💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Yuck, I had to sign up for Patreon and pledge 1 dollar to this hack to see it. Might as well take one for the team and cancel it before it charges my card.

I'll make caps of it right now.

Here it is.

https://archive.is/WAI9G

12914119334802766447.jpg

He linked to this too.

http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~amitp/game-programming/polygon-map-generation/demo.html
Thanks for the effort! That is more than I can say to Dobson. He's literally copypasting random stuff to get maps. Now, this isn't a bad idea in itself, but it seems a bit like a crutch.
 
I've suspected that he's been lurking here for a while.

Me too. His "People are making up stories about me, it's psychotic!" rant coincided with us speculating about his secret job. Just compare what we said and what he then said. Is he not answering us there?

In which case, hi Dobby. You know we laugh at you anyway no matter how you communicate with us.
 
Thanks for the effort! That is more than I can say to Dobson. He's literally copypasting random stuff to get maps. Now, this isn't a bad idea in itself, but it seems a bit like a crutch.

If that's his best attempt he might as well generate a random Minecraft map. Hell, I've played on Minecraft maps that looked better and made more sense than this thing.
 
I've suspected that he's been lurking here for a while. He obviously won't mention this place by name but probably has read enough to the point where he knows about @Ass Manager 3000 and that's why he hasn't been responding to him directly.
For that he would have to overcome all the comments that triggers him. You are giving him too much credit.
 
Didn't you get the memo? According to SJW-3rd Wave Feminist logic there is no such thing as an attractive adult woman that dresses sexily and is comfortable flaunting her body of her own free will, no, sexy dresses and women that wear these are slaves brainwashed by the "Patriarchy".

You see a beautiful, fit female body is offensive to SJWs because it is a sort of "ableism" because for a body to be fit and beautiful usually requires people to eat right and do exercises, in other words; it takes effort and discipline. Two words that are also usually absent from the Tumblr crowd mentality that tries to sell the theory of "there is beauty in bodies of all shapes and sizes, you are perfect as you are and therefore you can be as lazy as you want, we won't judge, see no effort required on your part, just for being born you are already a special snowflake" which is a perfect rethoric for Dobson to subscribe to since it fits like a glove to his "at my own pace" mantra.

It is not as if SJW are trying to fight against hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution where large breasts, ample hips and thin waist aren't biological markers of health and fitness in women to procreate healthy offspring. It is not as if in men's behavior to seek such markers isn't ingrained in the genetic code of the species, NOOOO! everything must be an artificial social construct that can be overturned with nice progressive rhetoric.

So of course Dobson would bitch and moan about attractive women having cleavage, he wants those SJW brownie points. To tell a woman to cover up when it is her choice to wear clothes with cleavage isn't in itself callous and overbearing? Cover up! as if it there is something inherently wrong, offensive or vile about the female body. Telling an adult woman to cover up has to be one of the most patronizing acts one can do. And here is Dobson telling a female character that has literally said in the comics about her costume: "shows what I am: female, healthy. If men want to degrade themselves by staring, that's their problem, I'm not going to apologize for it." Power Girl would literally tell someone like Dobson to mind their own business ... and probably recommend him to eat a salad and take a walk once in a while.
To be fair, the ideal of beauty changes over time:

t-wizamamzgy.jpg
 
Thanks for the effort! That is more than I can say to Dobson. He's literally copypasting random stuff to get maps. Now, this isn't a bad idea in itself, but it seems a bit like a crutch.

True, it's pathetic, and it's what anyone would do just messing around with the program at first. Wow, click Random a bunch of times. I'd have never figured out using procedurally generated content and just randomly shitting it all out over a screen.

What a complete idiot.

This kind of thing would probably do fine for some random RPG, but is a joke for building a world.

It's almost like he's a lazy cunt who just does the first thing any newb would do and then stops there and declares mastery.
 
True, it's pathetic, and it's what anyone would do just messing around with the program at first. Wow, click Random a bunch of times. I'd have never figured out using procedurally generated content and just randomly shitting it all out over a screen.

What a complete idiot.

This kind of thing would probably do fine for some random RPG, but is a joke for building a world.

It's almost like he's a lazy cunt who just does the first thing any newb would do and then stops there and declares mastery.
It's not only pathetic, it's disingenuous and borderline plagiarism. He didn't make those randomised maps.
 
The way he talks it's like he's got something against women with large breasts and wants them to dress modestly at all times.
These people yell about slut shaming, then turn around and say that women with big breasts are bad and shouldn't be in video games. Sure, they will just say that they only need to dress moderately, but one of their biggest examples is the original Lara croft (I think that's how you spell her) and she wears a t-shirt in the original game if I remember right. So they seem to just be offended by big boobs, covered or not. And saying "big boobs give girls unrealistic standards" is silly because some girls DO have big boobs.
what's with the hate?
 
What the hell does he have against Arkham Knight?
From what I can gleam from shitty news sites and applying what we know about Dobson, he hates it because of the portrayal of female characters.

Apparently at some point, Poison Ivy is taken hostage and Bats has to save her. Shit sites like the Huffington Post are saying this is "damsel saving" and the game does more to reinforce Batman as a patriarchal symbol to save weak women.

Which is a crock of shit.
 
Again, considering Dobson's white knighting tendencies are nothing more than an attempt for him to live out his white knight fantasies IRL, his criticism of damsels is disingenuous.
 
You raise a good point. Recently, Dobson made a comic about Raven's outfit in the New 52 comic series and there was something that went through my mind, but I didn't really know how to phrase it. The thing is, Dobson gives this clumsy explanation what (he thinks) objectification is and then goes "also, this is Raven's new outfit", insinuating that her depiction is indeed an objectification of women. Here's a question I would love to ask Dobson: What is Raven's personality like in the New 52? If anything, the one objectifying Raven is Dobson, since he's only looking at her design and not her overall presentation, personality and so on. Maybe she's a really strong protagonist that's a mighty force to deal with for her enemies, with a rich personality and interesting interaction with other characters. I wouldn't know, I don't read comics, but basing your entire opinion about that character on her attire seems oddly sexist. Not necessarily the "I fap to that" kind of sexist, but the "I reduce her to her looks" kind of sexist. SJWs seem so hung up on objectification being the reduction of a woman to her looks, yet that's only part of the problem they love to blow out of proportion while ignoring everything else (as SJW love to do). I guess anyone would concur that, for instance, reducing a woman just to her ability to give birth would be equally as shitty - reducing her to a glorified incubator. The problem isn't girls in sexy outfits, the problem is girls that are nothing but a foil for sexy outfits. Objectification is not depicting a female character in a sexy way and it never will be. The more important aspect is the reduction of a character or person to only one function/aspect. Objectification has many faces, for instance reducing a female character to a fucktoy, or cocktease without any function, purpose or personality outside of that function. I'd argue reducing a male person to his function and value for society (like reducing someone to his job) is an act of objectification as well. When you treat characters and people not like individuals with personalities, but rather some -gasp- object. That is objectification. And it can be aimed at males and females alike. That said, part of the reason why I hate the characters in AzP so much is the fact they are the definition of objetification. They are pretty much just their gender with badly drawn 'eye-candy' designs and no personality whatsoever.
Objectification is a good thing.

It allows you to see a person objectively. Without it, you couldn't appreciate or respect what that person has to offer, the uniqueness of that person's position, or the significance of that person's role in life.

It's how business works. You objectify people to figure out where they stand and where they might fit better. Stigmatizing the objectification of women denies them a working role in the economy. For many years, it truly did.

Patriarchy - men were personally responsible for all objective matters, women were personally responsible for all subjective matters. It was blasphemous to not live up to your obliged role (or to allow those lines to cross), and those who did were undesirables - bums, deadbeats, scoundrels, whores, old maids, and bitches.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo