- Registrado
- 8 de Jul, 2015
"Mental Health Volunteer" sounds as much as a recipe for disaster as "Self-Taught Orthopedic Surgeon" does.
💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)
- Iniciador del tema Null
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
- Registrado
- 10 de Feb, 2015
Bad drawing and bad math. Frank Miller's iconic Batman stories were written in the 80s and his All-Star Batman was widely panned. Has Dobby even read any Batman in the last 15 years? He seems completely unaware of current Batman.
Who am I kidding? Dobby do research lol
Who am I kidding? Dobby do research lol
- Registrado
- 23 de Dic, 2013
Today's Dobbo Patreon update:
In case you think the final comparison is too harsh, just remember: This is the Batman that kills, uses a machine gun, drives around in a Tank running over innocent bystanders, kidnaps a 12 year old boy, forces said boy to eat rats, beats the crap out of Green Lantern, steals his Lantern Corps Ring, calls people retarded, tortures people indiscriminately, and slaps around women.
DC characters are iconic and idealized. They are characters you are suppose to want to be (For Example: the recent "Be the Bat" ad campaign). But I'm sorry, I don't think THIS version of Batman is the one we should be rooting for or wanting to be like.
Just my opinion!
In case Dobson has forgotten: Batman isn't real.
He's a bloody comic book character.
He isn't some social issue or problematic part of life that warrants this spergy and retarded comic.
I can understand being passionate about things, but making a comic about how much you hate something is pretty petty.
Gensdupays
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Jun, 2013
I guarantee you that if people disliked "modern" Batman and wanted the "old" Batman back, Dobson would be defending "modern" Batman to death.
Holy fuck Batman's teeth. Why. And honestly, how hard is it to draw a fucking Hitler salute? It's the stiffest, most unnatural pose you can willingly make. Dobson should be drawing it perfectly.
Holy fuck Batman's teeth. Why. And honestly, how hard is it to draw a fucking Hitler salute? It's the stiffest, most unnatural pose you can willingly make. Dobson should be drawing it perfectly.
AdJack
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Oct, 2014
To be fair, I'm thrilled that he made something else than "my fursona dressed as a once popular cartoon character" -shit or puns about food.
I wish he continues this SJW crap where he truly shines. At least it's somewhat interesting to see what dumb brainfarts he has in store for us.
I wish he continues this SJW crap where he truly shines. At least it's somewhat interesting to see what dumb brainfarts he has in store for us.
Molasses Assassin
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Mayo, 2015
Well I for one am totally convinced that Batler is evil and a threat to humanity since Dobson drew him with meth lips.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
I think you're talking about the widely panned The Dark Knight Strikes Again, which is actually a sequel of the excellent The Dark Knight Returns.
I actually can't even figure out which specific work Dobson is talking about. I'm not sure even Dobson knows.
SteelPlatedHeart
Not-So-New Guy
Miembro del personal
True & Honest Fan
🎤 VTuber Warden 🎤
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 3 de Dic, 2013
He's talking about ASBAR - All Star Batman and Robin. The comic that brought us the "goddamn Batman" line. Totally not the current or accepted Batman, but you know, fuck facts and all that.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Why is he talking about that now? It is hardly the current Batman, which has nothing to do with Frank Miller.
Or is it just that Miller is hated by SJWs partly because he's kind of a fascist and partly because he's a giant douche? The Dark Knight Returns is one of the best Batman reimaginings, but Frank Miller himself is barely more relevant than Dobson himself now.
In fact, the current Batman of the Nolan trilogy IS the "no guns no killing" Batman, and while I'm not sure what the Batman v. Superman one is, it isn't Miller's, although Batman/Superman conflicts are certainly going to be informed by past incarnations and past portrayals of such conflicts, as in The Dark Knight Returns itself.
- Registrado
- 27 de Sep, 2014
1) Frank Miller might be a bit of a loony, but he gave us The Dark Knight Returns and the Movie adaptation of "300". Currently, Frank Miller amounts more to the Comic Industry by merely existing than Dobson will ever do.Today's Dobbo Patreon update:
In case you think the final comparison is too harsh, just remember: This is the Batman that kills, uses a machine gun, drives around in a Tank running over innocent bystanders, kidnaps a 12 year old boy, forces said boy to eat rats, beats the crap out of Green Lantern, steals his Lantern Corps Ring, calls people retarded, tortures people indiscriminately, and slaps around women.
DC characters are iconic and idealized. They are characters you are suppose to want to be (For Example: the recent "Be the Bat" ad campaign). But I'm sorry, I don't think THIS version of Batman is the one we should be rooting for or wanting to be like.
Just my opinion!
2) Cheaply antagonizing a rather influential person of the very medium you're trying to have a breakthrough in might not have been the smartest move
3) Dobson is incredibly fond of painting a bullseye on his chest and then wondering why people take potshots at him, it's weird.
4) Geez, that's an incredibly inconvenient way of saying "90s Batman > today's Batman", cause that's all this shit is.
This, it looks more like a pupil trying to raise his arm to answer a question. Also, he completely botched the Hitler-'stache... which is just drawing a black fucking square. Way to go, Dobbers, way to go.
- Registrado
- 27 de Abr, 2015
ASSBAR is, intentionally or not, a completely ridiculous, over-the-top piece of shit. Taking it seriously as the "modern Batman" is either Dobson trying to troll or proof that he is, in fact, "retarded or something."
Última edición:
Celery Man
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Jul, 2015
Maybe it's a stupid question, but what does Dobson hope to accomplish with comics like that? It's endless whining that amounts to nothing.
- Registrado
- 7 de Mar, 2015
Oh, just wait until he finds out about Robo-Bats...
I was going to go into a bit about how misinformed Dobson is and how, despite the influence of TDKR and Year One on most modern day Batman incarnation, the crazier parts of Miller's Batman are ignored or, in the case of ASBAR, outright mocked, but in reading that comic again, I decided that that would imply that he's directly consumed recent Batman media. It's obvious to me, after reading the comic again, that he hasn't, and he's only making these assumptions from some combination of second-hand knowledge and outdated information. We know he hasn't played Arkham Knight, and most likely never will, but the fact that he thinks all recent incarnations of Batman in media act like ASBAR's Batman makes it clear that he is no position to criticize them because he clearly knows nothing about them.
Also, I don't know whether I should be annoyed that he flagrantly ripped off Emerald Twilight's cover for his Batman drawing, or thankful that he didn't remake it with the bear.
I was going to go into a bit about how misinformed Dobson is and how, despite the influence of TDKR and Year One on most modern day Batman incarnation, the crazier parts of Miller's Batman are ignored or, in the case of ASBAR, outright mocked, but in reading that comic again, I decided that that would imply that he's directly consumed recent Batman media. It's obvious to me, after reading the comic again, that he hasn't, and he's only making these assumptions from some combination of second-hand knowledge and outdated information. We know he hasn't played Arkham Knight, and most likely never will, but the fact that he thinks all recent incarnations of Batman in media act like ASBAR's Batman makes it clear that he is no position to criticize them because he clearly knows nothing about them.
Also, I don't know whether I should be annoyed that he flagrantly ripped off Emerald Twilight's cover for his Batman drawing, or thankful that he didn't remake it with the bear.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 11 de Nov, 2014
Why the fuck does anyone care about Dobson's opinions? Like, how is this worth a monthly subscription? Even trying to imagine it from the perspective of a 12 year old, I can't imagine how any value could be derived from Dobson's work.
Who can relate to him, either? He's complaining about the "batman of his time". Regardless of age, does any part of his opinion actually appeal to anyone?
Shitty art and narcissism aside, what is Dobson's artistic value? Do his ideas have any value to them at all?
He's not willing to ask these questions himself, so of course his patreon count is fucking dismal. He's purely unmarketable.
Also, did he ever put up that wallpaper?
Who can relate to him, either? He's complaining about the "batman of his time". Regardless of age, does any part of his opinion actually appeal to anyone?
Shitty art and narcissism aside, what is Dobson's artistic value? Do his ideas have any value to them at all?
He's not willing to ask these questions himself, so of course his patreon count is fucking dismal. He's purely unmarketable.
Also, did he ever put up that wallpaper?
- Registrado
- 10 de Mar, 2013
Maybe they buy into Dobby being a nice guy and innocent victim of trolls so are donating out of pity?
You'd have thought he'd have heard of Godwin's Law by now for one thing.
- Registrado
- 27 de Sep, 2014
Even as a fan, one's reaction should be a mere "oh... well, that's okay, I guess" and then just moving on.
This comic is not clever/funny, it's not really insightful (as people have shown, his depiction of modern Batman is completely wrong), it's just another misinformed rant about something inconsequential.
Also: Panel 2 is traced from The Dark Knight Returns, me thinks. At least we now know something new-ish:
When Dobson draws a regular Character, he adds lines in the face that are too thick/long and makes them look a shitton older than they are supposed to be. When he actually draws someone who's supposed to be old, his style makes it look like the head is made of soggy papier mâché.
I think the "AzP cast looking over unclear-lightsource-ville whith generic-filter clouds" counted as the one for june, didn't it? Dobson is making them at the end of the month, for some insipid reason involving trolls and withdrawing pledges.
- Registrado
- 9 de Feb, 2015
I couldn't give any less of a shit about Batman (always been more of a Marvel guy) and I still find this comic absolutely atrocious.Today's Dobbo Patreon update:
In case you think the final comparison is too harsh, just remember: This is the Batman that kills, uses a machine gun, drives around in a Tank running over innocent bystanders, kidnaps a 12 year old boy, forces said boy to eat rats, beats the crap out of Green Lantern, steals his Lantern Corps Ring, calls people retarded, tortures people indiscriminately, and slaps around women.
DC characters are iconic and idealized. They are characters you are suppose to want to be (For Example: the recent "Be the Bat" ad campaign). But I'm sorry, I don't think THIS version of Batman is the one we should be rooting for or wanting to be like.
Just my opinion!
It reads like fucking Red Scare propaganda. Unaccurate, hyperbolic and stupid.
- Estado