Science Masculinity: Men like meat because it makes them feel more MANLY, study claims

Link (Archive)

Masculinity: Men like meat because it makes them feel more MANLY, study claims​

deepdesrochers
13 hours ago
16AE9609-2A95-4FA4-8700-6684F063A784.jpeg

Men like meat because it feels masculine: men consume more beef and chicken than women and establish and confirm a masculine identity, “the study claims.​

  • UCLA experts surveyed approximately 1,700 US adults about their diet and gender sensations.
  • The more men follow traditional gender roles, the more beef / chicken they eat
  • According to researchers, the same tendency is not seen among women
  • Findings may help encourage men to switch to a sustainable meat-free diet

Men like to eat more meat than women. Because I find it useful to “establish and confirm a masculine identity.”

University researchers California, Los Angeles We surveyed more than 1,700 US adults to see if the stereotype that “real men eat meat” really works.

They found that, unlike women, more men feel they have to obey. Traditional concept of masculinity, The more beef and chicken they tended to eat.

According to the team, the findings could help inform future efforts to encourage consumers to switch to something more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Meat-free meal..

Men like to eat more meat than women. Because I feel it helps to “establish and confirm a masculine identity.” The study concludes
B805FA6C-99C3-44AC-87E1-825C0EB27D00.jpeg
Researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles surveyed more than 1,700 US adults to see if the stereotype that “real men eat meat” really works. They found that, unlike women, men tended to eat beef (left) and chicken (right) so much that they felt they had to follow the traditional notion of masculinity.

The study was conducted by psychologists Daniel Rosenfeld and Janet Tomiyama at the University of California, Los Angeles.

“Our findings suggest that shifting men’s perception of the ideal gender role from traditional masculine can reduce beef and chicken consumption,” Rosenfeld said. Mr. says.

“This is especially promising for beef, given that beef production poses a much greater environmental threat than other forms of meat production.”

In their study, the duo targeted 1,706 US adults aged 18-88 years, both in terms of meat consumption and openness to becoming vegan or vegetarian, as well as gender sensations and traditional gender roles. We investigated the suitability for.

“First, men reported eating all kinds of meat more often, including beef, pork, fish and chicken, compared to women. The effect size of these differences diminishes in this order.” The researcher explained.

The answer is also that among men, a greater fit to traditional gender stereotypes, both more frequent consumption of the two types of meat (beef and chicken) and a lower level of openness to vegetarianism. Showed to be related to.

No similar effect was observed on meat consumption for fish or pork.

However, the same tendency was not seen among women. This suggests that men may eat more meat to test and carry out their sense of traditional masculine identity.
B1B59ECE-E315-4859-A4C1-598ABD1F8436.jpeg
According to the answers, among men, the more compatible with traditional gender stereotypes, the more frequently they consume two types of meat, beef (pictured) and chicken, and their openness to vegetarianism. Was shown to be associated with both low.
7D5704A0-F45F-43C5-B889-B3C06ADFC9E4.jpeg

“A deeper understanding of the role of gender may help reduce public meat consumption to improve human health and environmental sustainability,” the researchers concluded.
“Self-attributable masculine / feminine gender differences between men provide insight into these phenomena,” the researchers wrote in their paper.

“A deeper understanding of the role of gender may help reduce public meat consumption in order to improve human health and environmental sustainability.”

The full findings of the study were published in the journal appetite..

Eating meat and dairy products is harmful to the environment​

Eating meat, eggs and dairy products can have a negative impact on the environment in many ways.

Cows, pigs and other livestock release large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Methane in the atmosphere is less than other greenhouse gases, but about 25 times more effective than carbon dioxide in trapping heat.

Raising livestock also means turning forests into agricultural land. This means that trees that absorb CO2 will be logged, further increasing climate change. Approximately one-third of the world’s grain is used to feed animals raised for human consumption, so more trees are needed to convert land to crop cultivation. It has been cut down.

Factory farms and crop cultivation also require large amounts of water, and 542 liters of water are used to produce only one chicken breast.
In addition to this, the nitrogen-based fertilizers used in crops increase nitrous oxide emissions. Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere. These fertilizers can also flow into rivers, further contributing to pollution.

Overall, research shows that becoming a
vegetarian can cut carbon emissions from food in half.You can reduce this even more by becoming vegan.
 
Since the past year or so, they've really really REALLY been pulling out all the stops with the anti-meat rhetoric. If you look at all of the "eat da bugs" articles in recent months and compare them with the retarded anti-grilling, anti-4th of July, and general anti-meat preaching as of lately, the writing's on the wall.
Well fuck, man, let's just go balls deep into this shit:

20210708_011601.jpg
 
And it makes my wife feel feminine to prepare me the food I require to bust my ass for our family so I guess everyone's happy, right?

Well, at least I'm happy, I guess.
 
Do you guys remember when the Green New Deal first came out and everyone backed off the FAQ saying they never really said that you couldn't get rid of farting cows and they were really embarrassed?

And then a couple of years later they're all openly saying that farting cows are the reason we have to shut down the entire meat industry?

What the fuck is happening?
The left is overreaching as always. Trying to push for vegetarianism isn't new though, they've been doing it for decades, and I for one will never stop eating tasty steaks.
 
Since the past year or so, they've really really REALLY been pulling out all the stops with the anti-meat rhetoric. If you look at all of the "eat da bugs" articles in recent months and compare them with the retarded anti-grilling, anti-4th of July, and general anti-meat preaching as of lately, the writing's on the wall.
Writing's on the wall for what exactly? An ever increasing flood of these stupid articles about how we're all horrible monsters for eating beef and chicken? Who gives a shit?
 
Do you guys remember when the Green New Deal first came out and everyone backed off the FAQ saying they never really said that you couldn't get rid of farting cows and they were really embarrassed?

And then a couple of years later they're all openly saying that farting cows are the reason we have to shut down the entire meat industry?

What the fuck is happening?
We live in an MMORPG written by giggling 12 year olds.

Plenty of women love meat. Guess they are men in disguise. Does this prove the MMORPG theory? Maybe.
 
Última edición:
"Stupid awful toxic men dont want to eat the smeat and troon out because they are poopyheads." -some soy soaked scientist who'se last name no doubt ends in -berg.
 
I dunno, I guess people eat meat because it tastes good and is a good source of essential amino acids? Could've fooled me.

Those filthy cavemen ancestors of mine, how dare they not drink soy like the enlightened saint that the author most certainly is.
 
According to the team, the findings could help inform future efforts to encourage consumers to switch to something more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Meat-free meal..
No, it is that men are less likely to buy the horseshit propaganda because it was not catered to them. The enviro-retardedness had always had a maternal bent. The "we must save Gaia for our children" line. Not to mention that waaaaay more men than women work in industries directly related to agriculture and food processing and are more likely to spot the bullshit for what it is.
Eating meat, eggs and dairy products can have a negative impact on the environment in many ways.

Cows, pigs and other livestock release large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Methane in the atmosphere is less than other greenhouse gases, but about 25 times more effective than carbon dioxide in trapping heat.

Raising livestock also means turning forests into agricultural land. This means that trees that absorb CO2 will be logged, further increasing climate change. Approximately one-third of the world’s grain is used to feed animals raised for human consumption, so more trees are needed to convert land to crop cultivation. It has been cut down.

Factory farms and crop cultivation also require large amounts of water, and 542 liters of water are used to produce only one chicken breast.
In addition to this, the nitrogen-based fertilizers used in crops increase nitrous oxide emissions. Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere. These fertilizers can also flow into rivers, further contributing to pollution.

Overall, research shows that becoming a
vegetarian can cut carbon emissions from food in half.You can reduce this even more by becoming vegan.
I rest my case. It's all just some bullshit peddled by some noodle-armed effeminate douchebag from the city. For the rest of us, a couple minutes of looking into what the best practices are dispels pretty much all of it.

I just wish the industry groups played hardball a bit more. Everything is put into such mild tones. I know they are trying to win over those on the fence with their pansy shit but arming the carnivores with some hard facts so that they can browbeat the soy-fuelled pod-dwellers would go a long way. It really isn't done. Most of what is directly called out is by hicks like me who grew up with ag stuff and loathed the enviro-dickbags making us out to be mindless tools of some greedy corporate earth-killing menace. But we are too few on the ground. The urbanites who regurgitate this no-truth-to-it-whatsoever absolute garbage propaganda drown us out.
 
Última edición:
'Words words words soy soy soy beta beta words words'

That's a lot of paragraphs to basically say 'Eat the soy/bugs men because meat is toxic masculinity and masculinity frightens me cuz I'm a little bitch boy'.

This shit is so transparent once you see it. I'm unsure why this is such a prevalent push against men and 'masculinity' (and decreeing anything remotely masculine as 'toxic') but it's a giant red flag.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo