2026 Belfast Riots - Will one Sudanese manage to unite Billy and Mickey?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
You'd be surprised on how much stuff we actually cover in American public schools. We did cover the troubles. God, why do Europeans think Americans are stupid? Niggers in America are stupid as fuck. But most Americans understand our own history as well as many other countries history.
The simple fact of the matter is, for some reason European identitarians don't like white Americans. Don't know why.
The reason is that Europeans and British have an internalized superiority complex over the Americas, perpetuated by media and culture (ie, the "fat stupid American redneck" trope). It drives a lot of politics, as they try to one up the USA in suicidal empathy to feel better about having lost their status as world power.
 
The United Kingdom might be uniquely well placed as a country that could undergo a sudden revolution. The state keeps its grip on power and crushes dissent almost entirely bureaucratically. What keeps people in line is the threat of having draconian, punitive sentences handed down by a judge, not any fear of a source of actual, physical power.
And, if you look at English history, there have been multiple occurrences of revolt that were resolved because the government eventually backed down. It's not widely known, for instance, that far from the stiff upper lip, keep-calm-and-carry-on myth we're sold today, London was on the verge of revolution during the blitz. The government was refusing to allow londoners to use the underground stations as bomb shelters (instead forcing them to use anderson shelters, which were entirely useless), out of a fear that they would stay down and refuse to come out and work, even while the great and good had their underground restaurants and underground offices. There were riots. People stormed the locked stations and simply took them over for the night. The government graciously announced a change of policy several days later, once it became clear the only alternative was sending in the army, which would have fomented even greater revolt.

English history has been a long series of near-revolutions that were typically (though not always; see Ireland and the highland clearances for two alternative solutions) solved by the government of the day eventually reaching out to compromise with the people. The hindsight view of it is reframed as "nothing ever happens" and "nothing changed", but that ignores all that did change, or how at the very least the government's impositions rolled back and the status quo ante was restored. That willingness to compromise and to generally leave people alone is what kept the country so stable post-cromwell, but it seems the contract was broken as part of the post-war settlement, as we've since had a succession of rulers who delight in telling people how to behave, right up to today and Starmer's temu cromwell act.

The Irish are white, immigrants as a whole are just awful—we've known this since the Tervingi crossed the Danube circa 370AD.
One of the reasons why the whole "you replaced poles with pakis you deserve everything you get!" line is so stupid. I like poles. My cousin is married to a pole. I still don't want them turning up en masse, driving down wages and displacing my culture, while they export cash to the home country. I'd feel the same way if a million swedes turned up every year.
 
Also the obvious-in-hindsight fact they were all into organised crime and like the Italians played a major role in the formation of America's crime syndicates. (See: The Irish Mob)
So yeah, immigrants tend to be shit regardless of where they're from if they're allowed to come en mass.
The Irish are white, immigrants as a whole are just awful—we've known this since the Tervingi crossed the Danube circa 370AD.
As one with that ancestry, red hair and everything, yeah pretty much. Got used for cheap labor like the spics are today in the US, and all that comes with it. Thing is almost none of that exists today. Youll get laughed at for "being Irish", thats just saying you're white here. Now it's just a cool footnote in people's 23 and me test.
 
The Irish were disliked in the USA because
In the USA they were known for corruption (Tammany Hall Bosses) since the late 1700's and displaced the original English who settled New York and Philadelphia and Boston where they set up their corrupt political machines. Also, there were all the orphanages for irish children and unmarried irish women who depended on charity and the state and sent remitences back home (sound familiar). Also, the Catholic Chruch was instrumental in getting this underclass them to America and keeping them here.

The boarding house offered food, shelter and job placement to tens of thousands of young, unmarried, Irish Catholic women who left their families in Ireland to travel by steamship to New York City in the late 1800’s.

Watson House opened in 1885 to help Irish women who arrived in New York.

The role of the church
Catholic priests often met the ships to make sure the women made it to Watson House safely.
EDIT: forgot the link https://www.fox5ny.com/news/new-york-city-irish-legacy

Also, disease

Mary Mallon (September 23, 1869 – November 11, 1938), commonly known as Typhoid Mary, was an Irish-born cook who lived in the United States from a young age and is believed to have infected up to fifty-seven people with the bacteria that cause typhoid fever. The infections caused three confirmed deaths.


Nowadays, Ireland is a paradise so immigration has mostly stopped.
 
Última edición:
listen buddy, idk what you thought I was saying but I dont care how shit my nation gets its 10 billion times better than whatever shit ass 3rd world bumpkin province you think is somehow superior

our dumbest worst boomer is better than the smartest brit

all of Europe has produced nothing but discord since 1775
1775? How about AD 476? Hilarious watching the Eurocoded posters crash and burn as the movement is gradually snuffed out and nothing changes.

Europe: thousands of years of burning buildings and people pretending to believe they have any power. Meanwhile America GDP growth go brrrrr.
 
The reason is that Europeans and British have an internalized superiority complex over the Americas, perpetuated by media and culture (ie, the "fat stupid American redneck" trope). It drives a lot of politics, as they try to one up the USA in suicidal empathy to feel better about having lost their status as world power.
Correct. If you ever really want to piss off Irish nationalists point out that not only did the Founding Fathers of Ireland. Consider Irish Americans. Part of the country, it is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. Also with because of American Irishmen that the revolution even got off the ground.
We also help the Greeks gain their independence from Turks.
 
If one tiny country would show the cucked white multitudes that yes, you actually can just exile and kill every nigger, Jew and mudslime to solve the "modernity crisis", it could be like the falling of small stones that starts an avalanche.
 
Yep. This is a regime that's gatekept power so long on ideological lines that it's now full of morons and weak faggots. Even their police and military have throttled advancement for more than a decade by conformity to the globohomo religion. It's now a government of foxes that can only enforce its will through media tricks and bureaucracy. Governments like this tend to get their jugulars cut by lions once people realize how weak they actually are.

I wouldnt even categorise them as foxes. Foxes usually try and keep order. No these guys are something new. The foxes and lions metaphor needs to add something else..the vultures. The ones thrive on decay and exist only to pick at the corpse.
 
I wouldnt even categorise them as foxes. Foxes usually try and keep order. No these guys are something new. The foxes and lions metaphor needs to add something else..the vultures. The ones thrive on decay and exist only to pick at the corpse.
Parasites? Like the ones that force ants to climb as high as they can so that they get eaten more easily?
 
And, if you look at English history, there have been multiple occurrences of revolt that were resolved because the government eventually backed down.

I don't think the current British state is capable of making concessions to its White population. I mean that literally-- even Starmer, the soulless, bureaucratic EU faggot that he his-- made an attempt at acknowledging the British peoples' anger with his "island of strangers" comments a few months ago. The response was instant rebellion from certain segments of the British bureaucracy and he almost lost his post.

Their entire government, military, police, all of it-- it's infested with the BBC/globohomo crowd, and they are religiously devoted to replacing the native British population.

I wouldnt even categorise them as foxes. Foxes usually try and keep order. No these guys are something new. The foxes and lions metaphor needs to add something else..the vultures. The ones thrive on decay and exist only to pick at the corpse.
I think they very much want to maintain order (compliance, in other words), but they're unwilling or incapable of making the sort of concessions necessary to achieve it. They're also utterly incompetent. Lammy is literally a retarded nigger. I mean, look at this. This is cartoon level regime entropy:


1781280532217.png
 
Última edición:
No. it can not. You simply cannot revoke the citizenship of tens of millions of people, many of them already second or third generation citizens. It is simply out of the realm of political possibility and placed firmly within daydreaming
Yes, you can. It's a thing, and you can do it. It's not politically correct, you're right, it's not kosher, so it would cost government the next election. Because elections are a thing too, and can do them...

Russia became USSR at one point and cancelled all debts because Russia wasn't the public thing anymore, USSR was. It had a political cost, and they paid it, less trust/trade for a generation.

Is the juice worth the squeeze? Is the political cost of losing an election worth the orthodemographic reform of citizenship? There's an English saying, fathers plant trees so that grandsons may enjoy their shade.
 
I don't think the current British state is capable of making concessions to its White population.
Yes, exactly. Too hidebound to be able to even think about bending. Whatever the next rebellion is (and I fully believe it's already here, bubbling away under the surface), the state won't be able to respond in any way that diffuses the situation, but also won't have the resources to resort to widescale violent oppression. I believe people are willing to give a peaceful solution one last try with a vote for reform or restore, but I also believe the state is going to attempt to prevent that by any means necessary. No compromise possible, so revolt becomes inevitable.
 
Yes, exactly. Too hidebound to be able to even think about bending. Whatever the next rebellion is (and I fully believe it's already here, bubbling away under the surface), the state won't be able to respond in any way that diffuses the situation, but also won't have the resources to resort to widescale violent oppression. I believe people are willing to give a peaceful solution one last try with a vote for reform or restore, but I also believe the state is going to attempt to prevent that by any means necessary. No compromise possible, so revolt becomes inevitable.
Yeah, and I can see why Belfast is freaking them out so much. Belfast is an outlier in terms of British cities, of course, and it's not really surprising that it was the first to do this. Southport was just the locals' righteous, but mostly undirected, anger-- and they were ultimately appealing to the state. Belfast is rejecting the state's legitimacy altogether. If that were to catch on, it could be proven correct very quickly.
 
ME24 account claims the Sudanese attacker had links to brutal militia called "The Butchers". The video in the tweet shows death and cannibalism.
I found something else claiming he's ex-Janjaweed. I don't really see any evidence for either but I'm not watching the cannibalism video to make sure. I do think the pictures below are probably him. One account claims to have an image of 'Yunus Alobid'. More than one comment says he speaks Arabic with an atypical accent (this one says Gulf, but I've seen others also)
Yun 0.png Yun 9.png Yun 1.png Yun 2 (1).png Yun 3 (1).png Yun 2.png Yun 3.png Yun 5 (1).jpeg Yun 4.jpeg Yun 6 (1).jpeg
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo