💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Weren't they the werewolf rape comic guys? That had the controversy surrounding it.
yeh

dickwolf1.jpg dickwolf3.PNG dickwolf2.jpg


dickwolf4.PNG

dickwolves.jpg


lol academia:

Hypermasculinity & Dickwolves The Invisibility of Women in the New Gaming
 
Última edición:
Aside from the content of his comics, which some people will like and others will not, has StoneToss done anything on a personal level that is LOLcow worthy? What, outside of the content of his comics, makes him a LOLcow?
The OP is right there, dude. Transcribe some of his comics into a a forum post and they would blend right in on incels.is.

Also, Null's the one who decided the guy was a cow. If you have a problem, take it up with him.
 
Prediction: it's not going to get a real answer. Because that's not the real issue that @Bani was trying to address.

Just read what he wrote. I'm going to be real for a moment and say I think at the core @Bani is annoyed that some people express genuine like of stonetoss. This bothers him because in his mind they let slip their mask of perfect ironic detachment. That's what I see when I read his post. You're allowed to like his content, but not in this thread!

You know when people were buttblasted that stonetoss got a thread it was pretty funny. Stonetoss isn't a lolcow! Remove the thread! Most of those posts were moved to spergatory a seperate thread. And then when people get angry that people might express appreciation for stonetoss, that's funny too. Why does that bother anyone? Lol, I just don't get that.
Imagine if this was peoples' attitude towards thirst-posting, like if someone was sperging about wanting to fuck Momokun in her thread. Say a handful of newfags come in and start throwing giant temper tantrums about how they think Moo isn't a cow, interspersed with posts about how bad they want to fuck her. Then someone comes in and says, "Hey autists, this thread isn't for drooling over Momokun, it's for ridiculing her." Then some autist (read: you) goes, "Y-you guys are just mad people want to fuck her!!1! You're angry that people are expressing appreciation for her!!1!"

You see how retarded that is, right? You're letting your personal bias towards a cow dictate the direction of the thread, and sperging out when people tell you that's not what cow threads are for. It's a pain in the ass to read a thread that's 80% simping for the cow and 20% actual content. And now I'm contributing to the problem by arguing with you guys, further shitting up a thread that's already a dumpster fire.

Any and all antifa stonetoss edits are made immediately unfunny
FTFY
 
More innocent times. I remember how people mostly rolled their eyes and made fun of the (few) people bitching about it. Little did we know just how bad it would get...
If we'd known what was coming, we should have just doxed and viciously life-ruined every single person involved in that bullshit, so they'd have learned a lesson.
 
Imagine if this was peoples' attitude towards thirst-posting, like if someone was sperging about wanting to fuck Momokun in her thread. Say a handful of newfags come in and start throwing giant temper tantrums about how they think Moo isn't a cow, interspersed with posts about how bad they want to fuck her. Then someone comes in and says, "Hey autists, this thread isn't for drooling over Momokun, it's for ridiculing her." Then some autist (read: you) goes, "Y-you guys are just mad people want to fuck her!!1! You're angry that people are expressing appreciation for her!!1!"

You see how retarded that is, right? You're letting your personal bias towards a cow dictate the direction of the thread, and sperging out when people tell you that's not what cow threads are for. It's a pain in the ass to read a thread that's 80% simping for the cow and 20% actual content.
If you can't handle people having different opinions about a threads subject while discussing it, there's always lolcow.farms.
And now I'm contributing to the problem by arguing with you guys, further shitting up a thread that's already a dumpster fire.
So close to self-aware yet so far.
 
If we'd known what was coming, we should have just doxed and viciously life-ruined every single person involved in that bullshit, so they'd have learned a lesson.
Or better yet just DDOS'd the hell out of Tumblr during its heyday.

If you can't handle people having different opinions about a threads subject while discussing it, there's always lolcow.farms.
Truly the words of someone who's never used LCF.
 
Say a handful of newfags come in and start throwing giant temper tantrums
Who's throwing the tantrum here?

Then some autist (read: you) goes, "Y-you guys are just mad people want to fuck her!!1! You're angry that people are expressing appreciation for her!!1!"
I'll throw you a bone and give you a serious and non-ridiculing response.

Yeah, if people kept saying they want to fuck stonetoss, that'd be pretty annoying. As we stand I think the biggest endorsement was one person saying they like one in four of his comics?

So this thing is more like one guy commenting "nice tits" and then a couple of girls getting angry over how they're saggy, and ugly and people shouldn't say she has nice tits in a lolcow thread.


So let's look at your discontent more seriously. You say that threads should only be about ridicule. You imply that only newfags wouldn't get that that is the point of lolcow threads. Yet if you go back into the archives, you'll see plenty of deviations from this. Null expresses his enjoyment of Emily Youris' early content. Threads like early sargon or ethan ralph are more appreciative than negative. This is stuff going right up until your signup date. It wasn't until they started acting more like retards that people started laughing more at them than with them. Metokur is another example where the people that hate him are just more lolcowish than the person of interest. Besides selling out, he never did much dumb shit.

At its core I don't think threads are there to ridicule people; that would imply lolcows need help. That they would only become ridiculous because of the active participation of kiwifarmers. Instead, I'd say threads are there to laugh at the dumbest shit in the world. And sometimes bad attempts at trying to ridicule are funnier than the antics of the supposed cow.

And to continue to be serious for a second, I think it also comes down to a different worldview. Like if I read the OP, as you suggested, I see the comic about the having skeeted on things and I see a funny observation about how we don't want anything other people have ejaculated on, except if it's a girl.

But somehow the OP interprets that as saying a girl is an object, a mattress. The comic is saying the exact opposite. And part of the reason for that disconnect between OP's interpretation and what I think some others see, is that I don't think it's the worst thing to have a prefference for less promiscuous people. That's why the comic doesn't annoy me the way it would annoy someone who thinks critizing promiscuity is rape culture or something like that. This is already close to overthinking it, but I'm trying to explain why other people view these comics differently. It goes a step further, they're laughing at the impulse in themselves to not be discerning in what partner they choose. And I think in OP's mind it goes to "incel thinks women are objects!" because there is an undercurrent of judging women/men on promiscuity.

I don't know if that's what you agreed with OP on, I have to take a stab in the dark because you're unable or unwilling to say why you think stonetoss is a cow.

He probably is in some ways. If you've got anything good, post it.

Why does it make you so angry if people laugh at some of his jokes? If someone like you were running the site, I'd probably feel like this guy:

fbi-memes-comic.png


You're letting your personal bias towards a cow dictate the direction of the thread

I think looking in the mirror would be helpful. In case it's unclear, you're trying to dictate the thread to confirm to your bias. People ask you why you think what you think and all you could say is "read OP".

More innocent times. I remember how people mostly rolled their eyes and made fun of the (few) people bitching about it. Little did we know just how bad it would get...
Pretty much ground zero too. Penny arcade wanted to fix game journalism and hired ben kuchera to start their own reviewing site. Eron Gjoni's post hit the penny arcade forums before it hit the chans.
 
Última edición:
Imagine if this was peoples' attitude towards thirst-posting, like if someone was sperging about wanting to fuck Momokun in her thread. Say a handful of newfags come in and start throwing giant temper tantrums about how they think Moo isn't a cow, interspersed with posts about how bad they want to fuck her. Then someone comes in and says, "Hey autists, this thread isn't for drooling over Momokun, it's for ridiculing her." Then some autist (read: you) goes, "Y-you guys are just mad people want to fuck her!!1! You're angry that people are expressing appreciation for her!!1!"

You see how retarded that is, right? You're letting your personal bias towards a cow dictate the direction of the thread, and sperging out when people tell you that's not what cow threads are for. It's a pain in the ass to read a thread that's 80% simping for the cow and 20% actual content. And now I'm contributing to the problem by arguing with you guys, further shitting up a thread that's already a dumpster fire.
Go back to the first page of this thread. The OP was utter shit and clearly politically motivated more than it was an indication of a worthwhile cow. Nearly everyone (except Null apparently) was in agreement that stonetoss is not a cow, yet he pushed the thread through anyway. You're just angry that people ended up enjoying the milk from stonetoss' orbiters more than stonetoss himself.

If you really hate the existence of this thread so much, blame Null.
 
Nearly everyone (except Null apparently) was in agreement that stonetoss is not a cow, yet he pushed the thread through anyway

Just to remind people: null never called stonetoss a cow, just said that people shouldn't be so goddamn sensitive and that a cartoonist is not beyond criticism.

He was right to push through the thread.
 
Becoming the amogus guy broke this dude on some level. Not in like a depression spiral way but in a "yessss amongus yesssss" way. It's funny seeing how he obsessively has been putting amongus into pretty much every single one of his comics now. On top of that the people that thought he'd be mad if they spammed him with amongus and got the opposite reaction are fucking ripping their hair out over the monster they've unleashed. I keep thinking about this shit or being reminded of it on occasion and for real this thread has every fucking right to exist cause weird shit like this happens involving this dude with the cursed blob people comic.
 
Go back to the first page of this thread. The OP was utter shit and clearly politically motivated more than it was an indication of a worthwhile cow. Nearly everyone (except Null apparently) was in agreement that stonetoss is not a cow, yet he pushed the thread through anyway. You're just angry that people ended up enjoying the milk from stonetoss' orbiters more than stonetoss himself.

If you really hate the existence of this thread so much, blame Null.
Jeeze what are you, a nazi?
 
Imagine if this was peoples' attitude towards thirst-posting, like if someone was sperging about wanting to fuck Momokun in her thread. Say a handful of newfags come in and start throwing giant temper tantrums about how they think Moo isn't a cow, interspersed with posts about how bad they want to fuck her. Then someone comes in and says, "Hey autists, this thread isn't for drooling over Momokun, it's for ridiculing her." Then some autist (read: you) goes, "Y-you guys are just mad people want to fuck her!!1! You're angry that people are expressing appreciation for her!!1!"

You see how retarded that is, right? You're letting your personal bias towards a cow dictate the direction of the thread, and sperging out when people tell you that's not what cow threads are for. It's a pain in the ass to read a thread that's 80% simping for the cow and 20% actual content. And now I'm contributing to the problem by arguing with you guys, further shitting up a thread that's already a dumpster fire.


FTFY
You're gonna feel really stupid when it turns out Stonetoss is a black chick and then I fuck her and we get married.
 
If you can't handle people having different opinions about a threads subject while discussing it, there's always lolcow.farms.

So close to self-aware yet so far.
Who's throwing the tantrum here?


I'll throw you a bone and give you a serious and non-ridiculing response.

Yeah, if people kept saying they want to fuck stonetoss, that'd be pretty annoying. As we stand I think the biggest endorsement was one person saying they like one in four of his comics?

So this thing is more like one guy commenting "nice tits" and then a couple of girls getting angry over how they're saggy, and ugly and people shouldn't say she has nice tits in a lolcow thread.


So let's look at your discontent more seriously. You say that threads should only be a about ridicule. You imply that only newfags wouldn't get that is the point of lolcow threads. Yet if you go back into the archives and you see plenty of deviations from this. Null expresses his enjoyment of Emily Youris' early content. Threads like early sargon or ethan ralph are more appreciative than negative. This is stuff going right up until your signup date. It wasn't until they started acting more like retards that people started laughing more at them than with them. Metokur is another example where the people that hate him are just more lolcowish than the person of interest. Besides selling out, he never did much dumb shit.

At its core I don't think threads are there to ridicule people; that would imply lolcows need help. That they only become ridiculous because of the active participation of kiwifarmers. I'd say threads are there to laugh at the dumbest shit in the world. And sometimes bad attempts at trying to ridicule are funnier than the antics of the supposed cow.

And to continue to be serious for a second, I think it also comes down to a different worldview. Like if I read the OP, as you suggested, I see the comic about the having skeeted on things and I see a funny observation about how we don't want anything other people have ejaculated on, except if it's a girl.

But somehow the OP interprets that as saying a girl is an object, a mattress. The comic is saying the exact opposite. And part of the reason for that disconnect between OP's interpretation and what I think some others see, is that I don't think it's the worst thing to have a prefference for less promiscuous people. That's why the comic doesn't annoy me the way it would annoy someone who thinks critizing promiscuity is rape culture or something like that. This is already close to overthinking it, but I'm trying to explain why other people view these comics differently. It goes a step further, they're laughing at the impulse in themselves to not be discerning in what partner they choose. And I think in OP's mind it goes to "incel thinks women are objects!" because there is an undercurrent of judging women/men on promiscuity.

I don't know if that's what you agreed with OP on, I have to take a stab in the dark because you're unable or unwilling to say why you think stonetoss is a cow.

He probably is in some ways. If you've got anything good, post it.

Why does it make you so angry if people laugh at some of his jokes? If someone like you were running the site, I'd probably feel like this guy:

Ver archivo adjunto 2147239




I think looking in the mirror would be helpful. In case it's unclear, you're trying to dictate the thread to confirm to your bias. People ask you why you think what you think and all you could say is "read OP".


Pretty much ground zero too. Penny arcade wanted to fix game journalism and hired ben kuchera to start their own reviewing site. Eron Gjoni's post hit the penny arcade forums before it hit the chans.
Go back to the first page of this thread. The OP was utter shit and clearly politically motivated more than it was an indication of a worthwhile cow. Nearly everyone (except Null apparently) was in agreement that stonetoss is not a cow, yet he pushed the thread through anyway. You're just angry that people ended up enjoying the milk from stonetoss' orbiters more than stonetoss himself.

If you really hate the existence of this thread so much, blame Null.
You're gonna feel really stupid when it turns out Stonetoss is a black chick and then I fuck her and we get married.
What you idiots don't understand that is that Stonetoss doesn't 100% agree with me politically (I presume) and seeing everyone suck his dick makes me narc rage. Besides he made that comic that one time that didn't make me shit bricks and piss through my nose which makes him a fucking hack and a shitty cartoonist which makes him a massive lolcow on the levels of CWC himself.

No, I'm not mad, you are. Go read about the purpose of this site. Daddy Null agrees with me too. Daddy Null can you threadban everyone who doesn't agree with me? thaaaaaaaanks!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo