🦊 Furry Furry Fandom and Drama General

[TFT-A9]

Yeah I remember seeing a lot of shit surrounding that DontHugCacti name in the past but don't think I paid it as much mind as I should have, mostly because the suiters/suitmakers are their own fucking insane clique inside an already-insane fandom

 

[OccamsShaveClub]

I know I've seen/heard accusations of animal abuse and bestiality, but I don't really have anything to back it up.

 

[dunbrine47]

Has furs up in arms due to cringiness and white people antics.

 

[TFT-A9]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IJUhq1pZktIHas furs up in arms due to cringiness and white people antics.

Furries in general have no room to scream "CRINGE" at other furries tbh

 

[Womanhorse]

Looks like that DHC Lawsuit might be legit (archive)



Even if it's only a threat to sue, they've effectively just blown their own feet off by even posting this. Absolutely looking forward to this backfiring!

 

[TFT-A9]

Looks like that DHC Lawsuit might be legit (archive)

Ver archivo adjunto 1897161

Even if it's only a threat to sue, they've effectively just blown their own feet off by even posting this. Absolutely looking forward to this backfiring!

It's a pretty common tactic with some assholes to just play lawfare until the other party buckles under the fatigue and I'm guessing DHC chose Qutens because they figured Qutens was an easier target and would make an example

 

[Pastel]

God, this is sweet. From what I had read, Lucky had been going around doing true-blue malicious-intent rapings. These weren't no "uhhh we were drunk and didn't verbally say we wanted to fuck uhhh", these were Lucky continually fucking people who explicitly stated they were not having a good time and wanted off the ride. I just hope the victims are backing up all of their proof on genuine ink and paper. This is gonna be good shit.

 

[4 gold chains]

Never thought I'd live to see the day DHC implodes, but here we are

If this is legitimate, I 100% hope they lose the case. This is genuinely disgusting but also fucking hilarious. Imagine getting so assblasted about your abusive bs getting exposed that you have to sue random people online, hoping it'll go away. No one taught these retards about the Streisand Effect, now did they?
Ver archivo adjunto 1896732

 

[Crack Face]

Why does this guy not have a thread? Are people still trying to figure out whether or not he's actually alive or?

Maybe the pinworms caused sepsis and he thankfully fucking died, or build up immunity from eating shit for god knows how much time.

 

[Just Another Furgag Alog]

God, this is sweet. From what I had read, Lucky had been going around doing true-blue malicious-intent rapings. These weren't no "uhhh we were drunk and didn't verbally say we wanted to fuck uhhh", these were Lucky continually fucking people who explicitly stated they were not having a good time and wanted off the ride. I just hope the victims are backing up all of their proof on genuine ink and paper. This is gonna be good shit.

I didn't read any of that in the allegation document but I haven't checked the updates.

 

[santaclaus]

A Cease & Desist on the basis of libel is only credible if

1. The statements are demonstrably false and
2. If even after they have been proven to be such, the party(s) knowingly spread it

It's all about intent of malice. In this case, neither is applicable. Not only was there plenty of evidence to support the initial statements, but DHC could very well lose based on a technicality. Qutens merely collected alleged victim testimonies and organized it into a document. She wasn't the main contributor.

These allegations are not even new - they just got organized all into one place. DHC's members have been accused dating back years from what I remember.

So yeah. If this is a legit lawsuit, I hope Qutens wins. This is bullshit.

Not to play internet lawyer, but none of what you said means a goddam thing if they can start a case and bury the sued person in paper until they run out of money. It is such an easily abused tactic that it helped put a guy with thousands of lawsuits in the white house.
(what this guy said)

It's a pretty common tactic with some assholes to just play lawfare until the other party buckles under the fatigue and I'm guessing DHC chose Qutens because they figured Qutens was an easier target and would make an example

 

[Corn Flakes]

Not to play internet lawyer, but none of what you said means a goddam thing if they can start a case and bury the sued person in paper until they run out of money. It is such an easily abused tactic that it helped put a guy with thousands of lawsuits in the white house.
(what this guy said)

It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em, what with furries crowdfunding even a goddamn hamburger.

The harder they push, the more they'll make Qutens look like a martyr, and the more they Streisand themselves. This should be fun to watch.

 

[OccamsShaveClub]

It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em, what with furries crowdfunding even a goddamn hamburger.

Ver archivo adjunto 1897703

The harder they push, the more they'll make Qutens look like a martyr, and the more they Streisand themselves. This should be fun to watch.

At this point, they have to know that their reputation in the fandom is FUBAR. I wonder if that's why they locked comments on their tweet or if it was at the advice of their legal counsel (then again, I'd think their legal counsel would've advised them not to post about it publicly at all).

 

[Kronk _]

It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em, what with furries crowdfunding even a goddamn hamburger.

Ver archivo adjunto 1897703

The harder they push, the more they'll make Qutens look like a martyr, and the more they Streisand themselves. This should be fun to watch.

They will win because you bet your ass furfags will jump with their healthcare savings at the opportunity to "support the cause" then twist it into showing "COMMUNITY GOOD SEE US NO BAD"

I guess it could depend on who could afford the best lawyer that knows to either bypass most documentation bs, or know how to produce most documentation bs.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

It is such an easily abused tactic that it helped put a guy with thousands of lawsuits in the white house.

What this guy said lol v

It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em, what with furries crowdfunding even a goddamn hamburger.

And yeah - no. They're going to buckle from the pressure before this heads to court. Idk WHY they're even doing this since someone told me that business had gone UP after they primarily started using Facebook and Instagram. They're morons.

The time they could be using investing in their company business is now being wasted dragging a PR stunt into the court room.
Brilliant strategy.

TO FURTHER ADD ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN THEIR OWN LAW FIRM SAYS THE SAME THING:

So yeah. I'm pretty confident and stand by what I said. If furries feel like victims are being attacked, they'll throw everything and the kitchen sink at the issue.

 

[Kronk _]

What this guy said lol v

And yeah - no. They're going to buckle from the pressure before this heads to court. Idk WHY they're even doing this since someone told me that business had gone UP after they primarily started using Facebook and Instagram. They're morons.

The time they could be using investing in their company business is now being wasted dragging a PR stunt into the court room.
Brilliant strategy.

TO FURTHER ADD ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN THEIR OWN LAW FIRM SAYS THE SAME THING:
Ver archivo adjunto 1898145Ver archivo adjunto 1898146

So yeah. I'm pretty confident and stand by what I said. If furries feel like victims are being attacked, they'll throw everything and the kitchen sink at the issue.

Give to retarded furfags to have no emotional maturity or intelligence to try and do this lmfao

 

[Corn Flakes]

What this guy said lol v

And yeah - no. They're going to buckle from the pressure before this heads to court. Idk WHY they're even doing this since someone told me that business had gone UP after they primarily started using Facebook and Instagram. They're morons.

The time they could be using investing in their company business is now being wasted dragging a PR stunt into the court room.
Brilliant strategy.

TO FURTHER ADD ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN THEIR OWN LAW FIRM SAYS THE SAME THING:
Ver archivo adjunto 1898145Ver archivo adjunto 1898146

So yeah. I'm pretty confident and stand by what I said. If furries feel like victims are being attacked, they'll throw everything and the kitchen sink at the issue.

Qutens is going to be the big winner here. Victimhood clout and spare legal money to spend.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Qutens is going to be the big winner here. Victimhood clout and spare legal money to spend.

She said she's going to donate the remaining the charity but I'm going to hit the big fat X to Doubt. I honestly don't blame anyone who holds onto extra funds provided that they at least used it for its intended purposes. Whatever is left over is free for you to use. I'd personally hold onto the remainder in case DHC tries something again or I have an unexpected bill come up like medical or car-related.
Maybe that's just me though.

Once you say you're going to use the remaining funds for something else though and don't follow through, you're going to get shit on for it.

 

[TFT-A9]

She said she's going to donate the remaining the charity but I'm going to hit the big fat X to Doubt. I honestly don't blame anyone who holds onto extra funds provided that they at least used it for its intended purposes. Whatever is left over is free for you to use. I'd personally hold onto the remainder in case DHC tries something again or I have an unexpected bill come up like medical or car-related.
Maybe that's just me though.

Once you say you're going to use the remaining funds for something else though and don't follow through, you're going to get shit on for it.

I want to be optimistic about this but past observations tell me that even if Qutens fights that off successfully something fucking dumb is going to happen. Lawfare is messy shit and I guarantee DHC will be a sore loser.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Lawfare is messy shit and I guarantee DHC will be a sore loser.

That's why the smarter play is to hold the remainder.

What I wanna know is this:
If the company is specifically suing Qutens and loses, can BlondeFoxy or someone else sue her again as an individual or is that Double Jeopardy? I feel like it has to fall under Double Jeopardy but the legal system is genuinely fucky. I could see an argument made that technically this lawsuit is different since the previous case was about Qutens defaming a company. The follow up would accuse her of defaming an individual.

Idunno though. Someone with a law degree is gonna have to fill in the gap for me.