- Registrado
- 10 de Feb, 2015
Is it still a spectrum disorder when you cover the entire damn spectrum?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Homosexuality is a deviation from "norm", that significantly lowers one's reproduction chances. Is it wrong? Not. Is it normal from a biological point of view? No, it isn't. Does it require a treatment? No.
Believe it or not, I can sorta sympathize with the neurodiversity. I think people tend not to realize that you can live a perfectly fulfilling life with autism if you get the right kind of support networks going on. I realize that on our forums, we tend to see pretty much worst case scenario autistics who obsesses over batshit insane stuff and have crazy fetishes and the media tends to focus on autistics who are catatonic and stare at walls all day giggling. But there's tons of people in between who are probably less functioning compared to neurotypicals but higher functioning than the people who are catatonic and they just have personality quirks that put people off and tend to be socially inept. Take Temple Grandin - she has autism, her autistic obsession is cattle behavior, but she was able to channel that into getting a PhD and actually becoming the expert for that that helped design more humane and efficient ways to slaughter cattle. I have a friend with Asperger's - she has trouble with various life skills, like she has a social worker who tells her when to clean her apartment, she's a big Doctor Who fan and she likes writing horror fiction, and she loves cooking and baking. She's decided to go to school for baking and she's gotten a job at a cafe that helps disabled people get jobs and working experience and she loves that she can practice things she learns in school there. It's anecdotal evidence but the point is, these people are living perfectly fulfilling lives. They might not work a 9-5 job and live a "normal" life but what's normal anymore anyways?
I think the most apt explanation of autism is that it's a completely different OS - neurotypical is just Windows and autism is like a crazy Linux distro that's hard to use. But it's not impossible to do the same stuff as Windows, it just takes practice and time to figure out how to accommodate.
I'm inclined to disagree that there's a specific "autism culture." I went to college with a significant deaf population and I was pretty surprised to hear about deaf culture - deaf people have their own little ways of doing things like talking to other people in a car (remember, you have to sign), they have their own slang and there are ways to show sarcasm in sign language, and there's etiquette (if you have to walk through two deaf people talking to each other/signing, that's fine as it looks really weird if you try and go around them). I'm not sure if autistic people have really developed that depth of a culture.
I'm really not crazy about efforts to eliminate a cure for autism. Like I said, I think it's possible to live a fulfilling life with autism, but I think if people do want to cure themselves of it, they should be given the chance. There are probably deaf people who want to hear and get things like cochlear implants but there are also deaf people who feel that they can live fulfilling lives without their ability to hear, that it's part of their identity, and they're able to get by without it. I remember hearing that a lot of paralyzed people in wheelchairs hated Christopher Reeves as he was obsessed about finding "the cure" when they felt they were able to live even in a wheelchair.
Something that's bothered me about Autism Speaks and a lot of the autism awareness isn't that it's autistic people complaining about how much autism sucks but it's parents who are complaining how hard it is to raise a child with autism and how they'll never be "normal." I can see that it would be challenging but c'mon, just because they don't pick up on certain things doesn't mean they'll never do anything interesting in their lives.
If those parents put the energy they take trying to "cure" their children with crazy stuff like bleach enemeas or raving about vacinnes instead of trying to find out what autism actually entails and figuring out what's going on in their child's mind, they might realize that it's not an impossible task. As long as they don't spoil their kids with lots of toys and video games, mainstream them and go on about crazy conspiracy theories about how the school is after them and accept when their child goes on a love quest with a shitty Sonichu recolor, they'll have done pretty well.
That seems to be the heart of the problem: they don't think about anyone else but themselves. Maybe they can't. Maybe they're unable to put themselves into the shoes of the seven-year-old who doesn't speak, refuses to wear clothes and can't control his bowels (not Chris, shut up) or the parents who have to corral him 24/7.The thing that get's me about these Autist right's group is how against testing for autism in the womb they are. That's not fucking eugenics that's not forcing a couple to a lifelong commitment of raising a disabled child.
Godwin's Law, Connor. Godwin's fucking law.So... by the logic of this forum, we should just utilize eugenics and pharmaceuticals to rid people of eccentricity, physical/mental failings, or anything that society would deem unacceptable or undesirable in the name of security and prosperity. The last time that happened, six million were slaughtered to fulfill the fantasy of a mustached madman.
In Einstein's case they didn't make that up. Cambridge professors said that he might have had Aspergers because of how he acted during his childhood.Also, for fucks sake, stop bringing up shit like "Einstein was autistic, Michelangelo was autistic, Da Vinci was autistic" etc.
Autism was not diagnosed back then. We have no way to know if those people really had it.
And no. Having a great ability to focus on something and being good at math does NOT mean you're autistic.
In Einstein's case they didn't make that up. Cambridge professors said that he might have had Aspergers because of how he acted during his childhood.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2988647.stm
Simple, they want a way to deal with the rotten hand life had dealt them. It gives them hope.I still find it ridiculous to say that only autistics have this fabled 0, 1% chance of being geniuses.
You can't compare to homosexuality because homosexuality alone doesn't arrest your ability to perform competently in everyday life.