Would You Support Mandatory Circumcision For All Males?
- Iniciador del tema The Fool
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Hellbound Hellhound
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Abr, 2018
I'm going to put forward the very controversial view that I'm inclined to disagree with the idea.
- Registrado
- 3 de Mayo, 2019
Muh PTSD, muh joos, muh "just wash your penis, bucko".
- Registrado
- 18 de Dic, 2019
No but all OPs should have their penises removed.
- Registrado
- 2 de Ene, 2016
You leave me and my three penises alone. You'll be the first to be purged when we take over.
- Registrado
- 7 de Sep, 2019
GEE BILL
- Registrado
- 11 de Abr, 2019
Sure, why not, women seem to really prefer it, so why not have better dicks for all?
From a study in Canada in 2015, where most of the women had pretty equal exposure to both types of dudes and they were basically 50/50 in what their relationships currently were. Mean age was like 26 or something. Having damn near twice a desirability as uncut/no preference combined is pretty hard to argue.
ProTip (or no tip, I guess): You can piss off a lot of people with this image.
ProTip (or no tip, I guess): You can piss off a lot of people with this image.
- Registrado
- 23 de Ene, 2020
No ban it entirely.
- Registrado
- 14 de Jun, 2020
yeah yeah we all know you get off on the idea of lopping off foreskins, now let us talk about labiaplasties in peace.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
I can't find that study. Link it?
Edit: nevermind, I think I found it:
A study of less than 200 people.
It also asked them to compare the two, leading a whole host of cultural influence to the study.
There was a large study in Denmark that showed the opposite. Sex without condom with intact men was rated about 15% higher on enjoyment.
Who would have thought that having a bodypart evolved to prevent female lubrication from being scooped out would affect female enjoyment?
Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark - PubMed
Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 11 de Abr, 2019
I can't find that study. Link it?
There was a large study in Denmark that showed the opposite. Sex without condom with intact men was rated about 15% higher on enjoyment.
Who would have thought that having a bodypart evolved to prevent female lubrication from being scooped out would affect female enjoyment?
Ver archivo adjunto 1816764
Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark - PubMed
Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male...
I've read that one and it was criticized by more than a few places because of the low return rate of the surveys and the author was very anti-circumcision. The Canadian one wasn't really biased in any way by the authors (I think they were all women, actually), had a high return rate, and the women involved had pretty equal exposure to both types of dudes, and in terms of what type of man they were currently in a relationship with, it was about 55/45 in favor of cut, and they overwhelmingly prefered circumcised men, so take it for what you will. I mean, even in the "total preference" thing, less women preferred uncut dudes than women who had only been with them -- like half of them had no preference.
I meant to post this as a joke, not get into a debate, but I see that posting that did indeed make at least one person mad.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
- Registrado
- 11 de Abr, 2019
Well, you're much less likely to find female extremists when it comes to this topic. It usually turns into a retarded slapfight between men, kinda like right now. It's obviously a joke topic, I posted an obvious joke response, and now we're here.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
I agree. For the same reason men are more equipped to discuss abortion than women.
- Registrado
- 11 de Abr, 2019
Sure. I like how at the bottom of the image you posted that "more thorough investigation where it's more common is warranted" is stated, and in the Canadian study where's it's more common, but still less than half, contradicts it. And I'm pretty sure that Danish one was 2012, the Canadian one was 2015, so it was even done afterwards. Clearly women prefer cut dudes, so we should obviously make circumcision mandatory.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
Yes, the study of 5500 people needed just 180 more canadians to throw out the old result, lol.
You know, what let's do it. But let's not half arse it. Let's circumcise everyone. Let's recircumcise those that already have been. We can make everyone even cleaner.