What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What do you think will happen if all medical cures to diseases are taken away, deemed to be irrelevant compared to the splendour of the Jewish monster God and replaced by prayers and millions are cramped inside shanty towns with no hiygene and were taught that spiritual cleanliness is superior over bodily cleanliness (or simply nothing to begin with) for over a couple thousand years?

But for all seriousness, there is no way people are fed and paid more than an average American (especially paid) in the Medieval Era. Obviously things improve slightly during the High Medieval Era (and even poor peasants can afford pork after the black death because most of the meddlesome clergy and nobles die off) but this is decidedly not the case in the Early Middle Ages. Here's a video about the subject of food.

The romans did not quite have those ready yet. I do not doubt that judaistic worship retarded their development, but it was not as bad as often portrayed.

Even afterwards, this mortality rate was high, the doctor I linked lived in the 18th century.

Payed? It was only in the 20th century that money overtook barter in rural Hungary.

Of course they did not have infinite corn syrup. The average mutt is overfed to an extent that would make most nobles and aristocrats blush. But that is due to technology invented by White people.

Yet these selfsame wagies own as little as a serf, for what is their money for? Rent, goyslop, and consoooooom.

The serf could afford 3-4 kids on his day's minimum wage so to speak, with his wife working the house. Can the wagie say the same, with his they/dem nonbinaryfriend wagieing too?

Now this isn't as good as the late 19th early 20th century, where one man could feed and keep a whole family up.
 
Of course they did not have infinite corn syrup. The average mutt is overfed to an extent that would make most nobles and aristocrats blush. But that is due to technology invented by White people.

Yet these selfsame wagies own as little as a serf, for what is their money for? Rent, goyslop, and consoooooom.

The serf could afford 3-4 kids on his day's minimum wage so to speak, with his wife working the house. Can the wagie say the same, with his they/dem nonbinaryfriend wagieing too?

Now this isn't as good as the late 19th early 20th century, where one man could feed and keep a whole family up.
You need to understand what we are experiencing now. It is a collapsing society, not a collapsed one. There is a difference.

Obviously this will degenerate into some sort of mass extinction event where you will own literally nothing and you will be happy (aka you're being forced to commune farm vegetables and chickens on rooftops in a section 8 concentration camp ward in the woods and you're constantly put in line under the fear of death because even the slightest expression of free will and human emotions is a one way trip to the gas chamber), but we are still not near the level of unrecoverable, total collapse as seen in the early Medieval Era, Maoist China or the Khmer Rouge.

I swear that if collapse does come though, the destruction it causes will be beyond those caused by the Medieval Era.

The romans did not quite have those ready yet. I do not doubt that judaistic worship retarded their development, but it was not as bad as often portrayed.

Even afterwards, this mortality rate was high, the doctor I linked lived in the 18th century.
The Romans have medicine. Make no mistake it's not perfect but if they were given more time they could had been reached 18th to 19th century standards in like 1 or 2 centuries.

Remember that lost technology is real and currently we had just finished catching up (and invented plastic and electronics as a step further). Too bad it will all come crashing down by around this century.
 
Última edición:
reddit faggot.jpg
 
I believe a bonus reason MLK was pushed so hard was that it forged a new, fresher, stronger association with the name Martin Luther, chipping away at the cultural relevancy of traditional Christianity a little more
>Luther
>traditional Christianity

pick one
Dude I saw post only just recently of a Jewish guy flipping off the Arch of Titus with the caption of saying "Still here!" (As in, "We are still here and the Romans are gone."
That's a 1900 year grudge.
3328.jpg
 
Also the average lifespan of a commoner in the Medieval Era is 18 to 30.
That average includes high child mortality (an issue as old as the very existence of mankind), which skews the mean significantly. If you made it past your early teens you'd typically live till around 60.

Your understanding of history is marginal at best. You don't really have any grounds to be making the wild claims you're spitting out here.
 
That average includes high child mortality (an issue as old as the very existence of mankind), which skews the mean significantly. If you made it past your early teens you'd typically live till around 60.
Even when accounting with the high child mortality rate issue, you have to also consider that Medieval living conditions are much worse than living conditions in Rome or Ancient China (on a good day). An average Medieval City is also much more overcrowded and unsanitary than a Roman or Chinese one (again, on a good day so no collapsed societies). So if Rome already has a high infant mortality rate then it isn't going to be any better when everyone other than nobility and clergy are living in mud huts or shanty towns.

There's also young men dying in war left and right, which is very common since all the Frankish states go to war with each other all the time and it's the easiest way for young Medieval men to make a living in some form or sense. To say nothing that hygiene diseases were much more common in the Medieval Era and peaked at the Black Death.

So I am not surprised if there's lots of excess deaths amongst the statistics.
 
Última edición:
The reactions to the SOTU are perfect examples of how badly these political elite have damaged and divided people. The use of the standing ovations was to divide both parties cleanly and make both think the other are evil. As an example, take the pedophilia issue. From a Republican perspective all the immigrants coming in are part of criminal networks murdering and raping children, and the complicit democrats with blood on their hands deflect from it with the Epstein files which the Republican thinks are nothingburgers because Pam Bondi told them so. And now those demonrats are hating the innocent victims by not standing up! From a Democrat's perspective pedophile criminals and networks like 764 don't matter because a friend of a friend told them that Trump, who MSNBC tells them to hate with all their might, was raping kids left and right in the Epstein files. And now those fascists are supporting the pedophiles by standing up! So from both perspectives the other party seems full of pedophiles who should be hanged. See how the narrative's been set up?

Both those perspectives have some truth (Elite class including Trump are all in the Epstein files, criminal networks like 764 run rampant, unrestricted migration is a very bad thing, the economy is shit and continues to steal from the American people, gun control is garbage, the Constitution is good, most cops are good but some are tyrants, etc.) but the problem is those truths are divided across each party like the example above. Each party roughly has half of the truth, and half complete lies (economy is the strongest ever, all immigrants including small children are violent terrorists, inflation is going down, troons are being genocided, TDS is normal, the Minneapolis fraud isn't happening all over the country, Epstein is a democrat created nothingburger, 764 and similar criminality is a nothingburger result of Trump, gun control is required, the Constitution is bad because people I've been told to hate hide behind it, ICE is in our best interest, ACAB, etc.). The reason this is such a problem is because the truths are divided between both parties, you can't recognize all of them at the same time without being considered an outcast and shunned by both parties at best, or called a terrorist/criminal by both at worst.
 
Última edición:
Even when accounting with the high child mortality rate issue, you have to also consider that Medieval living conditions are much worse than living conditions in Rome or Ancient China (on a good day). An average Medieval City is much more overcrowded and unsanitary than a Roman or Chinese one (again, on a good day so no collapsed societies).
Again, this is mostly myth. Mediaeval European society was much cleaner than later 16th or 17th century European society, and at least as clean as Roman society, with public baths in even small villages and soap, which the romans never had. Most people in that era bathed at least weekly. Often multiple times a week. This is well attested.

You seem to be clinging to the myth of the "dark ages" as a great societal collapse caused by christianity, expressed in the infamous chart:

1772027420969.png

Your understanding of history is fundamentally flawed. You can't even get basic details right.
 
Again, this is mostly myth. Mediaeval European society was much cleaner than later 16th or 17th century European society, and at least as clean as Roman society, with public baths in even small villages and soap, which the romans never had. Most people in that era bathed at least weekly. Often multiple times a week. This is well attested.
It depends on if it's the early, high or late Medieval Era as well. I can see that this is the case a century or two prior to the renaissance, but I doubt this is so during the 5 to 10th Centuries where Leprosy, Buboes and Typhoid are just everywhere.

Soap for example is popularized at the 14th Century and public bathhouses only shown up by around the 12th, before then only nobles and knights have bathhouses. Those are high and late-middle age time periods where secularism began to slowly return because of knowledge from the Muslim world, rogue Byzantine-era knowledge stocks, and the increasing amounts of secular clergy amongst the church's ranks. By around the 13th to 15th Century you see lots of stuff that won't even fly during the 8th or 9th (like the Garden of Earthly Delights or the Divine Comedy).
 
Última edición:
Soap for example is popularized at the 14th Century and public bathhouses only shown up by around the 12th, before then only nobles and knights have bathhouses.
Again, you're incorrect. Celtic tribes were using soap at least as early as 100BC (the romans of the day thought it was used as a hair treatment when they first encountered it). Soap was in widespread use throughout Europe by 300 AD, when there was a popular debate about whether gaulish or germanic soap was the superior. Soap making was a guilded industry by the 600s and remained so for centuries. Public baths were found everywhere throughout the entire roman and post-roman era, in any place that had a large enough population to sustain one, which would mean even villages would have at least one public bath. They remained in use throughout the entire mediaeval period and well into the early modern, despite plagues and various nasty diseases (and were in fact the source of a couple of waterborne diseases, like cholera for instance, which thrives in the warm, moist conditions of a bathhouse). The thing that killed off public baths was the price of the wood used to construct them, which rose sharply during the 16th century, leading to a general decline of public baths as they fell into disrepair.
 
New one I'd like to see someone do a deep dive into would be Mossad having a mole inside the White House during the Clinton admin and it was Monica Lewinsky - apparently she's Jewish?
When i was in college for an ethics class we sat down and watched "Monica in Black and White" which was an interview/expose that MTV did in 2002. I didn't know or care much about it when i saw it, but it struck me as very odd. The whole scandal was essentially talked about in pop culture as if monica was just a pawn (rightfully so, really) but then you have this massive over-produced headlining television expose on the most propagandized television network in cable tv's history telling you that she was just a smoll bean that was taken advantage of. Really made me question the whole thing - how much of this was a setup? Like this wasn't just clinton unable to keep his dick in his pants and diddling some intern, this was targetted spy-vs-spy bullshit, wasn't it?


Gulf war syndrome (1989-1991) was caused by the MRNA, or similar experimental vaccine, given to soldiers pre-deployment. It was trialed again in Bosnia in the mid 90s and then again during the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns of the War on Terror, in the form of an Anti-Anthrax vaccine (as retarded as it sounds).

MRNA is the holy grail of medicine, and the first company to crack it will be richer than all humans in history combined.
Anthrax was attractive as a bioweapon because it has a ridiculous survival mechanism so you can be confident that a batch of bacteria you produced 30 years ago would still be infectious. This is also why it's retarded because in hindsight if you abandon a laboratory for 30 years everything is going to be dead inside of it except for the anthrax. During the 60's and 70's both the USSR and US were heavily invested in chemical and biological weapons research, anthrax being one of the biggest targets. If, and this is a big 1980's deflected hypothetical, IF the russians did have a large scale biological weapons program distributed through their territory that they abandoned at some point, then the only real tangible risk that soldiers are going to run into during a large scale ground invasion of the ukranian heartland would be anthrax. And tactical nuclear weapons. They were still fearmongering this shit during the Gulf War, as if Saddam illicitly producing chemical weapons meant he was producing biological weapons.

Of course hindsight is 20/20, nowadays western europe is trying to find any excuse to not invade ukraine, nobody even has tactical nukes anymore, and come to find out the soviets also never abandoned those laboratories they just sold them to chinese private equity firms whose molecular biology research was focused on influenza viruses. The anthrax terrorism scare circa 2002 came from some american scientist with ties to the CIA, and everybody and their dog knows that the government made up a justification to invade iraq.
 
Última edición:
Their priests are not professionals but appointed volunteers. They learn, investigate and improve.
Small piece on the professional Roman priests and their magic practices. My favorite was reading bird innards.


Publius Claudius Pulcher was a Roman consul and admiral during the First Punic War who became infamous for ignoring a bad omen from sacred chickens before the Battle of Drepana in 249 BC. When the priest reported that the birds refused to eat—signaling divine disapproval—he reportedly mocked the ritual, threw the chickens into the sea, and declared, "If they will not eat, let them drink." His defiance led to a devastating naval defeat, with around 93 out of 120 Roman ships lost, and marked him as a cautionary tale of religious hubris.
Encyclopedia Britannica





Michael Grant

Britannica Editors

Feb. 3, 2026 •History

Ask Anything

Precedence among Roman priests belonged to the rex sacrorum (“king of the sacred rites”), who, after the expulsion of the kings, took over the residue of their religious powers and duties that had not been assumed by the Republican officers of state. Nevertheless, the hold exercised by the rex sacrorum and his colleagues was weakened by the Law of the Twelve Tables (c. 451–450 bce), which displayed the secular arm exercising some control over sacral law. As late as c. 275 bce the religious calendar was still dated by the rex sacrorum but by this time he was already fading into the background.



Very early origins can also be attributed to some of the flamines, the priests of certain specific cults, and particularly to the three major flamines of Jupiter, Mars, and Quirinus. Jupiter’s priest, the flamen dialis, was encompassed by an extraordinary series of taboos, some dating to the Bronze Age, which made it difficult to fill the office in historic times.



Except for the rex sacrorum and flamen dialis, whose duties were unusually professional and technical, almost all Roman priesthoods were held by men prominent in public life. The social distinction and political prestige carried by these part-time posts caused them to be keenly fought for.



There were four chief colleges, or boards, of priests: the pontifices, augures, quindecimviri sacris faciundis, and epulones. Originally three, and finally 16 in number, the pontifices (whose name may recall antique tasks and magic rites in connection with bridges) had assumed control of the religious system by the 3rd century bce. The chief priest, the pontifex maximus (the head of the state clergy), was an elected official and not chosen from the existing pontifices. The augures, whose name may have been derived from the practice of magic in fertility rites and perhaps meant “increasers,” had the task of discovering whether or not the gods approved of an action. This they performed mainly by interpreting divine signs in the movements of birds (auspicia). Such divination was elevated, perhaps under Etruscan influence, into an indispensable preliminary to state acts, though the responsibility for the decision rested not with the priests but with the presiding state officials, who were said to “possess the auspices.” In private life too, even as late as Cicero and Horace in the 1st century bce, important courses of action were often preceded by consultation of the heavens. The Etruscan method of divining from the liver and entrails of animals (haruspicina) became popular in the Second Punic War, though its practitioners (who numbered 60 under the empire) never attained an official priesthood.
 
New one I'd like to see someone do a deep dive into would be Mossad having a mole inside the White House during the Clinton admin and it was Monica Lewinsky - apparently she's Jewish?
I mean:
1772037786716.png
Even Wikipedia says it:
Lewinsky was born in San Francisco, California, and grew up in an affluent family in Los Angeles, California. She lived in Brentwood, and later Beverly Hills. Her father is Bernard Lewinsky, an oncologist, who is the son of German Jews who emigrated from Germany in the 1920s, first moving to El Salvador and then finally to the United States when he was 14.
She's had work done. This is how she looks now:
1772037832215.png
 
Soap for example is popularized at the 14th Century and public bathhouses only shown up by around the 12th, before then only nobles and knights have bathhouses
Public bath houses were common throughout Europe through centuries, though the suffered during the plague for obvious reasons.

Medievalists.net


Medieval writers saw bathing as a serious and careful activity. One medical treatise, the Secreta Secretorum, has an entire section on baths. It notes that the spring and winter are good times for bathing, but it should be avoided as much as possible in the summer. It also warns that excessively long baths lead to fatness and feebleness. Meanwhile, Maino De Maineri offers over 57 different ways to take a bath, depending on factors like old age, pregnancy and or just travelling. His rules for bathing run 1500 words long.

Some famous bathing sites had their own rules. In 1336, Pietro de Tussignano formulated twelve rules for those coming to the Italian town at Burmi, which lies near Switzerland, to get the healing effects of its bath. They include that the person should beforehand not have too much sexual intercourse (nor have abstained from it) and that he should also enter the bath with an empty stomach (or at most, just two spoons of raisins with a little wine). You could only pour the water over your head if you were clean-shaven, otherwise your hairs might impede the effects of the water. The person should take the baths for fifteen days, spending up to an hour a day getting washed, but if all goes well, the bather will benefit for over six months with improved health.


For most people, having a private bath was not an option – it was simply too costly and too time-consuming to have their own baths. That does not mean they went without bathing, for public baths were very common throughout Europe. By the thirteenth century one could find over 32 bathhouses in Paris; Alexander Neckham, who lived in that city a century earlier, says that he would be awakened in the mornings by people crying in the streets that “the baths are too hot!”

In Southwark, the town on the opposite side of the Thames River from London, a person could choose from 18 hot baths. Even smaller towns would have bathhouses, often connected with the local bakery – the baths could make use of the heat coming from their ovens to help heat their water.
Medieval-public-bath.jpg
 
New one I'd like to see someone do a deep dive into would be Mossad having a mole inside the White House during the Clinton admin and it was Monica Lewinsky - apparently she's Jewish?
Lewinsky was a mossad plant and the fat bitch was her handler. Why else would they keep a cum covered dress unless it was for blackmail?

History is exactly like life today and also completely different. The main thing is that they had less time saving shortcuts due to less technology. So they worked less professionally but worked more at home doing basic necessities. You can't work 80 hours a week doing labor and then do another 60 at home to stay alive, so everyone was less profitable. This compounds with less technology meaning less labor multiplying equipment means that every extra person born means an extra person worth of resource needed. They had 10 kids because they needed 5 to live to adulthood.
But for all seriousness, there is no way people are fed and paid more than an average American (especially paid) in the Medieval Era. Obviously things improve slightly during the High Medieval Era (and even poor peasants can afford pork after the black death because most of the meddlesome clergy and nobles die off) but this is decidedly not the case in the Early Middle Ages
They weren't, they had more free time to hunt or grow a family plot of land but they also had to cut and salvage firewood every day. You would be expected to work on community projects as a form of tax in addition to paying either money or goods. So you'd have to maintain roads and wells and bridges as well as help your neighbor.
One thing that people fail to remember (or that isn't taught in history for whatever reason) is that the Mass Extermination, or Holocaust, or Final Solution or whatever you want to call it wasn't just jews as the victims.
One thing people fail to remember is the entire holocaust was made up in the 60s and 70s. The only people killed were those caused by the war.
It was Jews, half-jews, gypsies, Christians, homosexuals, retards, cripples, and anyone who was deemed "Non-Aryan."
They made that up because no one was sympathetic to the jews.
Hitler used the Jews to rile up the masses, but it was all about creating a Master Race. It wasn't just the Jews that it was perpetrated against.
Hitler's axis powers were more multicultural and multinational than the allies. Jesse Owens said Hitler treated him better than FDR. Again all of this was made up to legitimize the holocaust narrative and make siding with the communists more palatable.
They recently corrected the gypsy death toll down by something like 80%.
They'll make up any number that sounds reasonable except zero for some reason
 
That's also probably why she's still alive. If it was a normal intern, Hilary would have had her suicided a long time ago.
I remember reading an article connecting all the dots 20+ years ago. She was completely unqualified for the position compared to everyone else and was specifically selected for the job due to her being Bill's type. The whole thing was based on stopping his Healthcare bill because of all the political favors he used up and gave only to completely blow his presidency by having it fail, which made him a pawn to Isreal at that point.


Also: people have always bathed in the sense they used wash basins and rags to give themselves whore baths. They reserved going to actual bath houses for special occasions. Think about it logically: no one was carrying 50 gallons of water to fill a tub with any consistency. In overpopulated cities you couldn't use the rivers or anywhere else since they were basically open sewers.

Its all just retarded academics not understanding anything about the world talking out of their ass about ideas that are stillborn.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo