- Registrado
- 19 de Abr, 2019
The only possible way that would happen is if we elect someone with Korean or Japanese ancestry.
You want anti-china? They have it in spades.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Iniciador del tema Randall Fragg
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
You want anti-china? They have it in spades.
- Registrado
- 10 de Ene, 2019
That's because these people are mentally ill and they deserve to have their own lives crumble down around them.
- Registrado
- 4 de Feb, 2018
- Registrado
- 24 de Dic, 2019
These fanfictions are getting lamer by the day.
Trump stood up to China which is way bigger and more relevant than Germany. Actually, would anybody be scared of Germany after what the last w war did to them?
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2019
But FDR didn’t go to war with Germany. Hitler declares war first, after the Japanese.
Mr Snek
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Dic, 2018
Wasn't joining the war extremely unpopular in America, to the point where the government had to actively avoid looking like they were supporting Britain? I barely have a surface level understanding of WW2 but even I know that America wanted little to do with stopping the Nazis until Pearl Harbor happened. At the very least, they probably wouldn't have joined in for a few more years if it hadn't happened anyway.
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2019
Yeah. The entire premise of the Monroe Doctrine was no European involvement in the Americas and vice versa.
- Registrado
- 30 de Jul, 2017
Also Eisenhower wasn't president at the time - he was a general. It's even in the original tweet.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2017
Roosevelt wanted to back Britain, but most of the country wanted fuck all do with Europe and its ills, especially after the first world war. London was a finance center, and most bankers including JP Morgan, also supported intervention on behalf of Britain (not least of all because Germany defaulted on its loans). Morgan helped come up with Lend-Lease.
(Coincidentally, wanting to stick his dick into WWII made Roosevelt stop his war on the banks)
Only once Pearl Harbor happened and everyone was clamoring for Nip blood did war with Germany become a popular idea.
And trump wouldn't have needed to go to war with Germany. He'd have destroyed
"@Literally_Hitler is being allowed to expand germany's borders at the cost of the wonderful Czech people, Stop. Britain should be ashamed to have a prime minister giving in to a man who can't grow a beard, Stop. His moustache is SAD, Stop. MANY SUCH CASES, Stop."
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2018
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2018
ONE PERSON DIED AND NOBODY WAS ARMED
- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2013
And knowing them, they'd justify that death in some way, assuming they haven't already.
- Registrado
- 17 de Dic, 2019
They have, gleefully asserting that the woman surrounded by riot officers had to be shot because she so much as leaned on a broken window.
- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2013
That... is very flimsy reasoning. By that logic, they should have shot more people because they were just standing there and breathing.
As much as I like to rag on the supporters for the protest, the people against it are by far the more simple-minded and one-sided of the debate seeing as they need to justify the death of someone who probably was just minding their own business.
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2018
One of the rioters and a cop. They both deserved it.
Something something Summer of Love...
Something something David Dorn...
... Minneapolis.
- Registrado
- 12 de Jul, 2019
I'd argue that BLM and Antifa burning down whole cities last summer in the name of a career criminal ODing on fentanyl while resisting arrest was WAY more bad than what they're whining about and won't shut up about, but I know they won't condemn left wing political violence (not that I'd call the capital walk-in "political violence") because "it's okay when WE do it."
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2018
The cop was days after and completely unrelated. The woman didn't deserve it as she was unarmed.
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2018
The whataboutism regarding the George Floyd riots and 1/6 shouldn't even exist in the first place. It's morally reprehensible to even declare that argument and compare the two. The more I hear about 1/6, the more desensitized I get of it even though I watched it live. Ignoring the absurd comparisons to the Civil War, 9/11, etc, I've also watched several cities burn nationwide in the name of social justice. Very little response from the media or government other than sheer justification of "peaceful protesting" and "racial injustice."
Objectively speaking, one event was worse than the other based on collateral damage, social impact and prolonged continuity. Both are abused for clout and fear mongering. In a just society, neither should have happened in the first place.
- Registrado
- 9 de Dic, 2015
Four assassinated presidents, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11 say hi.