Disaster Children are increasingly selling explicit content on OnlyFans: report - Teens are increasingly uploading their content onto OnlyFans, according to a troubling new report.

Link | Archive

By Hannah Sparks | May 27, 2021 | 2:49pm | Updated

Kids are using fraudulent personal details to sell explicit videos and imagery on OnlyFans.

A BBC News investigation has revealed a number of accounts launched by minors on the adult website, which boasts more than a million “creators” who share self-produced content to more than 120 million paid followers. In return, OnlyFans takes a 20% cut of all subscriptions.

Created in 2019, OnlyFans exploded in popularity last year, when many turned to the site as a financial lifeline during the pandemic.

The platform’s policy requires users to be over 18 years old and, in response to the BBC’s findings, insisted their verification process abides by regulatory requirements.

But the BBC uncovered reports of kids on the site as young as 12 years old. In one case, a 14-year-old used their grandmother’s passport to gain access to the site. And a 17-year-old in Nevada was featured in graphic videos posted to a legitimate adult account — his 18-year-old girlfriend’s — putting the account owner in violation of OnlyFans’ terms and conditions.

The BBC made their point when they used the ID of a 26-year-old to set up an account, demonstrating that anyone can steal personal details to bypass the verification process.

“Some of the girls have thousands of followers on Instagram, and they must be raking it in,” said one anonymous underage user. “I wanna be just like them.”
In a statement to The Post, an OnlyFans rep said the company “does not tolerate any violations of our policies and we immediately take action to uphold the safety and security of our users.” The company has shut down the accounts turned up by BBC.

Additionally, the rep said, though rare breaches occur, “The site has in-depth policies and procedures in place to proactively monitor any attempt to fraudulently access the platform and should there be any contravention of these terms, the account is immediately closed.”

The company also added that there are “multiple levels of checks in place to ensure that only verified content creators are onboarded,” including a team that manually checks IDs and applications.

However, reports from law enforcement in the US and UK, school administrators and other child-protection experts say the problem remains widespread. Meanwhile, anonymous caller notes from counselors from the UK’s Childline hotline support these allegations, with some also complaining that their images had turned up on the site without their consent.

At the same time, many of OnlyFans’ underage creators are allegedly victims of prior abuse, or suffer from mental illness, according to Childline. Some have even been identified as reportedly missing children.

“In 2019, there were around a dozen children known to be missing being linked with content on OnlyFans,” said Staca Shehan, vice president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). “Last year, the number of those cases nearly tripled.”

Last month, Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) released its annual report which identified 68,000 cases of “self-generated” imagery — meaning they volunteered the content — of children online. This marked a 77% increase over the previous year.

The BBC spoke to one such underage OnlyFans user, 17-year-old Leah, as well as her mother, Caitlyn. Leah began on the site using a fake driver’s license, and promised she would only post photos of her feet in exchange for money. But her content soon escalated into videos of masturbation and other sexual acts as followers pleaded for increasingly explicit content.

OnlyFans has claimed that Leah’s engagement was an “oversight,” although her fake license should have triggered their security system. They said her account was approved during a transition period when the site was moved “from one effective ID and age verification system to a new exceptionally effective” version.

The BBC’s test showed that the “new exceptionally effective” system would no longer accept a fake ID, but underage users could still use an adult’s real ID to gain access. While OnlyFans requires users to submit a photo posing with their ID — to confirm the faces match — this effort was allegedly not enough to detect the difference between a 17-year-old girl who used a 26-year-old’s ID to launch an account.

Even after a user reported Leah’s true age to the site’s moderators, her account was again deemed legitimate upon a follow-up review. OnlyFans only shut down her account after the BBC’s inquiry. The same was true for a number of other allegedly underage accounts uncovered by the BBC, many of which had already been reported to police.

Leah, who had a troubled childhood, according to her mother, regrets her OnlyFans fame.

“She won’t go out at all, really,” Caitlyn said. “She doesn’t want to be seen.”


OnlyFans and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
 
Epstein dies in August 2019
Onlyfans starts to take off in late 2019 into 2020.

It's almost like they offed him because they knew technology would make him obsolete.
 
Pornhub didn't hide behind the "feminism" and "empowerment" angle like Onlyfans does. I think it will be a lot harder to get rid of it.

Every big name smut peddling site or anyone else involved in or dependent on the sex industry industry hides behind that and has for ages, it's not unique to OF.

There was plenty of press after the PH crackdown defending them on those grounds, one article I saw claimed the "crusade" against PH was going to get someone (some whore) killed.

You still can't purchase anything from PH's premium service, everything that was sold there is still advertised but impossible to get. The card corps aren't giving back access for the foreseeable future without legislation that likely wouldn't even protect someone blacklisted for CP concerns, no amount of white knighting will save OF if a handful of higher-ups decide to nuke OF.
 
Every big name smut peddling site or anyone else involved in or dependent on the sex industry industry hides behind that and has for ages, it's not unique to OF.

There was plenty of press after the PH crackdown defending them on those grounds, one article I saw claimed the "crusade" against PH was going to get someone (some whore) killed.

You still can't purchase anything from PH's premium service, everything that was sold there is still advertised but impossible to get. The card corps aren't giving back access for the foreseeable future without legislation that likely wouldn't even protect someone blacklisted for CP concerns, no amount of white knighting will save OF if a handful of higher-ups decide to nuke OF.
The difference between onlyfans and any other porn site is that on of the whores themselves upload the content and not some corporation or some random dude. That's what fucked over pornhub, as far as I understand it anyway. It's going to be harder to get people angry over someone exploiting women and children when it's the women and children themselves uploading and profits of the content.
 
Children are uploading porn of themselves for fucking peanuts. If these kids got real jobs instead they'd make more. Remember that 180/month number is the average, I think it includes the top 1%, who are statistical outliers.

$145 a month or less. That's how much your nudes are worth.
Sure but that $145 per month is for taking 1 selfie per day.
Not for 30+ hours per week of washing dishes or flipping burgers... for taking 1 selfie per day.
You can even have a full time job on top of that because it literally takes 5 seconds to do.
 
Didn't OnlyFans start encouraging whoredom after some guy in the porn industry bought out most of it?

Edit: OnlyFans was launched in 2016[10] as a platform for performers to provide clips and photos to followers for a monthly subscription fee. The parent company is Fenix International Ltd.[7] Two years later, Leonid Radvinsky, owner of MyFreeCams, acquired 75% ownership of Fenix and became its director.

Found on their Wikipedia page
 
If OF is nuked it will just be replaced by something else. It probably already has started to get some competition. The only real solution is to make the bulk of the internet 18 and up only but the logistics of making that happen and how it will screw over everyone else makes it probably impossible
 
The difference between onlyfans and any other porn site is that on of the whores themselves upload the content and not some corporation or some random dude.
OF and other porn sites are actually the exact same in that regard. PH, for example, was/is lax in enforcing DMCA claims because they benefitted from the ad revenue generated from the pages of the videos that randos uploaded.

Where OF is different is in their insistence on a subscription model, in contrast to PH and other tube sites that operated like, well, Youtube but for porn.
 
This is a problem that's only going to get worse. These are the consequences of no slut-shaming, encouraging promiscuity, the over-sexualization of younger and younger girls, and the normalization and ease of access to the most hardcore, depraved pornography available at the click of a button. When the TikTok stars these girls idolize all start selling nudes, and raking in tons of money (so they claim, even though, as we've seen, you'd make more working at McDank's for a month), it's no wonder these young girls get the idea in their heads to become turbo thots for, what they see, as easy money. I hope all those twitter feminists chanting "NORMALIZE SEX WORK," and "NO SLUT-SHAMING," are fucking proud of themselves
 
This is a problem that's only going to get worse. These are the consequences of no slut-shaming, encouraging promiscuity, the over-sexualization of younger and younger girls, and the normalization and ease of access to the most hardcore, depraved pornography available at the click of a button. When the TikTok stars these girls idolize all start selling nudes, and raking in tons of money (so they claim, even though, as we've seen, you'd make more working at McDank's for a month), it's no wonder these young girls get the idea in their heads to become turbo thots for, what they see, as easy money. I hope all those twitter feminists chanting "NORMALIZE SEX WORK," and "NO SLUT-SHAMING," are fucking proud of themselves
So 12 year old girls either chop off their nonexistent tits and fuck up their puberty going by "Ayden" OR become an underage digital prostitute.

Fucking wonderful.
 
And a 17-year-old in Nevada was featured in graphic videos posted to a legitimate adult account — his 18-year-old girlfriend’s — putting the account owner in violation of OnlyFans’ terms and conditions.
... It also makes them a child pornographer in violation of the law, but I guess that's less important for the NYPost and Hannah Sparks than violating the Term & Condition.
 
This is a problem that's only going to get worse. These are the consequences of no slut-shaming, encouraging promiscuity, the over-sexualization of younger and younger girls, and the normalization and ease of access to the most hardcore, depraved pornography available at the click of a button. When the TikTok stars these girls idolize all start selling nudes, and raking in tons of money (so they claim, even though, as we've seen, you'd make more working at McDank's for a month), it's no wonder these young girls get the idea in their heads to become turbo thots for, what they see, as easy money. I hope all those twitter feminists chanting "NORMALIZE SEX WORK," and "NO SLUT-SHAMING," are fucking proud of themselves
Even if these whores made the money they claimed, they're consumerist retards who spend it all on retarded tacky shit they don't need.
So 12 year old girls either chop off their nonexistent tits and fuck up their puberty going by "Ayden" OR become an underage digital prostitute.

Fucking wonderful.
The modern world is amazing!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo