195 - If you see this thread, you must post in it.

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1585411317194.png
 
Hmm
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • IMG_20200328_091954.jpg
    IMG_20200328_091954.jpg
    41.2 KB · Vistas: 76
  • 1585297496283.jpg
    1585297496283.jpg
    49.3 KB · Vistas: 91
To express Graham's number, there's a certain number of steps. Graham's number is G[64] in this setup. But what if you went to G[65], which is 3 [G[64] # of ↑] 3? What about G [Graham's Number]? Could that be called a Graham's numberplex?

(Yet even if you reached a Graham's numberplex number of years, eternity is still just as far away as it was in 2020.)
 
Atrás
Top Abajo