Ver archivo adjunto 2232419
I will never understand what any of this drivel means.
Isn't everyone "non-binary" by that definition?
How can you be a troon and also non-binary?
The more time I spend online, the more I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
This ideology is full of conative dissonance. None of it makes sense when you try and bring the concepts together. You can try and understand one concept, but then the next concept completely contradicts it. People just go with the flow, the basic ideas, follow without trying to understand it. There's no point, it's always changing.
A feature of these ideologies is that you don't question anything. Accept what is new today that wasn't yesterday.
Non-binary is an interesting one. For many of these people, they get sucked into identity politics to the point where they can't see anyone, even themselves outside of an identity group. Usually with strict and rigid ideas of what identity groups are. They look at their gender identity and notice it doesn't align with how they perceive themselves. Instead of reflecting on this misalignment. Understanding the problems with viewing people as identity groups. They just opt out of their identity group. Becoming non-binary or whatever new identity group that doesn't have all the negative attributes they associate with the binary gender ones.
It's also why some people with low on the hierarchy and victimhood hierarchies are often so keen on labelling off all their identities and intersectional identities. Woke man becomes non-binary to shun the toxic nature of being a male. Someone else will constantly refer to themselves as a disabled, black, queer, non-binary, non-neurotypical descendant of slaves. Or something like that. You get the gist. There's a game to placing yourself and your identities.
It's also why a lot of these people, despite being white become extremely anti-white. They can't change their skin color identity. Yet they can signal strongly they're not really one of the bad ones.
archive.ph
