Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema Null
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio

Move to Lolcow Subforum?


  • Total de votantes
    42
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I step out for two hours and the Wizardchan thread takes off.

Not bad.

First off, welcome @Wiz . A bit let down that things seemed to have already teetered off into the land of IQ claims, intelligence dick measuring contests, blind insults, ect. ect.
That shit ain't fun to read in a thread. If people want that, they can pick from our vast collection of individual Loveshy poster threads.
This goes for Kiwi's behavior too. If you really want to talk about @Wiz himself, this isn't the place. Stop calling him autismal in one sentence posts.
Trimming out any further derailment starting here.

So let's not turn this wonderful thread into one about YOU @Wiz , and steer things back to your original prompt. I'd be happy to answer anything you'd like about Wizardchan or hear your thoughts on the current conspiracy theories going around.
 
... Not only is Labelle's sense of fashion for Sandrat terrible, but her lighting is too.

I'll say.

I think I finally get it: Sandrat's legally blind! It explains why he can't fucking dress himself in anyway whatsoever!

The sad part is that IMHO, Stephie dresses better than him. And by that I mean he looks less ugly in a dress.
 
Hey! Good to see more wizards come to this place. It always brings a smile to my face. Though it tends to leave really quickly once I start to read what they write here.
Hello.
Curious, isn't it, how quite some users of /cow/ (of which I am a user) and Kiwifarms are wizards?

"Since you seem reasonable and interested in conversation: may I ask you what made you turn into one? Just curious."
I won't go into too much detail.

Basically, from a young age, I started noticing that humans (and women in particular, but men are not much better) are petty wastes of biomass (I'm not much better, but at least I realise) and that I should not waste my time on them, as nothing good could come out of it. If you're interested in hearing additional details, I'll supply.


Glaive:
"First off, welcome @Wiz"
Thank you.

"A bit let down that things seemed to have already teetered off into the land of IQ claims, intelligence dick measuring contests, blind insults, ect. ect."
Yes, I wish things could have stayed a little more civil -- but for some reason, the users of this forum feel the need to be rude, even after having been polite all the time.

"So let's not turn this wonderful thread into one about YOU @Wiz , and steer things back to your original prompt."
Agreed. I've been replyting to posts continuously for about an hour and a half now and I'm getting tired. Out of courtesy, I replied to all the posts that have to do with me [until this point, I guess].

"I'd be happy to answer anything you'd like about Wizardchan"
I'm not expecting a honest answer, but what happened to Anachronos?

"on the current conspiracy theories going around."
The Jews are behind it, duh.
 
I'm not expecting a honest answer, but what happened to Anachronos?

Someone had a pretty spot on theory from your thread. He's not dead obviously, and I've seen him pop up on some IRC channels. Although he's entirely dissociated himself with former aliases and even material published under those names. Like he bawwwleted the /g/ tech wiki he made a while back. He might have thrown me under the bus, but he had little to no actual interest in Wizardchan itself. So it's not shocking whatsoever for him to wipe himself clean of the whole persona.

"So let's not turn this wonderful thread into one about YOU @Wiz , and steer things back to your original prompt."
Agreed. I've been replyting to posts continuously for about an hour and a half now and I'm getting tired. Out of courtesy, I replied to all the posts that have to do with me [until this point, I guess].

If people are still interested in talking to you, they will likely start an individual thread for ya. In which case anything goes and you'll be able to debate IQ or whatever you and the Kiwis want.

Also, if you want to quote individual lines, you can do so by highlighting that actual text, and his "Quote me now". Quite useful.
 
Someone had a pretty spot on theory from your thread. He's not dead obviously, and I've seen him pop up on some IRC channels. Although he's entirely dissociated himself with former aliases and even material published under those names. Like he bawwwleted the /g/ tech wiki he made a while back. He might have thrown me under the bus, but he had little to no actual interest in Wizardchan itself. So it's not shocking whatsoever for him to wipe himself clean of the whole persona.



If people are still interested in talking to you, they will likely start an individual thread for ya. In which case anything goes and you'll be able to debate IQ or whatever you and the Kiwis want.

Also, if you want to quote individual lines, you can do so by highlighting that actual text, and his "Quote me now". Quite useful.
Do you know who the admin of wizchan.org is?

After the demise of the original site it was posted both on the refugee 8chan boards and on wizchan that there was an interest in you coming back somehow. That obviously didn't pan out because the community was very against the idea, but did the owner of wizchan contact you during that time?
 
Of course you're not. You're not stupid, your intellect is slightly above average and you know full well, that that post isn't (completely) serious. Yet, you chose to post it here, for two reasons:
I). In order to revive this thread.
II). More importantly, in order to receive "Internet points".
So, to defeat this, you began bumping the thread and engaging people on a point-by-point basis. It's not like this was a spur of a moment mistake; you listened to an 8 minute audio captcha just for the privilege to be here. There was plenty of time to realize that this was a completely counter-productive course of action. I guess you need an IQ of 154 to be that smart, huh?
 
Do you know who the admin of wizchan.org is?

After the demise of the original site it was posted both on the refugee 8chan boards and on wizchan that there was an interest in you coming back somehow. That obviously didn't pan out because the community was very against the idea, but did the owner of wizchan contact you during that time?

I'm pretty sure I know who is at the very least paying the server fees. Structurally I couldn't tell you the exact layout of responsibilities there. It's purposely obscured along with the anachronos approach of little to no community interaction. Which has it's perks. But expect the narrative of the site to constantly become more and more /meta/ centered because of it.

Also, someone ended up creating a thread about our new user @Wiz
Please direct any and all questions/comments about him personally there: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/wiz-the-wizard-lolcow.12914/
 
Ask a child if they want something to eat, 99% chance they'll say yes. Turns out it's brocoli. Child changes their mind.
This situation can be applied to the problem here.
Child wants sex? Child doesn't know what that is, but say yes anyway. In the middle of it, child changes their mind.
See where I'm going with this?
Plus, assuming his story is true and his victim wasn't very phased by sexual activity, that probably means she had already been molested by another adult who told her "this is okay, this is normal, everyone does this we just don't talk about it".
So he took advantage of a nine-year-old who had already been sexually violated, but instead of feeling like an absolute fucking monster about it, he uses it to say "well she was eager! we were boyfriend and girlfriend!" and it's completely vile.

I believe he said that girls are sexually mature at seven, actually. I wish I could find the post where he talks about how little girls and boys should be able to have sex while they're still under ten.
Fuck, I know what post you're talking about. Should be on one of his receipt blogs. I was just hoping my brain was remembering it wrong and that it was a slightly higher number. Pretend I gave your post a "horrifying" rating.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo