❄️ Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema HG 400
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
Destacado
I've seen bits of her edited videos over the years but mostly just tracked her Twitter and this thread for some time now to see what the mentally ill are up to. I'm listening to the 3 hour stream posted above and just can not do it. She mentioned a specific Discord server she is in of her teenage LGBT fans, apart from her normal ones. I'm not going to pretend like the same on a chapo site wouldn't be funny, but her laughing about The Donald clone pinning the suicide hotline is a nice touch. Classy.

This woman is actually a retarded person. This is unbelievable, I don't believe she has any real thoughts of her own.
 
Última edición:
Hotel in Minsk dijo:
I don't believe she has any real thoughts of her own.
Presiona para expandir...
back in the ancient history of 2016 when i returnd to Twitter after a long period of break... within an hour I managed to get into a ight with Shoe and Shitrat for a reason that's yet to be clear to me.
Shoe is a talking out of warranty very used real doll and nothing more
 
Petronella dijo:
I love it when these chicks who think it's uwu quirky to go on about being huge slobs who can't keep a houseplant alive suddenly want to turn around and claim they want to be a tradwife SAHM
Presiona para expandir...
Also love when women who have spent their 20s pretending to be so enlightened (so different, so totally into the class of male losers they attract) finally admit that they actually want a fit, attractive man who seems like he has his act together and is capable of killing them a buffalo or whatever.

Double lol at the implication that all such men are Republicans. Way to absolutely burn her whole fan base in a single horny-tweet.
 
Karen™ dijo:
Also love when women who have spent their 20s pretending to be so enlightened (so different, so totally into the class of male losers they attract) finally admit that they actually want a fit, attractive man who seems like he has his act together and is capable of killing them a buffalo or whatever.

Double lol at the implication that all such men are Republicans. Way to absolutely burn her whole fan base in a single horny-tweet.
Presiona para expandir...
Yeah I don't think that tweet is inflammatory to the people she is trying to grift from, they are high on copium thinking that being a man (as opposed to a manchild) is tawxic masculinity.
 
Hotel in Minsk dijo:
I'm not going to pretend like the same on a chapo site wouldn't be funny, but her laughing about The Donald clone pinning the suicide hotline is a nice touch. Classy.
Presiona para expandir...
Yeah, that's one of the biggest issues with modern politics to me, hypocrisy. Both are funny, but retards like Shoe and co. act like it's awful when one site pins the suicide hotline, but hilarious when another does it.

Same with Trump supporters melting down about Trump losing that laughed at Hillary supporters melting down when she lost, and by extension, Hillary supporters laughing at Trump supporters that are freaking out that he lost, but freaked out when she lost.

This extends to policies and beliefs, but I'm not going to rant further.
 
Petronella dijo:
I love it when these chicks who think it's uwu quirky to go on about being huge slobs who can't keep a houseplant alive suddenly want to turn around and claim they want to be a tradwife SAHM
Presiona para expandir...
And the odd glee they seem to get in explaining their inability to cook the simplest dish.

I get not being a gourmet chef, but bragging about not being smart enough to follow a simple recipe like it's something to be proud of confuses the shit out of me. I don't know if, "I'm too stupid to feed myself" is as quirky as they think.
 
Druveer dijo:
I get not being a gourmet chef, but bragging about not being smart enough to follow a simple recipe like it's something to be proud of confuses the shit out of me. I don't know if, "I'm too stupid to feed myself" is as quirky as they think.
Presiona para expandir...
It helps sell the "I'm a helpless little girl, I need a strong man to take care of me" ploy; which they then leverage to stab you in the back.

I may be jaded and have a bias opinion. But I have yet to see a quality woman who is incapable of the simplest kitchen work.
 
Kheapathic dijo:
It helps sell the "I'm a helpless little girl, I need a strong man to take care of me" ploy; which they then leverage to stab you in the back.

I may be jaded and have a bias opinion. But I have yet to see a quality woman who is incapable of the simplest kitchen work.
Presiona para expandir...
I think it's also a way for them to say "I'm #relatable and human, just like you!"
 
Jack Awful dijo:
Also, she thinks showing flaws and imperfections makes her seem approachable and like she could be your friend, creating a stronger parasocial relationship.
Presiona para expandir...
What the fuck are you talking about? Every single aspect of her being is hiding her imperfections and flaws. Fake tits, fake hair, shooped face caked in makeup....
 
Burd Turglar dijo:
What the fuck are you talking about? Every single aspect of her being is hiding her imperfections and flaws. Fake tits, fake hair, shooped face caked in makeup....
Presiona para expandir...
It's controlling her imperfections. Like she can show that she's bad at cooking because who cares, she's just a face on your computer for now and she can learn, but hides visual flaws like her baldness, skin imperfections, etc. because that's what you will notice in her videos.
 
Tathagata dijo:
Even the height of reddit faces of atheism sperging, which literally appropriated cultural figures into a new set of Gospel evangelists, was more worthy of respect than shoe's appeal to "science"—as if that means anything whatsoever. Hell, Nietzsche literally addressed the adoption of "science" as a modern religion as actually worse than traditional Christianity since "science" doesn't actually provide any truly 100% concrete facts by which to orient your life. Shoe does nothing with her life on a daily basis, so maybe she ought to try reading some philosophy from the past century or so that has entirely wrecked her Enlightenment-era framework's false claims that science can lead to productive truths for orienting culture and government.

That would require some desire for self-improvement, though, and we all know that's antithetical to shoe's idiocy.
Presiona para expandir...
The issue isn't Enlightenment era "Science will lead us to make more rational decisions" philosophies, the issue has been
A) The take over of "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" types who only at best like 'popular science' which is often what you see in the media and is often wrong, based on piss poor papers, sensationalized, and/or, wrongly interpreted by 'journalists'. Think "Doing x will increase (or double) your chances of cancer!" when the actual study says it will increase it from a .00001% to .00002%.
B) People in A who treat science as a religion ("BELIEVE THE SCIENCE!" even when its highly disputed).
C) The growth in popularity of post modern and nihilist philosophies, which state that nothing really matters and "your own personal truth" is what is real/the only thing that matters. Giving justification and support for A and B.
Jones McCann dijo:
You took the words out of my mouth. It's been like this since Occupy Wall Street, which was a massive success. That's also when you first saw the SJW-type schtick inside these crowds and at rallies. That being said, the social justice isn't all inorganic, just the inception. It's kind of like infecting a few people with a virus and having it spread, ideas can kind of be like a virus too. The left is the most susceptible when it comes to this kind of psyop because of their trait-openness. It also has the benefit of the cluster-b types latching onto this sort of ideology and using it to satisfy their ego and emotional needs. The fact that this ideology has been so prevalent and spread through corporate America could also be a naural progression or another extension of the original psyop; it's a pretty big stick to beat people with and you're more likely to get blind obedience from the narcs who feed off the attention of being a lgbtqpoc, but also people are afraid to speak out against it which tends to erode social trust within the lower echelons of the organization.

edit: and there's a lot to say about how advertising has latched onto this movement as well, is it a natural progression or is it merely a means of reinforcing the behaviour? It's hard to say but the ones most succeptible to advertising in the first place will be the same ones most succeptible to the psyop.
Presiona para expandir...
My first real encounter with what would become modern Social Justice was in 2009 when I was chaperoning a high school age group national gathering for my former church's national affiliate. It was all about Social Justice (and not the 'feed the poor, befriend the outcasts like Jesus did' type social justice).
I was horrified at what I saw, but was not surprised when Social Justice started to take over in OWS, as it was already infecting other wise areas that were more conservative.
 
stupidpieceofshit dijo:
The issue isn't Enlightenment era "Science will lead us to make more rational decisions" philosophies, the issue has been
A) The take over of "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" types who only at best like 'popular science' which is often what you see in the media and is often wrong, based on piss poor papers, sensationalized, and/or, wrongly interpreted by 'journalists'. Think "Doing x will increase (or double) your chances of cancer!" when the actual study says it will increase it from a .00001% to .00002%.
B) People in A who treat science as a religion ("BELIEVE THE SCIENCE!" even when its highly disputed).
Presiona para expandir...
'The Science' in this sense is more of a media construct, where you can package something as 'The Science' and then sell it to the masses. It's similar to how religious and political organisations promote dogmas or slogans in a pre-packaged form that can then be regurgitated by the populace. People are often influenced more by the media, emotional manipulation, and advertising, than the somewhat dry and often ambiguous findings of scientific practice. The 'I LOVE SCIENCE' types are also slightly quizzical in their conviction that the fundamental topic at issue in political discourse is whether people love 'SCIENCE,' rather than people typically not being enthusiastic about looking into 'science' beyond what is preached to them by establishment and mainstream sources such as the media and government.

Of course, the leftist hatred of 'mansplaining' and things that are 'offensive' means that, no matter how much they 'LOVE SCIENCE,' they are only open to considering a very limited spectrum of science that does not risk offending their sensibilities.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo