💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

[Haint]

If you look at Nick's audience at AFPAC, most of them have pretty wealthy parents. You get a trust fund vibe from most of them. The whole thing is a giant larp for Nick and his audience. Not one of them has even donated to a charity, civic service, or volunteered, it's just blatant grift. We live in an age where you can start a not-for-profit that revolves around yelling at a monitor in your parents basement for an audience desperate larping NEETs on the internet.

So there IS a definite trust fund vibe going on. Mentioned this about Nicky earlier. Young, inexperienced at life wanna be political punks, with their hand out for daddies money and any other fool dumb enough to simp for them.

 

[ciarraighe_ocosgraigh]

Ver archivo adjunto 2012105
Can't donate $1,000,001.

That's me out then.

 

[StefanBerkanov]

So there IS a definite trust fund vibe going on. Mentioned this about Nicky earlier. Young, inexperienced at life wanna be political punks, with their hand out for daddies money and any other fool dumb enough to simp for them.

I definitely get a trust fund vibe from Nick's base, but Nick himself? Not much. He's living in mother's basement and is daddy(less). Obviously he's been making bank from all the dimwits, which makes living with his mummy all the more sad.

 

[What has to be done]

I definitely get a trust fund vibe from Nick's base, but Nick himself? Not much. He's living in mother's basement and is daddy(less). Obviously he's been making bank from all the dimwits, which makes living with his mummy all the more sad.

Nick drove to AFPAC with his dad, who was pictured in the thread. Also, he bought a house very recently.

Do these people believe that smashing the screen will destroy the data in the phone?

Some force could easily destroy hard disk drives, but solid state memory could be much more difficult to keep out of the hands of someone trying to physically take it. I remember discussions of making thermite years ago for the purpose of destroying your own computer, but I was not knowledgeable enough at the time to know whether those were bullshit.

 

[kiwifarmsfan1]

Some force could easily destroy hard disk drives, but solid state memory could be much more difficult to keep out of the hands of someone trying to physically take it. I remember discussions of making thermite years ago for the purpose of destroying your own computer, but I was not knowledgeable enough at the time to know whether those were bullshit.

You'll need at least thermal destruction, most types of flash memory have 3 levels of error correction, this makes them resistant even to radiation. https://www.delkin.com/blog/the-effects-of-radiation-on-nand-flash-based-devices/

Irradiating it like microwaving it or heating it not past a temperature that is dependent on the material and construction would mean the data would likely be recoverable depending on the sophistication of the data salvage operation. Degaussing would probably be a safer bet as currents would form in the cells that would fry things.

Grinding it to dust would work as well, but a modest physics lab with a focus towards solid state electronics would likely be able to recover from just shattering of the flash memory.

A way to visualize it is radiation or heat causes a document to have more and more misspelled words to the point it eventually becomes gibberish, but only if you do it long enough or with enough energy, otherwise enough of the words will be intact allowing you figure out what was written. A couple seconds in the microwave might lead to a couple misspelled words for example, or no problems at all.

Most of this applies to hard disk platters as well, but they are much more difficult to recover if they have been shattered or exposed to the environment.

 

[AltisticRight]

Grinding it to dust would work as well, but a modest physics lab with a focus towards solid state electronics would likely be able to recover from just shattering of the flash memory.

I'd say grind it to dust and flush it down the toilet or dissolve the thing in acid. Neither is that difficult and both seem surefire to me.

 

[StBonaventureFren]

I definitely get a trust fund vibe from Nick's base, but Nick himself? Not much. He's living in mother's basement and is daddy(less). Obviously he's been making bank from all the dimwits, which makes living with his mummy all the more sad.

Fedentes's old man bought him a house, which was covered a couple dozen posts back. Nickelodeon also takes any opportunity to shid on normal wage earners, which is doubly interesting given that he would always retreat to "optics" and supposedly is leading a Right Wing movement for workers.

He comes off as the spoiled rotten morano mix because he is exactly that. Having never worked a day in his life or apparently lifted anything heavier than a Bic Mac, he is like a central casting conception of what a nemesis would be. So I'd file him squarely in the "upper middle class/trust fund kid" category.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

I'd say grind it to dust and flush it down the toilet or dissolve the thing in acid. Neither is that difficult and both seem surefire to me.

I think it would be simultaneously hilarious and sad when the government spends millions of dollars trawling river bottoms for hundreds of miles to find a phone to see if you called someone a nigger or not. In current year + 6, they would not only do that but think it virtuous to do so.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

What Nick doesn't understand is that 96.9% of 2016 Trump voters voted for Romney in 2012. Accounting for US population increase 2012-2016 (2.9%), you'll see that it was all fake from the start. Literally every single "#DrainTheSwamp #FuckRINOs #Qanon" boomers was a neocon just a few years ago, and will be so again. Not to "both sides" this, but the GOP base is just as partisan as the Dems. At CPAC, the audience cheered Rand Paul when he praised Trump for not bombing Syria, then Mike Pompeo spoke and the audience cheered for him praising Trump for... indeed bombing Syria.

To be fair, Romney wasn't quite out in the open about being a conservacuck in 2012 as he is now. He actually supported constitutional amendments that would limit marriage between a man and a woman, and in 2008 he had Joe Arpaio on his campaign team as an advisor, and he actually supported Kris Kobach's policies in 2012, publicly praising him. He was actually relatively conservative on his face while campaigning. You had to actually pay attention to his liberal history in Massachusetts to know that it was a lie. And of course after he lost, he became more and more liberal over time until he is basically a neolib today. I think he was like that all along of course, but back then he at least pretended.

Difference now is I think a lot of republican voters are so tired of being lied to, and Trump at the least exposed the repub machine as being all about votes with no principles. We'll see if this holds up in 2022 and 2024, but I do have some hope that a large number of trump voters will not vote for someone who is not America First, at least partially. Immigration reform who knows.

 

[Mepsi Pax]

What Nick doesn't understand is that 96.9% of 2016 Trump voters voted for Romney in 2012.

Where's that number come from?

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

I agree, Kris Kobach is the best case scenario. Kobach had some successes under his belt until he started pushing for actual immigration reform at a national level, at which point they fucked him over as hard as they could. In spite of that, he would occasionally win some primaries, at which point the GOP, including Trump, would back the Democrat or various independents whose sole job was fucking Kobach out of a victory.

Kobach was probably the only true viable America First candidate with a strong future and got fucked with by the GOP every way possible. The last time you had someone like Kobach was Pat Buchanan who had a great 1992 primary run but once again got fucked with every step of the way. Until they became radioactive. This is what will happen to any of the AF candidates, but they will never come close to sniffing at the type of relevance of a Buchanan or Kobach, so it’s a moot point in the first place.

 

[Esoteric Demonic Democrat]

I've noticed a lack of archives of old Nick content from late 2017-2018. Especially from his company America First Media.

I found this channel that has some of the Nationalist Review episodes. I'd recommend someone download all of the videos off of that channel as it'll probably be deleted at any moment and it does have some good videos on it. Anyone know where there are more episodes?

The videos and podcasts I'm interested in the most is one episode of Nationalist Review in which Nick and Richard Spencer get into it. You'll hear it brought up in old videos and by "oldfags of AF" but I've never seen it. I'm also interested in James Allsup's video in which he defends himself regarding the whole "firing" Nick thing. He mentions it containing DMs in this stream. I didn't write down a timestamp but it's mentioned like 25 mins in if I had to guess. It's called "The Truth About America First Media." Dead link.

There's also a Periscope of Nick airing out this drama, but only 5 minutes of it remain on a website called "Angry White Men." Terrible name for a website when your writing an article about a Mexican and a HAPA having a slapfight. Here is the dead link from the Periscope. It's been backed up on IA, but I have no idea how to recover Twitter videos... That is if IA backed up the video, I know sometimes it glitches out and doesn't back it up.

Perhaps a lot of this has already been found and backed-up by this thread, but this thread is a total shitshow and I'm not digging through 300 pages of arguing whether Nick is a fed or if he's gay.

 

[Puck]

I did the math in my head the first time. Here's the corrected.

2016 Trump Voters Who:

Voted for Romney: 96.7%

Voted for Romney (accounting for population increase over the 4 years): 99.1%

The Romney votes inevitably include NeverTrumpers who voted for Hillary; however, they were only 0.0792324% of the vote (massively overhyped by the media lol) and are therefore statistically irrelevant.

EDIT: I assumed a 4% Romney--> Hillary/Libertarian/not voting pipeline, it was actually 2% LMAO. Not gonna redo my math but the point is that NeverTrumpers/LincolnPedos/Shapiros are completely irrelevant and should be ignored for the FAGGOTS they are.

That "irrelevant" 2% flipped Georgia, Pennsylvania, and several other states to Biden.

They're actually more important to the Republicans than the AF retards will ever be. Those guys are actually willing to vote for the Democrats unlike Nick and his cult, who will hapily bend over and vote for the Romney types every election or at best just not vote.

 

[StefanBerkanov]

Fedentes's old man bought him a house, which was covered a couple dozen posts back. Nickelodeon also takes any opportunity to shid on normal wage earners, which is doubly interesting given that he would always retreat to "optics" and supposedly is leading a Right Wing movement for workers.

He comes off as the spoiled rotten morano mix because he is exactly that. Having never worked a day in his life or apparently lifted anything heavier than a Bic Mac, he is like a central casting conception of what a nemesis would be. So I'd file him squarely in the "upper middle class/trust fund kid" category.

Oh shit, thanks for the information. My opinion has definitely changed now, still is pretty sad he earns so much from retards and then makes his father buy a house for him LMAO.

 

[Terrorist]

I'm very excited that America First has taken its electoral strategy to the next level. According to my inside source, here's the slate of candidates:

• Dielawn Chaggot Volk. PLATFORM: Pepper spraying 12 year old girls should be legal if they play softball or some other varsity sport, QUOTE ME ACCURATELY.
• Laura Loomer. PLATFORM: Tire security, not buying Sabra hummus should be a federal crime.
• Nikiboo Troonenblatt. PLATFORM: The pinkpill, Make Autogynephilia Great Again, fuck other men & jerk off to animu children to own the femoids.
• Lucas Spacegiko. PLATFORM: Grooming teens from The Lucas Room is OK if you post cross emojis, being an Arab with fucked up gyno tits is nothing to be ashamed of either.
• Chicken Andy. PLATFORM: Barely avoiding choking to death on his own vomit (good metaphor for America rn if you think about it).
• Salmon Andy. PLATFORM: Shitting on more DNC driveways.
• Beardson Seal of Approval (TM) Certified Heterosexual Milo Yionnopoulos. PLATFORM: Send a consistent stream of sexually confused young men to his secluded ranch to be "ministered to" by him and his negro "brother".
• Beardo Queerdo Beardson. PLATFORM: Being a midget with a fat Jewish wife.
• Amanda May Morris. PLATFORM: Nuanced discussion about the age of consent.
• Ethan Ralph. PLATFORM: Joshua Conner Moon has a broken penis.
• Shannon Gaines. PLATFORM: Having a girl's name, excellence in the custodial field.

America First is inevitable!

 

[GuntN7]

• Shannon Gaines. PLATFORM: Having a girl's name, excellence in the custodial field.

America First is inevitable!

hits the soundboard
AMERICA IS SAVED!!!

 

[AltisticRight]

I did the math in my head the first time. Here's the corrected.

2016 Trump Voters Who:

Voted for Romney: 96.7%

Voted for Romney (accounting for population increase over the 4 years): 99.1%

The Romney votes inevitably include NeverTrumpers who voted for Hillary; however, they were only 0.0792324% of the vote (massively overhyped by the media lol) and are therefore statistically irrelevant.

EDIT: I assumed a 4% Romney--> Hillary/Libertarian/not voting pipeline, it was actually 2% LMAO. Not gonna redo my math but the point is that NeverTrumpers/LincolnPedos/Shapiros are completely irrelevant and should be ignored for the FAGGOTS they are.

Hmmmm, interesting.

2012: 59,134,475 Red
2016: 62,984,825 Trump
Never Trump republican types like Benny Shapiro can indeed be ignored.

Florida (as a reference, they were Blue in 2012, note that all Floridan votes are definitely counted, you'll know why a bit later)
2012: 4,235,270
2016: 4,617,886

Around 4 million turn 18 each year, it's also said that 2.5 million die each year due to various reasons. This can't really be used because of some virus and different sources use different measures, but whatever. Of course, only citizens can vote (lol). So let's just say each year, there's 2 million extra voters. 4 gives 8 million. Assume 50% swings red, that's more or less the same once the 4 million is added to 2012 numbers.

It's hard to calculate the number of overt neocons because searching for it results in garbage sources. Rubbish sites like Conservopedia and RationalWiki (I wish there's a way to remove them from search results) come first, then your standard "83278487258242453295 reasons Jews are bad" types.

So if we assume the neocon population more or less stayed the same, then yes, people who voted for Romney also voted for Trump. Those who didn't were just huge outliers.

We run into a new problem. Trump won the electoral college before all the votes were counted, right? People love talking about Hillary's popular vote, but most intentionally ignore this tiny pesky detail. Journalists know as much about statistics as a street hobo, but similar to a hobo, they are good at lying (lying down VS lying to us, get it? Alright, this joke was cringe, I'll eat a bullet).

Did Trump Actually Get Fewer Votes Than Mitt Romney? | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Stories claiming that Donald Trump not only got fewer popular votes than Hillary Clinton, but fewer votes than Mitt Romney did in 2012, are all wrong.

www.investors.com

As of this writing, Clinton has 60.1 million votes to Trump's 59.8 million, according to CNN. But if you look closely at the table on the CNN website, there's a little notation in the corner informing readers that only 93% of the ballots have been counted. (UPDATE: CNN has since removed that notation.)

After doing a little math, that means that there could be roughly 9.5 million votes are still outstanding.

So assuming the distribution is similar (no, it's not, depends on the state), obviously Trump would still be behind Hillary regarding the popular vote at a surface's glance, but it's more or less very similar, certainly not 3 million in differences. If the numbers are really crunched out, and if voting illegals (70% illegals vote Democrat, by the way) are tallied out, then Trump might have won even the popular vote.

Anyway, yeah. Your conclusion stands. Most Romney voters also voted for Trump, so did most ziocon boomer and qtard types.

 

[AltisticRight]

My 2/4% "Never Trump Republicans" came from 10 polls regarding Trump's Republican disapproval rating from Nov 2016 --> Jan 30 2017. One can't just go off voter data since people like Ben Shapiro didn't vote. Irregardless, it really shows just how overhyped they've been by the media for the last 5 years when they are <0.1% of the vote (and, not that I included it, massively disproportionately rich, literal donor neocons lol, not the base)

Polling is also a shit form of number gathering. The appropriate method will be population sampling, preferably derived from several questions.

But of course the MSM is too lazy to bake up something scientifically sound, they'd rather hype up stories based on a yes or no tick box. Using disapproval rates is even dumber. I disapprove of most Scotty's shit but I'm still going to support the libs over Labor. I like many One Nation's policies (more than Liberals) but I'll likely never vote for them.

 

[SchoolsRapeKids]

Those guys are actually willing to vote for the Democrats unlike Nick and his cult, who will hapily bend over and vote for the Romney types every election or at best just not vote.

Nick claims responsibility for both Republican senators losing in Georgia

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

Regarding Trump vs. Romney, there’s some interesting insights here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/realsp...-clintons-votes-stack-up-to-obama-and-romney/

This map shows where the gains come from. Losing lots of votes from Utah isn’t surprising but you see a lot of Trump’s gains come from the rust belt, which is what cinched the election for him. Trump won on razor thin margins in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

A lot of magatards pretend 2016 was such a smash victory but it wasn’t. Trump talked about doing something about immigration, trade, infrastructure and the opiate addiction crisis, things that were just written off as inevitabilities by Obama. Notice that those three states flipped back to Biden. Trump doing little or nothing about those issues is what cost him those states and the election.