- Registrado
- 26 de Sep, 2015
Posts are replied to accordingly.You're kinda beating a dead horse at this point.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Posts are replied to accordingly.You're kinda beating a dead horse at this point.
"waste"
How can you "waste" a life, as long as one is enjoying what he is doing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EudaimoniaIf that's what one enjoys doing, what is wrong with that?
I asked you for your scientific papers and you haven't given any.*humors you with my "science"*
Wikipedia is not a "scientific" paper, for it's based on a collection of (scientific) papers and (mostly) other sources.
As long as you enjoy doing what you do, then there's nothing wrong with doing what you do.This is the essence of wizardry embodied in six words
Although they don't exist we would like to see what you think "confirms" thisDo you want to see the scientific papers that confirm this?
Huh?I asked you for your scientific papers and you haven't given any.
Why?Although they don't exist we would like to see what you think "confirms" this
I didn't mean that literally... it's an expression. It meant to present your "evidence" so I can laugh at it.Huh?
I'm pretty sure you asked me to:
"humor me[you] with your[my] 'science'"?
that's what I did.
Can you prove it?If you realized how pathetic you are then you would be in utter horror
Sounds like an excuse used by somebody who doesn't have any actualy supporting evidenceWhy?
You're just going to spout out memes instead of engaging in serious discussion.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11262708Wikipedia is not a "scientific" paper, for it's based on a collection of (scientific) papers and (mostly) other sources.
... Not only is Labelle's sense of fashion for Sandrat terrible, but her lighting is too.
I think I finally get it: Sandrat's legally blind! It explains why he can't fucking dress himself in anyway whatsoever!
Hello.Hey! Good to see more wizards come to this place. It always brings a smile to my face. Though it tends to leave really quickly once I start to read what they write here.
I'm not expecting a honest answer, but what happened to Anachronos?
"So let's not turn this wonderful thread into one about YOU @Wiz , and steer things back to your original prompt."
Agreed. I've been replyting to posts continuously for about an hour and a half now and I'm getting tired. Out of courtesy, I replied to all the posts that have to do with me [until this point, I guess].
Do you know who the admin of wizchan.org is?Someone had a pretty spot on theory from your thread. He's not dead obviously, and I've seen him pop up on some IRC channels. Although he's entirely dissociated himself with former aliases and even material published under those names. Like he bawwwleted the /g/ tech wiki he made a while back. He might have thrown me under the bus, but he had little to no actual interest in Wizardchan itself. So it's not shocking whatsoever for him to wipe himself clean of the whole persona.
If people are still interested in talking to you, they will likely start an individual thread for ya. In which case anything goes and you'll be able to debate IQ or whatever you and the Kiwis want.
Also, if you want to quote individual lines, you can do so by highlighting that actual text, and his "Quote me now". Quite useful.
So, to defeat this, you began bumping the thread and engaging people on a point-by-point basis. It's not like this was a spur of a moment mistake; you listened to an 8 minute audio captcha just for the privilege to be here. There was plenty of time to realize that this was a completely counter-productive course of action. I guess you need an IQ of 154 to be that smart, huh?Of course you're not. You're not stupid, your intellect is slightly above average and you know full well, that that post isn't (completely) serious. Yet, you chose to post it here, for two reasons:
I). In order to revive this thread.
II). More importantly, in order to receive "Internet points".
Precisely.engaging people on a point-by-point basis
Define productive.a completely counter-productive course of action.
Do you know who the admin of wizchan.org is?
After the demise of the original site it was posted both on the refugee 8chan boards and on wizchan that there was an interest in you coming back somehow. That obviously didn't pan out because the community was very against the idea, but did the owner of wizchan contact you during that time?
Plus, assuming his story is true and his victim wasn't very phased by sexual activity, that probably means she had already been molested by another adult who told her "this is okay, this is normal, everyone does this we just don't talk about it".Ask a child if they want something to eat, 99% chance they'll say yes. Turns out it's brocoli. Child changes their mind.
This situation can be applied to the problem here.
Child wants sex? Child doesn't know what that is, but say yes anyway. In the middle of it, child changes their mind.
See where I'm going with this?
Fuck, I know what post you're talking about. Should be on one of his receipt blogs. I was just hoping my brain was remembering it wrong and that it was a slightly higher number. Pretend I gave your post a "horrifying" rating.I believe he said that girls are sexually mature at seven, actually. I wish I could find the post where he talks about how little girls and boys should be able to have sex while they're still under ten.