Yes, get out from it by establishing a superior structure of law like the Americans did, not by introducing anarchy. What due process was given to select the buildings to be burned?
The Southport riots, subsequent re-discovery of the migrant hotels, and the normalisation of explicitly anti-immigrant rhetoric were an
immense boon to the anti-immigrant proponents.
When the right-wing
weren't rioting, they wanted one thing and one thing only: fewer immigrants. Not even a complete ban on immigration altogether or closed borders, just
less. And not even
that was granted. And even when there was a ideological compromise with dumb shit like civic nationalism i.e. completely shitting over the concept of nationalism altogether to replace it with
mud. This singular demand alongside growing discontent only intensified the demand the longer it went without amelioration, and whilst I don't think there'll be RWDS or any other LARPist fantasy, we're at the point where a non-insubstantial amount of Britons want even
legals gone and it's only been 2 years since Southport.
We don't
want riots
, we
want something done about immigration.
But what do you do when the government refuses to listen, the media does its best to downplay your concerns, and the same problems keep happening over and over and over despite the simplicity of the fix? You set some shit on fire. Signal to the government they're not doing enough, and signal to other pissed off people that they're not alone.
This is such a massive whitepill and those on the right who only see this as anarchy and a optics disaster need to get that stick out of their ass and stop LARPing Evola.
