😵‍💫 Skitzocow Stephen William Lafleur / henstepl / Thisismyrofl / Elecbullet - Schizophrenic Arsonist Who Hates Soda

Destacado
schizophrenic person posting, be nice and take your olanzapine or whatever they are giving you. Because you are hurting yourself and others. I understand that you write about some syndrome you discovered, but if you have nothing wrong, the olanzapine will leave you as you are.

If you don't want to, don't drink fizzy drinks, but if you burn hospitals you will be tied up and you will be given an injection of an antipsychotic whether you want it or not and it's much, much better if you take it on your own and then eventually you can be weaned out of it.

The internet is not a nice place, get advice from people who studied and took an exam, it's for your own safety.
 
JY's Tampon dijo:
Are there any additional threads you follow here?
Presiona para expandir...

Not really. I know you discuss autism and schizophrenia a lot, but when you're not laughing at them, there's an air of mystery to these diseases that's simply dispelled if my theses are true.

Schizophrenic bad behavior, when it is not directly resulting from psychosis, is because you can't stand adrenaline AND choline at the same time or serotonin AND dopamine at the same time.

And the subdivisions of autism are Type A-like (adrenaline/dopamine), lowerface affect and no clumsiness, Type B-like (choline/serotonin), upperface affect with adeptness malvolition, and Type O, which is not Asperger syndrome but true autism: neither adrenaline nor choline.

If either of these are true then they're beautiful revolutions in the understandings of these conditions. If I'm going to be maligned for what I did, then I suppose: they had better not be true.
 
Elwood P. Dowd dijo:
Pffft. People in the states that matter call it Soda. Only flyover state people a/ka/ the irrelevant call it Pop.

And I will never understand Southerners calling everything "Coke." Makes no sense.

Ver archivo adjunto 1796076
Presiona para expandir...

I can't believe someone made a map for that. It's probably about right, too. Only the east coast and southern west coast 'murricans would be ignorant enough to call their pop an incomplete chemical compound.

Have no idea what that 'Coke' deal is with the 3rd world states south of the Mason-Dixon line is all about, unless maybe all they drink is the far superior Mexican Coca-Cola made with cane sugar. Hell they even export that shit and people here pay over $3 for a 330ml bottle of it!

Pepsi Throwback which Pepsico make and sell a few months of the year is just as fucking awesome, I can tell ya. Like Mexi-Coke it's made with cane and beet sugar instead of godawful high-fructose corn syrup. The flavor is night and day. If you were born in the 70s or 80s at the latest, it tastes like childhood.

Also, @R00T sez:
ask yourself: soda grimace vs. pop grimace? which one is better

I expect an apology for your insolence pop faggot.
Presiona para expandir...

Okay, got me there. Soda grimace does sound better then pop grimace, which sounds like the name of a dance club in Japan. I still suspect you of negroidal tendancies though. ;)



*final edit* holy shit, Fuckin' Wikipedia even has an entry on the exported 'Mexican Coke' thing!
 
Última edición:
nya001 dijo:
schizophrenic person, you don't know what "affect" is, you don't make sense, call an ambulance please, there is no such thing as lower face and upper face affect -


Presiona para expandir...

If you won't allow "affect", you must give me a word I can pair with "upperface" and "lowerface" in its stead.

Or are you willing to promise that nobody is particularly expressive in the top, or the bottom of the face? Or that if such a subdivision were made, that there would be no correlation with any behavior? Such as, "the upperface affect does not avoid eye contact". Is it false?

Glutamate hypofunction makes the implicit rules of the brain explicit, and if "reduced affect display" exactly means "the inability to move the top half and bottom half at the same time", then upperface and lowerface are the tools of understanding schizophrenia. That's a big deal. It's the rules of the brain: mystery made into non-mystery.
 
I will say that it's a novel thing he has done, cause most schizophrenics don't know they are that way which makes them very difficult to reason with.
This guy knows he's a schitzo, he just used a very schitzo way of proving it. It's like writing your own 1000 page Wikipedia entry for an Anime you invented to prove you have autism.
 
henstepl dijo:
If you won't allow "affect", you must give me a word I can pair with "upperface" and "lowerface" in its stead.

Or are you willing to promise that nobody is particularly expressive in the top, or the bottom of the face? Or that if such a subdivision were made, that there would be no correlation with any behavior? Such as, "the upperface affect does not avoid eye contact". Is it false?

Glutamate hypofunction makes the implicit rules of the brain explicit, and if "reduced affect display" exactly means "the inability to move the top half and bottom half at the same time", then upperface and lowerface are the tools of understanding schizophrenia. That's a big deal. It's the rules of the brain: mystery made into non-mystery.
Presiona para expandir...
Can you go into more detail by what you mean when you say that some people are more expressive in the lower half or upper half of their faces? Like, when they're smiling they'll only use one half and the other stays perfectly still, or just that one part is more used than the other? Is it a voluntary thing, like they just prefer to use one half over the other and they could use the other half if they wanted, or is it totally involuntary, and they couldn't make expressions with the other half of their face even if they wanted to?
 
henstepl dijo:
If you won't allow "affect", you must give me a word I can pair with "upperface" and "lowerface" in its stead.

Or are you willing to promise that nobody is particularly expressive in the top, or the bottom of the face? Or that if such a subdivision were made, that there would be no correlation with any behavior? Such as, "the upperface affect does not avoid eye contact". Is it false?

Glutamate hypofunction makes the implicit rules of the brain explicit, and if "reduced affect display" exactly means "the inability to move the top half and bottom half at the same time", then upperface and lowerface are the tools of understanding schizophrenia. That's a big deal. It's the rules of the brain: mystery made into non-mystery.
Presiona para expandir...
This fucking rules, he's using this very serious and pseudo-academic language to say "I proved I'm insane cause I drank Pepsi like a retard."
 
ShinyStar dijo:
Also, did you have pets as a child? Given that the soft comfort of teddies is distressing to you, how do you feel about small animals?
Presiona para expandir...
I bet if you checked the yard of his childhood home, where he probably still lives, there would be a bunch of small graves with tiny skeletons in them.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo