Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
📚 MegathreadTranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
Idk much about German politics but apparently caring about class issues is very problematic? Wealth inequality impacts more people than retarded social issues.
In the end, even Germany can’t escape western identity politics ):
Idk much about German politics but apparently caring about class issues is very problematic? Wealth inequality impacts more people than retarded social issues.
Because the game has a character creator and you can spend many hours playing the game as the character you create. It’s in the same vein as MMOs like FFXIV as favorites among troons.
Ver archivo adjunto 2242393
Idk much about German politics but apparently caring about class issues is very problematic? Wealth inequality impacts more people than retarded social issues.
In the end, even Germany can’t escape western identity politics ):
God, sometimes - in between bouts of being repulsed by their narcissistic degeneracy - I love how utterly oblivious trannies are to the fact that they're the best thing that's happened to the far right in decades.
As long as girldicks, gormless handmaidens, and fetishistic camouflage for obvious wannabe date rapists are what the left has to offer... we're gonna be seeing a lot more of this, and not just in Germany.
Ver archivo adjunto 2242393
Idk much about German politics but apparently caring about class issues is very problematic? Wealth inequality impacts more people than retarded social issues.
In the end, even Germany can’t escape western identity politics ):
For better or worse, income class is the skeleton key that truly undermines and undoes the comforts of the ruling order (in the scenario that the masses were to become focused on leveling class disparities). The reason why race trumps everything in identity politics is that identity politics is just one (among many) tools/shields that are used by the ruling class against the upheaval of the existing order. People could spend the next 100 years squabbling about racial politics and life will carry on as normal. The minute people of all races start to identify primarily with their class cohorts and unite based along class lines, start a timer, because time is ticking on society as we know it. A black millionaire has more in common with a white millionaire in basically every metric for health and quality of life than a white millionaire/white Appalachian or a black millionaire/black hoodrat. Meanwhile, when race is at stake, someone like Kamala Harris who is within the top five most powerful people on the planet can grandstand all day about her plight as a downtrodden ~~*~*woman of color*~*~~ (LOL)
A united lower class is the stuff of nightmares for the ruling class. So it's convenient for the media and the ruling class to hyperfocus on race.
IMO, the existing order is terrible in many ways (eg public school Teachers teaching 2nd graders about troons and anal sex) but I would imagine living through a major uprising or revolution is orders of magnitude worse so I basically I see agitating for "dismantling the system" (as batshit leftists love to speak of) as insane. I'd rather keep the system if it means the grocery stores have food on the shelves and the lights, heat, and power come on when I flip the switch. Also, exactly NONE of the people I've seen (Antifa losers or Extremists on the right) advocating total upheaval seem like the type of people any of us can trust to be turning the knobs on the human civilization control panel.
What kind of idiocy is that? The left is super pozzed and guzzling the gender kool aid. They are destroying the language more and more just to appease gender specials and if you don't agree, you're automatically "right wing". You are also not allowed to say anything bad about minorities or refugees.
I have poweleveled on here about the troon I work with. I have receipts now. Hidden under waves of spoiler to avoid doxing myself.
1. Literally has anime on the cover slide of his powerpoint. Didn't go unstated, apparently this is a "meaningful" anime in the "transgender community".
3. Next on the agenda... RULES! You must use the CORRECT language. Note, very little in the agenda about any scientific evidence with regards to the treatment of transgender (child) patients. Only about what THEY want for treatment. Ver archivo adjunto 2239701
4. Rules! Ye must follow!!
5. More rules! This slide took up a good 20 minutes - all about what makes them comfortable, do not challenge them, do not question them, do not say anything that can even be slightly misconstrued. Again, we are working with (mostly autistic) children and teenagers. The coworker explicitly says "do NOT tell their parents if the parents don't know". That immediately goes against many ethics guidelines we have with working with children ... what if these children are absconding and meeting with strangers from the internet? What if they are seeking drugs off the internet? NOPE cannot tell their parents for fear of outing them! Ver archivo adjunto 2239708
Finally. My coworker himself. Says he is 181cm - seems taller. Skeletal thinness, eating disordered. A LOT of plastic surgery going on. This is already post SRS, FFS, braces and lazer hair removal.
I'm not even sure if your friend passes as a troon in that picture, or maybe my brain is just being scrambled by the electrolysis rash. I feel the hair, especially at the top just looks male, looks like what you'd expect on a guy that grew his hair out. The nose is very interesting as well -- uniquely shaped nostrils.
The actual presentation just seems like it's directly cribbed from some gender affirmative care handbook (or some reddit resource), and then made less grammatical. Did he have a bibliography?
If I had to guess, it's probably all from one source, but then combined with his own personal knowledge & experiences. I personally suspect that that the "don't ask transwomen to do their male voice" dot point was a conscious addition based on past experience. The surgery point may belong in the same category, but that's more generic. Neither of them are really relevant to pediatric care.
The lack of a theoretical basis is also standard in all gender affirming care narratives, at best you'll get some oblique reference to gender identity being "established" at 18 months or maybe to some Olson-Kennedy study about how gender non-conforming children are - get this - gender non-conforming with respect to their sex (this is peer-reviewed Science, you see). It's worth noting that the sense in which they mean "established" is hard to establish though. In fact, often they seem to stake out a position wherein gender is some sui generis form of identification that follows some predetermined (but unknowable) path. This is the ad hoc defense offered against the obvious fact that their patients' 'gender identities' do in fact commonly change.
In order to then justify the medical interventions they then just assert that non-affirmed patients are a high suicide risk. The evidence for this is literally internet surveys with poor data validation conducted by partisan organizations & individuals. This is also where the 41% statistic comes from. Many of the clinicians are quite conscious of the absurdity of their position, and I think that's what drives the impetus to trivialize the medical interventions they push. Hence, Olson-Kennedy's "if they want their breasts back later then they can just go get 'em re-attached" quip or the constant insistence on the benignity of puberty blockers.
There's a nice section in Shrier's book that captures the essence of the position:
TiFs have this too, where they believe that if they do this it'll solve their mental illness/make them comfortable in their own skin/etc. Trans culture makes people believe that there's an easy answer to their dysfunction, when the truth is usually far more complex and hard to solve, and not in a way that's as simple and easy to understand as trooning out.
I actually think this is even worse in girls. I think males tend to be far less dependent on the belief in being literally ontologically and biologically the opposite-sex 'gender'.
Males seem to be far more interested in things like having female secondary sex characteristics, LARPing as a woman or getting access to female spaces. The actual justification often seems a little secondary. It still matters to them and does underpin the decisions they make, but it's more about justifying themselves in the face of others.
Females in contrast take the "wrong body" type ideas very seriously, believing them reflexively and justifying their actions on that basis without any ulterior aims. For them, gender identity is more about aversion to being a woman, and not about satiating any particular desire -- beyond, of course, getting rid of "gender dysphoria".
Even the positively desired things are often not desirable in and of themselves, but rather as symbols; synecdoches for their assumed identities, confirmation of 'validity'. Male troon desires tits so that he can play with them and post (disgusting) lewds, the female troon wants top surgery scars so that she can know and show that she's really a "trans man" -- that she belongs, is valid etc.. They're only symbols.
The rigid medicalized view of "being trans" is also why so-called transmedicalists are mostly FtMs. Almost paradoxically, the lack of desire for trappings of masculinity and the importance of identity labeling is why you get "He/Him" girls wearing more make-up than a clown. Comparatively, Daniel Muscato type characters are much rarer amongst men, more often you just get lazy autists whose problem is mostly that they can't hack personal care in the first place, let alone the greater demands of female presentation.
Even among FtMs who do attempt to present as men, it is absurdly common to find them wistfully longing for when they'll be able to go back to dyeing their hair or wearing eye-liner. The idea being that while they're early in transition, they won't pass if they do feminine things, but once they have a pube beard then they can go back to wearing mascara and still pass. This is delusional in 2021, but they don't realize this apparently. Again, the contrast with MtFs is instructive. They don't think the make-up or w/e is a chore. They revel in it, it's the most 'euphoric' part of their otherwise miserable existence. Even if there is something they would like to be able to do, but "can't" it's not something masculine, rather it's something like get a pixie cut.
On a related tangent, I found this today:
Note the "born cis" -- she's not being philosophical:
I'm not even sure if your friend passes as a troon in that picture, or maybe my brain is just being scrambled by the electrolysis rash. I feel the hair, especially at the top just looks male, looks like what you'd expect on a guy that grew his hair out. The nose is very interesting as well -- uniquely shaped nostrils.
The actual presentation just seems like it's directly cribbed from some gender affirmative care handbook (or some reddit resource), and then made less grammatical. Did he have a bibliography?
If I had to guess, it's probably all from one source, but then combined with his own personal knowledge & experiences. I personally suspect that that the "don't ask transwomen to do their male voice" dot point was a conscious addition based on past experience. The surgery point may belong in the same category, but that's more generic. Neither of them are really relevant to pediatric care.
The lack of a theoretical basis is also standard in all gender affirming care narratives, at best you'll get some oblique reference to gender identity being "established" at 18 months or maybe to some Olson-Kennedy study about how gender non-conforming children are - get this - gender non-conforming with respect to their sex (this is peer-reviewed Science, you see). It's worth noting that the sense in which they mean "established" is hard to establish though. In fact, often they seem to stake out a position wherein gender is some sui generis form of identification that follows some predetermined (but unknowable) path. This is the ad hoc defense offered against the obvious fact that their patients' 'gender identities' do in fact commonly change.
In order to then justify the medical interventions they then just assert that non-affirmed patients are a high suicide risk. The evidence for this is literally internet surveys with poor data validation conducted by partisan organizations & individuals. This is also where the 41% statistic comes from. Many of the clinicians are quite conscious of the absurdity of their position, and I think that's what drives the impetus to trivialize the medical interventions they push. Hence, Olson-Kennedy's "if they want their breasts back later then they can just go get 'em re-attached" quip or the constant insistence on the benignity of puberty blockers.
He says that he cannot smell anymore - I imagine because of the plastic surgery ("facial feminising surgery") that makes his nose like that. He also said that he previously had meningitis and went cross-eyed for a few years. Was this brain damage a contributing factor??
There was no reference list at the end, though admittedly we did not finish the presentation because he ran over after 2 hours. No portion of the presentation was devoted to the outcomes of transitioning with regards to mental health. I will admit that I zoned out because it was so boring, but from my memory, the only message was "it's so hard to transition because all doctors are evil and gatekeep... you have to help them! No questions asked!"
In the Q&A section the speech therapist asked "I have transgender youth coming to me asking for help with changing their voice to be more feminine, I cannot do this, who do I refer to?" and my coworker says "it's so hard to find places, I found my voice coach online. It was an older MTF in USA." - are we to refer teenage boys to grown trans groomers???
I could go on for days about this coworker.
He shows up at 8:59 for a 9:00 appointment and immediately has to go to the toilet because of his ulcerative colitis. He wears jeans and open toed sandals to work every day. He goes on his phone DURING sessions (he is not treating anyone as he does not have registration, but still is observing others). He swears and uses adult language in front of the children. He has no social grace whatsoever - just lingering, walking into rooms without knocking, talking about himself, being boring. He makes personal comments, e.g. you can use a real life (impersonal) story to relate to kids "when I was young I also loved the sandpit, once I made a tunnel so long I stuck my leg into it", but don't make it personal "when I was your age I was bullied for having red hair, and it made me depressed". He uses his female voice - which is a croaky frog whisper which is impossible to understand, but then will shout "OH FUCK" in a deep booming MAN voice because ... he saw a bug ... in Australia....
He complains that he doesn't make any money TO CLIENTS and complains about having to come into work. This is an internship, and guess what buddy, it's NOT mandatory! Be grateful! He also brags that a relative died and left him with $20,000 in the bank. He lives with his mother and has braces at age 28. He complains that he's single in the country because there's no good lesbians about (a good reason for me to remain closeted at work). He wants to move to Sydney and hook up with all the sexy lesbos. Frankly, I don't think he cares about children at all.
Yeah we don't talk about vaginas the way men talk about dicks. And I've never talked about my clit to anyone in my life. So MTFs can start calling their dicks clits and sit around having a clit chat and its just another in the long list of things troons think women do, like having naked pillowfights at slumber parties while crying a lot and having full body orgasms
The Intersex Society of North America is now folded into a new org, but they were one of the biggest advocacy groups for people with intersex conditions for a long time.
Mostly the subject is about periods. The fact remains I've never heard women randomly bring up stuff about their clits. It's generally not a topic of conversation.
Mostly the subject is about periods. The fact remains I've never heard women randomly bring up stuff about their clits. It's generally not a topic of conversation.
I think a lot of that comes from discussing function/impact on life rather than specific anatomy. I don’t mind discussing with other women friends the fact that no, I will not be doing anything fun Saturday, it’s the first day of my period so imma be a bitch and in pain. We definitely will talk about wide-breadth issues caused under the umbrella of “woman’s anatomical dealio.” But I would feel immensely weird talking about a pea-sized organ used only for sexual pleasure.
Mostly the subject is about periods. The fact remains I've never heard women randomly bring up stuff about their clits. It's generally not a topic of conversation.
I agree on the last part, but it's the equating period talk to vaginas that I'm being a pedantic bastard on. Whilst the two are related, period talk is a weird one; it's not so much talking about privates as it is comparing physiological side effects. Particularly as a teenager, it's more about figuring out whether your weird medical issues are the norm. There's a lot more to a period than bleeding and there's a lot to worry about that isn't really spoken about except between friends. It's almost exactly the same feeling as chatting about that cold/flu that's been going around. There's a lot of "Did you get this too?" type discussion.
It's not really a conversation about genitals more what else is going on around them.
It's a very obvious tell for troons as you well know. So yeah, I agree with you, I just wouldn't put period talk in the same bracket as genital talk, they feel like two completely different universes to me.
