Unpopular opinions about electronics

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema SU 390
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
I feel we do not properly venerate the machine spirits of our modern devices and most of the 'inventions' of the modern age are lacking in mysterious blinking lights, levers, elabourite dials and brass casing which are all essential to proper functioning of any device.

There is also not nearly enough superfulous cabling and clockwork.

Case in point is my phone- it doesn't have any pistons or cogs or exposed wires. It is a most sad state of affairs.
 
It irks me that you can't buy a new 1.8 inch hard drive MP3/MP4 player anymore and that dumbphones are relegated to super niche/expensive markets(construction). Why hasn't anybody made a modern dumb phone to sell to geriatrics/luddites? The only new engineering needed are things like E-GPS and maybe the phone network. You could have a phone that could last like 2 weeks without being charged, due to not needing a power hungry screen and processor.
 
Tesla coils and van de graaf generators aswell- i've no idea what those things are but i vaguely remember them from a physics class 10years ago and can think of no good reason why macbooks shouldn't have a few attached.
 
It irks me that you can't buy a new 1.8 inch hard drive MP3/MP4 player anymore and that dumbphones are relegated to super niche/expensive markets(construction). Why hasn't anybody made a modern dumb phone to sell to geriatrics/luddites? The only new engineering needed are things like E-GPS and maybe the phone network. You could have a phone that could last like 2 weeks without being charged, due to not needing a power hungry screen and processor.

Lot's of industrial PC's use them I have a 10ft x 10ft storage locker full of stuff from when I wound up my old IT company the end of last year if I have any in stock I'll send you a PM.

As for dumb phones, look at Doro they make them for older people they are a little big to accommodate the keys but they fit the bill and Nokia still make a few and are OK not like the old Nokia 3310's but still very usable.
 
I can sperg all day about how Phablets are only there to appeal to boring wannabe fourteen year old techsters. Our market is getting worse because children at the age of 3 were blessed with an iPhone or Galaxy Tablet, therefor want OCTOCORE or FIFTY INTERNAL GIGS at a "reasonable price". Oh lord how math failed my generation.

"Phablet"... Oh, make me walk through the temple of Set, I fucking HATE that word play. It sucks that Samsung are not making anything good other than Mid-Ranged and Entry-Level phones these days, I remember when both Sammy and Motorola still produced QWERTY Droids. I hate OPPO for releasing average ten inch "Phones" with razor thin profiles, come on take a note from Motorola who produced quality 'thin phones' back when they lasted more than two years. Samsung and LG still make great basic phones, though you have to go out of your way to even get an old Nokia brick.

Point being; I like 3.5'' devices and about 4'' display devices. That's it. One handed use is only really safe with anything below 5''. Add to that, I wish the Modular Revolution started years ago with Smartphones considering some of their motherboards are barely half the size of the screen. I look forward to ARA given it might actually reintroduce western Flip Phone influence, only we won't have to order a non-functioning ten grand device from Japan.

Apple can go eat a dick, so can that sellout Dre. I'm actually glad the Beat's Speakers are fire hazards, a successful person such as Dr. Dre should realize how Apple designs everything against their previous year rather than build up from it.

You could say 'phone tablet'(although I'm sure you do). It's weird that Samsung is following Apple's trend in big ass phone and can't take the battery out. I want to be able to take the battery out, not send it to a fucking store! I don't see the appeal of Beats anyway. I'm not paying $150-200 for fucking headphones. At most I'll pay $9 for earphones. I haven't purchased any of the over the ears headphones that are at $20-$50. I like Sony and JVC more than any other brand. Aiwa is okay, haven't owned anything Aiwa in decades. It amazes me that Apple uses the same technology as Microsoft but charges arm and leg prices for their desktops and laptops. Ridiculous.
 
There are advantages to expensive headphones (I'm wearing $300 Sennheiser HD600s as I write this), but the problem with Beats is that they sound like ass compared to other things in that price range. You can actually get pretty good headphones for about $60 if you're careful enough. It's sort of a game on forums like head-fi to look for unusually good sounding headphones for low prices.

I heard that pricey ones have better quality and 'last longer'. I only use head/earphones to listen to music and watch YT videos whenever I'm in a public place or at home with the AC blasting in the background. I can see why expensive headphones are a lot better, but I only use them often. I just see no reason to spend $60 to $300 for something I only use every now and then.
 
The ear pads still need to be replaced on expensive headphones, and you can't necessarily count on those being available forever. They're frequently made of polyurethane foam; it eventually decomposes whether you're wearing them or not. So if you're not picky and only use them occasionally, cheaper ones are probably fine. But more expensive headphones are often a lot more comfortable, less prone to creaks and other annoyances, and just generally more pleasant to use.

I see. I haven't owned the ones with polyurethane foam yet. I've only had ones with the cotton like covers on them(the ones from the 90s in laymen's terms). I'll see which ones I want. I haven't been payed yet and I don't mind waiting for new headphones. I'm just a little bummed not having to listen to the podcasts I downloaded recently and blasting my laptop to full volume because of my AC. [sigh]
 
It irks me that you can't buy a new 1.8 inch hard drive MP3/MP4 player anymore and that dumbphones are relegated to super niche/expensive markets(construction). Why hasn't anybody made a modern dumb phone to sell to geriatrics/luddites? The only new engineering needed are things like E-GPS and maybe the phone network. You could have a phone that could last like 2 weeks without being charged, due to not needing a power hungry screen and processor.
My 2008 iPod classic died six months ago, and I'm still mourning its death. There isn't anything else like it. Now I play music in my car with my phone, but the lack of physical buttons is going to get me killed in a crash. If I want to do something as simple as skipping a track I have to pick it up, unlock and look at the screen to make sure I press the exact specific spot.
 
I've noticed a lot of people here sharing similar feelings about Apple, but here's my perspective.

I really didn't have an opinion on them until I began working for AT&T.

For better part of 3 years I worked in a call center for AT&T, all but about 6 months as a manager. When I started in 2011 I was informed of Apple's relationship with AT&T. Until 2012 the Iphone was exclusively sold and used via AT&T, this brought AT&T a lot of customers but it came at a price. Unlike every other phone manufacturer ever, Apple dictated strict pricing guidelines and rules on how Iphone customers could be dealt with. Apple didn't like the idea of upgrades, offering discounted equipment for a 2 year contract. We could NEVER discount an Iphone below standard upgrade price, we could almost never waive an early termination fee (ETF) when a customer cancelled service, since that fee is what allowed that phone discount, and finally we could almost never offer early upgrades to/from an Iphone. People have been fired for waiving termination fees on Iphones, or promising to do so, in situations when doing so with any other device would have not been a big deal. That contract had to be strictly adhered to, even if AT&T wanted to do something special for a tenured customer who may have had a bad experience.

In the early years of AT&T's relationship with Apple it was even worse. Agents weren't even allowed to give courtesy credits or promotion plans to Iphone customers, since the bill is one way the loss on discounted equipment is covered, and discounting the bill sort of defeats the purpose of contract upgrades. People have been fired for offering courtesy credits for legitimate reasons, like a terrible store experience or defective equipment, just because the customer had an Iphone.

After 2012 things relaxed significantly, but it is still not totally even. AT&T reps still cannot offer discounts on Iphones and a few other limitations. Sometimes they work around this limitation by offering a credit on the bill to reimburse for paying full price on a phone they wish they could discount for the customer.

If Apple offered a superior product, then this would be understandable, but they offer a sub-par product as if it were premium.

The Iphone 4 had the worst cell reception of any phone offered in my time working for AT&T, with the possible exception of 2010/2011 Blackberry devices. It became a joke in the call center. Whenever a customer would call in complaining about call quality, if there were multiple lines on the account, we could be sure almost every time the Iphone line either had the worst reception or was the only line with issues. To be fair, this got significantly better since then. I still wouldn't bet on an Iphone getting better reception than any Samsung.

From a consumer perspective, I think smartphones are a waste of money in general, so I don't have one. But if I were to get one I would stay away from the Iphone for several reasons:
-No customizability compared to the options offered by Android.
-Apps selection is limited and almost never free. Android offers a wide variety of apps and they are almost always free. I don't need Apple telling me what products are good/safe. I'm a smart consumer who does my homework before I install anything.
-No/limited interface with Windows computers. Vast majority of Americans use Windows, why would I want to limit myself to exclusively Apple products?
-They make sure their products are not compatible with third party options, often not even backwards compatible. If you buy a new device, you buy new accessories. Charging ports for example.

Apple sucks.

They are arrogant and overrated. I know very few people that I worked with in the callcenter who used Apple. Many converted away because of what they saw, and took pride in converting others to anything but Iphones.
 
Última edición:
Why the fuck don't the make chargers with AWG lower than 24? Why the fuck do they have to make shit impossible to fix?
 
My biggest bitch about smartphones is they aren't totally liquid-proof. Yeah, I know you can buy an Otter case or whatever, but for my job even that isn't much help. I spend a good portion of the work day wet and covered in blood, fat & animal grease and that isn't very electronics-friendly.

I also agree with MACH-IV, the lack of buttons on modern electronics is annoying as fuck. If I get a call at work, I have to stop what I'm doing, quickly remove three sets of gloves, fish out my phone from whatever pocket/pouch I've got it in-because there is no belt clip that will keep one safe and dry in my line of work- then try to swipe the screen with wet hands. I've actually seen my co-workers just yank out their phone & swipe the screen with their nose. It works most of the time.

I currently carry an el-cheapo button flip-phone in the hood of my Hoodie I wear under my butcher's coat. It's the only thing I've found that works.
 
I also mourn the loss of a real iPod.

--

At my work, we have iMacs...that run Windows. The library has done this for years and it makes NO sense.

That not only doesn't make sense, it makes whatever the opposite of sense is. That's about the worst possible thing you could do, overpaying for underperforming hardware to run an OS it isn't intended do, and foregoing the one genuinely good thing about Apple computers, or at least the one thing that comes close to justifying their excessive prices.
 
I feel like the race to making a private online device is a lost cause. I see a variant of a 'black phone' smart device being nothing more than a six hundred dollar nerdwank that'll be exploited in a week if not a day. Yes, backdoors are scoped out in even seconds. Biggest scam of the phone market to date.
 
That not only doesn't make sense, it makes whatever the opposite of sense is.

And there is no option for the patrons to choose to use OSX or Windows 7 when they're using the computer. The library staff only uses 2 programs, they can't find a Mac version? Our IT person was recently hired, and she's just some air force dropout that just knows how to install software and turn the router on and off. wow

/edit/
just looked up to see if the company that makes the library software makes OSX software. 'Guess not.
 
I use Lumia in High Contrast Mode *regularly*, without having the sensory difficulties to make it necessary in the first place.

It looks cool. Bite me.
 
Slightly off topic but: Facebook should be banned for the same reason that Heroin is banned. 98% of people who use heroin don't have the sense of self control to stop themselves being consumed and neither do Facebook users.
 
I don't know if this constitutes as an unpopular opinion, but people working in general tech retail (Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Carrier Retail) need to keep their opinions about *insert brand* to themselves unless a customer asked. That is if the customer openly gives a shit about a medial employees point of view, it hurts companies and its brands to either glorify or slander their product in supporting retailers AND online sellers.

@LazarusOwenhart you'd be amazed (maybe, maybe not) what social things you can do online even without a Facebook.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo