💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Goddamnit, first he had to manually delete and rewrite a tweet, now he got the flamethrowerguy spoilered.
Can't he ever catch a break, geez.
also note the irony of Dobson now having spoiled others of the flamethrower-guitar guy.
 
God damn it Dobsy, stop doing my job for me.

Also, anyone want to fill me in as to why the guy hates PCs when Macs are not that much better when it comes doing art?

If you are in a game/animation/software dev office, the guys doing the hard work are usually not the ones with the Macs... The guys with the Macs are either producers who want to look hip and artsy, or their skillset is straight out of the early 90's (and yes, these dinosaurs still exist and get work in less glamourous places). It's to the point where you can walk into a place and generally know exactly who knows their shit and who is insecure and based as fuck just on their rig, without ever seeing a single piece of art.

The whole, "Macs are for the iconoclastic, artsy game changers!" has always been just a marketing ploy so that idiots would spent 3x as much. Most artists just want the raw horsepower so that they don't have to wait forever for saves/renders/etc. Especially in 3D, where even very high end PCs can be come doorstops within two years depending on what you are doing.

Dobson could absolutely get a job as he is now, but he would have to set his expectations low or work in a lowbrow area that a lot of great guys would never touch.
 
If you are in a game/animation/software dev office, the guys doing the hard work are usually not the ones with the Macs... The guys with the Macs are either producers who want to look hip and artsy, or their skillset is straight out of the early 90's (and yes, these dinosaurs still exist and get work in less glamourous places). It's to the point where you can walk into a place and generally know exactly who knows their shit and who is insecure and based as fuck just on their rig, without ever seeing a single piece of art.

The whole, "Macs are for the iconoclastic, artsy game changers!" has always been just a marketing ploy so that idiots would spent 3x as much. Most artists just want the raw horsepower so that they don't have to wait forever for saves/renders/etc. Especially in 3D, where even very high end PCs can be come doorstops within two years depending on what you are doing.

Dobson could absolutely get a job as he is now, but he would have to set his expectations low or work in a lowbrow area that a lot of great guys would never touch.
Macs were pretty much the industry standard in desktop publishing 20 years ago, I think. Dobson's mindset hasn't really left the 90's. Nowadays, Macs are just overpriced snob computers, in my opinion.

I think that maybe Dobson could get a job in something like this: http://toypromotion.com/
 
He'll never touch a PC. A-Dob's too proud to go back on his Mac Vs. PC comic.
Think it's more just that he's one of the original Nintenyearold manchildren.

He's never been interested in Video Games, he's always been interested in Nintendo Games.

He only went on about Arkham Knight because he spends all day on Twitter and Twitter was talking about it.
 
Última edición:
I've heard Macs are good for artists. Are there just more art programs available for Macs?
God damn it Dobsy, stop doing my job for me.

Also, anyone want to fill me in as to why the guy hates PCs when Macs are not that much better when it comes doing art?
I've seen a Steve Jobs documentary about this, it's called Triumph of the Nerds. Adobe used to work exclusively with Apple to create their products. If you wanted to do digital art in the mid-80s, Mac was the only way to do it. Nowadays, it really doesn't matter anymore.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]615424938816720896[/MEDIA]Goddamnit, first he had to manually delete and rewrite a tweet, now he got the flamethrowerguy spoilered.
Can't he ever catch a break, geez.
also note the irony of Dobson now having spoiled others of the flamethrower-guitar guy.

Can wait for his head to explode from cognitive dissonance once he gets torn between Banana Wu gushing over Mad Max and Sarkeesian bitching about how it isn't feministic enough.
 
I think he'll ultimately be on Wu's side. It's the only one he ever seems to bring up, unless I'm wrong.
 
If you are in a game/animation/software dev office, the guys doing the hard work are usually not the ones with the Macs... The guys with the Macs are either producers who want to look hip and artsy, or their skillset is straight out of the early 90's (and yes, these dinosaurs still exist and get work in less glamourous places). It's to the point where you can walk into a place and generally know exactly who knows their shit and who is insecure and based as fuck just on their rig, without ever seeing a single piece of art.
Well, I don't have a Mac, so I feel okay about myself. Though my computer's woefully underpowered as fuck. Don't even have a graphics card either.
 
Interesting thing about this was back when his Something Awful thread was still open, people actually agreed with it because of their dislike of Santorum.
Yeah, I don't see how it's anti-Southern. That's as accurate a portrait of Santorum (who's from Pennsylvania) as Dob's capable of.

Now, it's hacky and ridiculously hyperbolic, but that's our Dob!
 
Well, I don't have a Mac, so I feel okay about myself. Though my computer's woefully underpowered as fuck. Don't even have a graphics card either.

It's all good! I am just speaking from experience... There's exceptions to everything. It's never about the tools or software, always just about the skill level of the artist.
 
It's all good! I am just speaking from experience... There's exceptions to everything. It's never about the tools or software, always just about the skill level of the artist.
And that's where I feel the most uncomfortable. However, unlike our old pal Dobbo. I actually know a thing or two (even if I'm not that great about it). I know things like anatomy, color, making faces not look ugly as sin... I don't think I need to elaborate further.
 
Dobson's Patreon was up to 110 dollars, now it's back on 105 dollars and 42 patreons. Can't be bothered to make a screencap.

Looks like the "I don't really want to pay"-exodus has started.

It is really telling and pathetic. Those numbers reveal the true nature of the audience that he manage to garner when he was on DeviantArt; majorly penniless preteens that don't know any better and it is not surprising than that is the kind of people he attracted with his "Talk out of my ass beliefs and I'm beyond critique, block anyone who doesn't agree!"

Just look at the numbers, Patreon works for many creators the same way "free-to-play" works in the mobile space (I know it is a strange comparison but bear with me). Just as in F2P platforms the people who developed the app count that at the very least 1% of the entire userbase of people that downloaded it will pay for content, so say an app gets 1 million downloads, of which 1% (10,000 costumers) will pay for in-game purchases, making the app successful and profitable for the developer. I too have noticed that this similarly works for artist with big audiences, an artist with say 20,000 followers as an example will get around 200 patrons that are willing to give money to said artist, it is not an absolute metric but it is an educated estimate of what to expect from good artist producing good content.

Here are some statistics from Patreon itself:

  • $1 pledges account for 33% of all pledges (and 5.2% of earnings)
  • $5 pledges account for 22% of all pledges
  • $10 pledges account for 10% of all pledges (33% of earnings from $5 and $10 combined)
  • $10 pledges and below account for 90% of all pledges (50% of earnings)
  • $50+ pledges account for 2% of all pledges (26% of earnings)
  • $100+ pledges account for 0.65% of all pledges (15% of earnings)
Now look a Dobson's numbers: he managed to attain 56,000+ followers on DeviantArt, that is HUGE for any artist, so at the very least 1% (560 Patrons) should be willing to donate each month. Lets see how would this theoretically translate IF Dobson were actually a good artist with a honest, discerning and well-off audience with disposable income:

560 Patrons
  • $1 pledges account for 33% of all pledges ( 188 patrons * $1 = $188 )
  • $5 pledges account for 22% of all pledges ( 122 patrons * $5 = $615 )
  • $10 pledges account for 10% of all pledges ( 56 patrons * $10 = $560 )
  • $10 pledges and below account for 90% of all pledges (50% of earnings) (This is 32.35% of patrons donating between $1-$10 = Avg $5.5 179 patrons * $5.50 = $984.50)
  • $50+ pledges account for 2% of all pledges ( 11 patrons * $50 = $550 )
  • $100+ pledges account for 0.65% of all pledges ( 4 patrons * $100 = $400 )
So any artist with that big of an audience should be pulling around approximately $3293 ( and I know this is a very rough estimate since there is a margin of error but I made the same estimate using the Yandere Dev Patreon https://www.patreon.com/YandereDev?ty=h and it came off just $134 off mark of the real amount but results may vary, anyone out there with a working knowledge of statistics and math can correct me anytime. )

Now lets look at Dobson's reality, of 56,145 DA followers only he managed to convert that into 42 paying patrons, that's a conversion rate of aprox. 0.075% ... That's right, the guy cannot even manage 1/10th of 1%. If this isn't the biggest reality check anyone can have as to establish how much of a failure Dobson is, nothing else is.

TL;DR Version: Anyone with Dobson's number of followers should manage a respectable Patreon but "The Dobson Way" has managed him only utter failure.
 
Última edición:
I'm leaving it to any number of Weens to try out whether his Twitter password is "korrasami", "lesbians69rule", "iluvgirlongirl" or something similar. :ween:
 
Well Dobson, you are pretty abusive to your fans. If not that, you are putting people on full blast for having a reasonable criticism about you.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo