Where is the Trump / populist version of this, with demands and legislation?

 

[ForTheHoard]

Like it or not, this is effective communication and strategy. Where is the Trump / populist version of this, with demands and legislation?

Whoever makes that list is gonna end up on a list.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Like it or not, this is effective communication and strategy. Where is the Trump / populist version of this, with demands and legislation?

The problem with that is that if you do try something like that, you’ll likely get banned. This stuff would only work on social media that’s not controlled by Big Tech.

 

[A_throwaway_name62919]

A thought crossed my mind. Since the senate gave the go-ahead in saying this latest impeachment is """"""""""constitutional,"""""""""" does that also open up past living presidents to get the same treatment? Of course, it'd be highly improbable to happen because the hologram's administration would do everything to make sure Obama, Dubya, Clinton, and even Carter remain untouchable until the days they die. But the precedent may or may not have been set by this farce, yeah?

Nah. Precedent was set back in 1876 when Secretary of War William Belknap tried to resign just before Congress voted to impeach him for corruption. The Senate didn't let that stop them from trying him for corruption. This extends the precedent a bit from cabinet members to presidents but isn't exactly an earth shattering change. We probably would have had the same thing happen with Nixon if Ford hadn't pardoned him. You'll still pretty much need a president to have 1) done something impeachable while they were in office, 2) have impeachment proceedings start against them before they leave office.

 

[Terrifik]

Youtube being youtube again

Excuting code delet anything related January 6th footage