Science Trial Looking To Bring Clinically Dead ‘Back To Life’ - ??????????


It is sometimes frightening how well classic fiction predicts the future. For instance, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury described earbuds well before they were ever developed. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is another terrifying example. In the book, Dr. Frankenstein experimented with resuscitation using dead tissue reanimation, a treatment that was experimented with by real scientists in the 1800s. Recently, researchers are once again looking for ways to reverse death, and they may have found the solution.

A New Trial May Bring the Dead Back to Life: The ReAnima Project​

For this study, the researchers will use stem cells as a “reset button” for the body to erase cell damage and stimulate tissue regeneration. According to those involved, the research may lead to “complex tissue and organ regeneration, disease reversion, and even biological age reversal.

The trial will be run by Indian specialist Dr. Himanshi Bansal and biotech companies called Revita Life Sciences [1] and Bioquark Inc. [2]

Twenty patients are the subjects of this study. They are all braindead, which is considered clinical death, and are only kept alive through life support. The test will involve injecting brain stem cells and peptides into their brains bi-weekly over six weeks and a series of other treatments including lasers and nerve stimulation techniques, which have brought patients out of comas in the past.

The researchers believe the stem cells will follow a similar process salamander cells use to regrow limbs, that is, differentiating into functional brain cells.

The patients will be monitored for several months through brain imaging equipment for signs of regeneration, especially in the upper spinal cord where the brain stem controls breathing and the heartbeat. [3]

“This represents the first trial of its kind and another step towards the eventual reversal of death in our lifetime,” said Dr. Ira Pastor, the CEO of Bioquark. “To undertake such a complex initiative, we are combining biologic regenerative medicine tools with other existing medical devices typically used for stimulation of the central nervous system in patients with other severe disorders of consciousness.
“We hope to see results within the first two to three months.”
The initial stage is called ‘First in Human Neuro-Regeneration & Neuro-Reanimation,’ and will take place at the Anupam Hospital in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand India.

Since this first stage has small and non-random sample size, it’s more a of a proof-of-concept than a conclusive study.

Dr. Bansal claimed to have some previous success with two patients in the Gulf and Europe.

They are still in a minimal conscious state but who knows that they may come out and have reasonable conscious useful human life.
Dr. Pastor added, “It is a long-term vision of ours that a full recovery in such patients is a possibility, although that is not the focus of this first study – but it is a bridge to that eventuality.” [4]
The trial was estimated to begin in July 2019 and end in July 2021.

What is Considered “Braindead”?​

The diagnosis of “braindead” comes when a person loses all brain stem function, including breathing, and the potential for consciousness. However, braindead patients may still have other perfectly functional systems. For example, their bodies can still digest food, excrete waste, circulate blood, balance hormones, age, sexually mature, spike a fever, heal wounds, and deliver a baby.

Some studies show that some electrical activity and blood flow continue in the brain after becoming braindead, but not enough to allow the entire body to function. [5]

Opposition to the Trial​

Some scientists are doubtful this trial would lead to any sort of recovery for braindead patients. Previous studies have found that people’s capabilities for regeneration is rather limited.

Dr. Dean Burnett, a neuroscientist at the Cardiff University’s Centre for Medical Education said, “While there have been numerous demonstrations in recent years that the human brain and nervous system may not be as fixed and irreparable as is typically assumed, the idea that brain death could be easily reversed seems very far-fetched, given our current abilities and understanding of neuroscience.”
Saving individual parts might be helpful but it’s a long way from resurrecting a whole working brain, in a functional, undamaged state.
A letter published in the journal Critical Care summarized these thoughts: “the trial borders on quackery.
Dead means dead.” [6]

How Bringing The Dead Back To Life Can Affect Other Diseases​

Even if this project doesn’t successfully ‘bring back the dead,’ it may be useful to further understanding of the braindead state and possibly innovate the treatment for neurological diseases.

Through our study, we will gain unique insights into the state of human brain death, which will have important connections to future therapeutic development for other severe disorders of consciousness, such as coma, and the vegetative and minimally conscious states, as well as a range of degenerative CNS conditions, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease,” said Dr. Sergei Paylian, Founder, President, and Chief Science Officer of Bioquark. [7]
According to Dr. Bansal: “This will open the door for future research and especially for people who lose their dear ones suddenly.”
 
What's that!? Time to cleanse the land of foul necromancy with blade and holy fire? Don't mind if do.

1627095146421.png
 
Medically speaking, clinical death is actually something of a grey area. It was once the case that once you went into cardiac arrest, you were pronounced dead, whereas nowadays it is possible to be revived following cardiac arrest, and in recent years, innovative techniques like therapeutic hypothermia (also known as targeted temperature management) have pushed the boundaries of how long after cardiac arrest someone can be brought back.

Theoretically, if the cells can be repaired or preserved, it may be possible to revive someone days or even weeks after they have been pronounced clinically dead by current standards. The real philosophical question this raises is: were they ever really dead, or do we simply not yet have the technology to allow them to recover? This question definitely has a lot of implications for future medical ethics.
 
Medically speaking, clinical death is actually something of a grey area. It was once the case that once you went into cardiac arrest, you were pronounced dead, whereas nowadays it is possible to be revived following cardiac arrest, and in recent years, innovative techniques like therapeutic hypothermia (also known as targeted temperature management) have pushed the boundaries of how long after cardiac arrest someone can be brought back.

Theoretically, if the cells can be repaired or preserved, it may be possible to revive someone days or even weeks after they have been pronounced clinically dead by current standards. The real philosophical question this raises is: were they ever really dead, or do we simply not yet have the technology to allow them to recover? This question definitely has a lot of implications for future medical ethics.
I can't wait until we see "mostly dead" used as an official medical and legal statement when it comes to bringing someone who wasn't-quite-completely-degenerated back.
 
I can't wait until we see "mostly dead" used as an official medical and legal statement when it comes to bringing someone who wasn't-quite-completely-degenerated back.
I'm not really sure how the law will draw the line in the future, but it's pretty clear that there is already a disconnect between the the way that the law understands death and the way that medical science understands it. As far as the law is concerned, death is treated as a definitive event, while the science is increasingly showing us that it is a gradual process.

The difficulty is knowing how much of the original person might remain following revival. If there is a lot of cellular damage in the brain, for instance, and future stem cell innovations allow us to replace the damaged cells before bringing the person back to life, would they still be the same person if they no longer retained most of their past memories? Another issue we're faced with is whether or not this question also applies to present sufferers of retrograde amnesia.
 
Ah yes, and once the trials are a success they can work on the next project...

Regeneration of their credulity.

But in all seriousness the study is a good one and while it is misleading to call bringing people income "back from the dead" the idea of having any success in regeneration of brain or spinal cord material would be a monumental leap forward and welcomed.

There is hope for PennisDragger.
 
Why risk the recently dead voting the wrong way?
More legitimacy -- if some undead mofos vote because of medical technology, it will throw normies off the scent for larger scale voter fraud (of all kinds btw). It's a calculated risk for these types.
 
Even if they brought back, repeatly, the sainted George Floyd for a thousand years he wouldn't manage to accomplish anything. We need to make sure things like this are only used for people who will continue to contribute great things.

OTOH, this takes away the only decent argument against the death penalty, so we should start culling criminals now in case this leads to more discoveries in the future. If (when) it doesn't, oh well.
 
Yesterday I watched a tv show about cryogenic preservation with liquid nitrogen. It showed an institute where people pay to be preserved in big tanks of nitrogen. According to those people, the freshly dead corpses may possibly be resurrected in the future, that's why they were frozen like popcicles. The scientist being interviewed said they even had pets and human heads.
I found all that freaky as fuck.
 
Yesterday I watched a tv show about cryogenic preservation with liquid nitrogen. It showed an institute where people pay to be preserved in big tanks of nitrogen. According to those people, the freshly dead corpses may possibly be resurrected in the future, that's why they were frozen like popcicles. The scientist being interviewed said they even had pets and human heads.
I found all that freaky as fuck.
Yeah, they're full of shit.

The cryo process is destructive to the extreme, all their cells are basically gone as far as function is concerned. What they have done is preserved a still image of the body as it was when they froze it. If they ever manage to 'ressurect' those people, then it won't be them. It'll be a reconstruction that thinks it's them. Literally no different to the idea of mind 'uploading', nothing is being moved, you're being copied and then the copy is going to walk away from your corpse and go about its merry day.

The only way to achieve 'immortality' is through life extension; once you're dead, you're dead.
 
Not pretending I'm smart or know anything about this shit, but if they're trying to regenerate brain tissue, doesn't that imply that whatever necromantic hell-beast returns would be a different person?
If I had to guess, regenerating new brain tissue would basically create a drooling mental retard that would need to be taught everything all over again, if you even could teach it anything.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo