🐱 ABC drops Roseanne show after racist tweet

CatParty
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/roseanne-canceled-abc-1202824211/

ABC has pulled the plug on the revival “Roseanne.”

The move comes after series star Roseanne Barr made a comment on Twitter Tuesday morning referring to former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett as the offspring of the “Muslim Brotherhood & Planet of the Apes.”

“Roseanne’s Twitter statement is abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values, and we have decided to cancel her show,” ABC Entertainment president Channing Dungey said in a statement.

Barr deleted her tweet about Jarrett not long after posting it. She followed it up with an apology which read, “I apologize to Valerie Jarrett and to all Americans. I am truly sorry for making a bad joke about her politics and her looks. I should have known better. Forgive me-my joke was in bad taste. I am now leaving Twitter.”

The revival of the classic sitcom was set to air a 13-episode eleventh season this fall. The move represents a remarkable turn of events for the network, Barr, and a show that finished the season as the No. 1 scripted primetime television series in the 18-49 demo, according to Nielsen live-plus-same say numbers.





Just two weeks ago at ABC’s upfront presentation, Barr introduced Disney-ABC Television Group president Ben Sherwood, joking that he was “the guy responsible for most of my tweets.” Sherwood and Barr hugged onstage, and the the exec noted that ABC had not had television’s No. 1 show in 24 years. Dungey, during her portion of the presentation, bragged that “The premiere ratings even took us by surprise,” claiming that 1 in 10 Americans has seen the “Roseanne” revival premiere.

More to come…
 
Última edición:
The 90's sure had a shitload of cartoons revolving around frumpy middle-aged comedians. The only one I enjoyed was Life with Louie, though.

I just thought the kids having adult voices was creepy as Hell.

The only exception to that was Bruce Willis' cartoon, the creepiest thing about that was the CGI Bruce.
 
The 90's sure had a shitload of cartoons revolving around frumpy middle-aged comedians. The only one I enjoyed was Life with Louie, though.
Seemed like every celeb had to have a cartoon at some point in the 90's. Reminded of Rodney Dangerfield having an animated film where he played a dog for instance.

I just thought the kids having adult voices was creepy as Hell.
Even if that's been such an industry standard for decades to get grown-ups for kid roles. Of course then you look into the histories of some actors and it's pretty telling how they got their roles like Dick Beals or Walter Tetley.

Of course I'm sure plenty remember Howie Mandel and his Bobby's World series. At least that tried to sound convincing as a little boy voice than the way Louie Anderson tried with his "Louie" voice.

The only exception to that was Bruce Willis' cartoon, the creepiest thing about that was the CGI Bruce.
I think that was "Bruno The Kid".
 
The idea that Roseanne could be brought back if Barr is removed shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

As much as the network bitches, the show was broadcasted to bring in nine billion in sponsors. It also was likely to be the third highest watched show on the network.

It is also an incredibly easy fix. Roseanne went for surgery, she died. They either deal with the death issue in the first episode and move on or just do a time jump a year down the road.

Valerie's Family killed off Valerie in an off screen car crash. The Hogan Family was successful without Valerie Harper. Jason Bateman being popular with tween and teen girls probably had a lot to do with it though. Trying to get it to work with Roseanne shouldn't be too hard. Valerie Harper had been popular and she had more successful series both starring and supporting than the one Roseanne is known for. But they replaced her with Sandy Duncan, who was very likable. I don't think that they could replace Roseanne though. Instead let an existing character like Jackie take over the lead female role. I always liked Jackie more anyway.

However, I don't see it happening. I don't think the network is going to look at Roseanne and go "This can work without Roseanne". Although I could be wrong. It's not that I didn't like her character. It's just that I always thought Dan, Jackie and the kids shined a little brighter than she did.

Cause that worked so well for Kevin James's new-
Ver archivo adjunto 464840

Well.

I think they thought Leah Remini would save the show and trick people into thinking maybe it was a sequel to The King of Queens. According to Wikipedia the reviews were never that strong to begin with. They didn't handle the wife's death well or even bother to properly explain it and made it into a joke. This didn't sit well. Honestly, they should have just rebooted The King of Queens since Remini was coming on board anyway. By the end of Season 2 Kevin Can Wait was down to 5.45 million viewers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Can_Wait

Look at that decline. People tuned in for the season 2 premiere for Remini then it dropped down into the abyss once more. Guess she couldn't save it. You can see from the ratings for season 1 that it's a miracle it even got a season 2. I think Roseanne was definitely poised to do way better. But the star of the show had to go and sink her own battleship.
 
The spin-off's a go:
Hollywood Reporter dijo:
Weeks after its stunning decision to cancel Roseanne, ABC is officially moving forward with a spinoff of TV's current No. 1 series — without controversial star Roseanne Barr.

Following aggressive talks with exec producer Tom Werner, the Disney-owned broadcaster has handed out a 10-episode, straight-to-series order for Roseanne spinoff The Conners (working title). The new take, which will also be a multicamera comedy and premiere in the fall, will follow the Conner family who, after a sudden turn of events, are forced to face the daily struggles of life in Lanford in a way they never have before.

ABC stressed in its announcement Thursday that former star Barr will have no financial or creative involvement in the new series. Werner and Barr reached an agreement that will allow Werner Entertainment to produce the spinoff for ABC without Barr’s further creative or financial participation. Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that Barr will retain all rights to her Roseanne Conner character and any future spinoffs beyond The Conners or any future reboots of the original.

"I regret the circumstances that have caused me to be removed from Roseanne. I agreed to the settlement in order that 200 jobs of beloved cast and crew could be saved, and I wish the best for everyone involved,” Barr said in a statement. Added Werner: “We are grateful to have reached this agreement to keep our team working as we continue to explore stories of the Conner family.”

Roseanne stars John Goodman, Laurie Metcalf, Sara Gilbert, Lecy Goranson and Michael Fishman will star in the spinoff. Additional castmembers and a premiere date will be announced at a later date. "We have received a tremendous amount of support from fans of our show, and it’s clear that these characters not only have a place in our hearts, but in the hearts and homes of our audience," Goodman, Metcalf, Gilbert, Goranson and Fishman said in a joint statement. "We all came back last season because we wanted to tell stories about the challenges facing a working-class family today. We are so happy to have the opportunity to return with the cast and crew to continue to share those stories through love and laughter.”

ABC says the new take will explore issues with parenthood, dating an unexpected pregnancy, financial pressures, aging and in-laws in working-class America. The series will take over Roseanne's Tuesdays at 8 p.m. time slot. The Conners hails from the creative team behind what was to be the 11th season of Roseanne, including showrunner Bruce Helford, Gilbert, Dave Caplan, Bruce Rasmussen and Tony Hernandez. The series hails from Werner and Werner Entertainment.

"The Conners’ stories demonstrate that families can always find common ground through conversation, laughter and love. The spinoff will continue to portray contemporary issues that are as relevant today as they were 30 years ago,” ABC said in a statement.

Despite multiple reports that the network was open to a new take on Roseanne, the decision to move forward with a new version of the series should still be seen as a surprise, given the considerable obstacles that had to be overcome in order to move forward.

A major point of contention was to find a way to reinvent Roseanne that would not financially benefit Barr, which was said to be a top demand from ABC Entertainment president Channing Dungey and Werner. The series was created by Matt Williams (the show's first showrunner, who departed in season one after clashing with the actress) and is based upon a character (yes, singular) created by Barr.

As THR previously reported, Barr had agreed in principle to walk away from the characters she helped create in order to allow the cast and crew to pursue a spinoff. But since Barr would be entitled to substantial fees and backend on a Roseanne spinoff, the actress had to waive those rights before a new take could move forward. The last key hurdle was over what, if any, one-time payment Barr was to receive as "go-away money," as one source put it. Barr will retain an executive producer credit on the new take, per WGA rules.

Talks to continue the series heated up almost immediately following the cancellation after exec producer Werner, whose Carsey-Werner banner produced the original series and the 10th season, became highly engaged in finding a new path forward. (Werner's longtime partner, Marcy Carsey, recently said that she would not try to revive the comedy following its cancellation.)

The move to breathe new life into the franchise comes as Disney was on the hook to pay stars Gilbert (who plays Darlene), Metcalf (Jackie) and Goodman (Dan) for the since-scrapped 11th season. The trio, along with Barr, negotiated new deals for the 13-episode season at $300,000 per episode (up from $250,000 for season 10). They expected to be paid for at least 10 episodes since their options were exercised. What was less clear was if and how the writing staff, including showrunner Helford, were to be compensated.

Following the cancellation, ABC found itself in a unique position. Roseanne was due to return in the fall and open the network's Tuesday lineup as ABC was briefly poised to head into the 2018-19 broadcast season without TV's top show and without a new series from Shonda Rhimes (Grey's Anatomy, Scandal) for the first time in years. Roseanne was expected to drive at least $60 million in ad revenue for its 11th season, according to Kantar Media. ABC, sources said, may have been on the hook for "tens of millions of dollars" after axing the series.

ABC on May 29 canceled Roseanne after Barr's racist tweet directed at Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to former President Barack Obama. The star, who has been an outspoken advocate for President Donald Trump, later apologized and said she "begged" Disney-ABC TV Group president Ben Sherwood not to cancel the series. (ABC declined comment on that at the time, though multiple sources within the network contend that conversation never happened and Barr has since deleted that tweet.)

In a memo to staff following the cancellation, Sherwood apologized to the then-unemployed staff of Roseanne and expressed hope that the network could find a way to work together down the road. The new incarnation of Roseanne saved those jobs as staffing season had already been completed for all the broadcast series and many involved with the production turned down other jobs to stay with the comedy.

Roseanne was slated to return in the fall for an expanded 11th season of 13 episodes as ABC looked to build on the show's momentum. In a victory lap of sorts, Barr was the centerpiece of ABC's upfront presentation to Madison Avenue ad buyers in May. (Barr joked in introducing Sherwood onstage that he was the man behind her Twitter feed.) The revival was part of a larger effort by Dungey — broadcast's lone African-American network topper — to cater to the underserved community who turned out in force to elect Trump. The success of the Roseanne revival has prompted other broadcast networks to pick up a wave of multicamera comedies in a larger push to program for middle America. (To that end, Fox revived Tim Allen comedy Last Man Standing a year after ABC's cancellation.)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/roseanne-spinoff-conners-officially-a-go-at-abc-1117397
 
It's almost like the producers at ABC realized it was a dumb as fuck idea to get rid of a show that had the highest ratings on their channel.
 
Yesterday, she posted a bizarre video in which she grows unhinged and screams "I thought the bitch was white" twice in a row. It got enough attention that it was covered by The View (and The Young Turks, though as with any TYT video I wouldn't recommend watching unless you have a remarkable tolerance for stupidity).
Then today, she posted a short statement in which she calmly explains the same thing, and claims that she told the executives the same thing to begin with and offered to go on multiple shows to clear it up. However, she claims victimhood and says that she believes that the reason that she never even got the chance to explain herself is because she supported Trump.

Most people seem to be saying that the existence of the first clip is due to her being mentally unstable. That seems possible, although considering that she was saying this from the beginning and the media refused to cover it, it seems likely that she did it this way to bait them into talking about it, since they wouldn't otherwise.
 
Última edición:
You know what- that unhinged video is the same EXACT thing that people who had traumatic brain injury do. They do stuff like this like freak out, ramble and don't make sense. I can't believe the public isn't noticing this tbh. I bet most of this is brain damage. She's mentally unstable because her brain is legit fucked up from an injury. It's kind of sad to see tbh.
Source: I know someone who has a brain injury and he noticed the signs.
 
You know what- that unhinged video is the same EXACT thing that people who had traumatic brain injury do. They do stuff like this like freak out, ramble and don't make sense. I can't believe the public isn't noticing this tbh. I bet most of this is brain damage. She's mentally unstable because her brain is legit fucked up from an injury. It's kind of sad to see tbh.
Source: I know someone who has a brain injury and he noticed the signs.

Her appearance on the Dave Rubin report not too long ago should have tipped anyone off working with her that she needed to be heavily monitored in her press and social media use, if not outright told to abstain from it.

This was sheer stupidity on the network's part and indicative of once again how little they understand the implications of internet and new media outlets.
 
Her appearance on the Dave Rubin report not too long ago should have tipped anyone off working with her that she needed to be heavily monitored in her press and social media use, if not outright told to abstain from it.

This was sheer stupidity on the network's part and indicative of once again how little they understand the implications of internet and new media outlets.
Listened to this the other day and somewhere in it she says that she actually had been instructed not to tweet at all while the show was running. She was allowed access again after the run of episodes finished and managed to immediately fuck it up.
Funnily enough, if you listen to the interview it very much seems as if Roseanne's views aren't even that far removed from modern day SJWs (she even silently agrees to the "racism=predjudice+power" definition), and only supported Trump due to all the wacko conspiracy theories that she apparently believes. Her belief that Valerie Jarrett is a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood and wrote the Iran deal seems to be one of these things, but interestingly ended up being completely overshadowed by the "planet of the apes" portion of the tweet.
I could see this being a little true since the public wouldn't shut up about that the entire time.
I actually don't even necessarily think that she's wrong here, and I do believe that the "planet of the apes" comparison was probably a cheap shot at VJ's looks made because she either truly didn't know VJ was part black or because she wasn't thinking about the other implications while high on Ambien, but the fact remains that it was still a shitty thing to tweet regardless and that she's fully responsible for her own stupidity. This isn't an isolated incident either, she has a long history of tweeting bizarre things. Bias against her due to her support for Trump probably played a part in the media's excitement to take her down, but if this had been a first time thing it would have been significantly harder to do that. The reason that she got fired so quickly was probably more due to the fact that the network had specifically instructed her to keep the crazy shit under control, and this was just the last straw.
 
I kind of think it's dumb to fire people for tweets though. Firing for sexual abuse allegations, yes. But tweets? Big deal.
 
Welp, judging by the comments, I guess mob justice has been normalised. Excellent.

Nobody should be getting fired for a stupid comment they made on twitter. Nobody. Not Roseanne, not James Gunn, not that baseball player, not Gilbert Gottfried, fucking no one. They certainly didn't bring it on themselves, that is just a post hoc rationalisation people have come up with to justify it after the fact.

I mean jesus christ, the writers and production staff didn't deserve to be punished for her stupidity? Are you fucking serious, what stupidity was that, not knowing Valerie Jarrett's ethnicity? Broadcasting politically conservative views in public?

The only people who should be for this are the humourless authoritarian cunts who exist solely to get outraged. Everyone else who supports this - against left or right wingers - is retarded.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo