Any thoughts? Previous leaks imply they would force SOPA style laws on us.
TPP likely to pass today.
- Iniciador del tema Takayuki Yagami
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
It really depends on how much the Senate guts the bill before they allow it to move up.
Last I check Senate Leader whuts his face wanted to strike out a pretty big chunk of it before allowing it to pass.
But American politics are pretty whacky lately so who knows whose in whose pocket, a lot of heavy hitters want this bill to pass fast for some reason.
Last I check Senate Leader whuts his face wanted to strike out a pretty big chunk of it before allowing it to pass.
But American politics are pretty whacky lately so who knows whose in whose pocket, a lot of heavy hitters want this bill to pass fast for some reason.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
- Registrado
- 11 de Dic, 2014
Because a lot of the reason SOPA and PIPA failed is because there was enough time to rally the people to voice their discontent. We can bitch all we want if it's already passed and it won't change a thing.
Edit: If you've got 2 hours to kill and like documentaries check this out. It goes into the whole SOPA/PIPA failure plus a lot more about an awesome dude not enough people know about.
- Registrado
- 21 de Abr, 2015
I knew everything being free was too good to last forever, but Goddamnit, this should not be happening.
- Registrado
- 26 de Mayo, 2013
But the president is supposed to be a socialist! If he's really just a corporatist how is he any different than the idiot he replaced seven years ago?
Don't blame me, I contacted my elected official and expressed my desire to see this thing voted down regularly for years now, of course, he's first in line to rubber stamp it because he's a real P.O.S. who thinks Afghan terrorist have a navy to bring their fight to our shores.
Don't blame me, I contacted my elected official and expressed my desire to see this thing voted down regularly for years now, of course, he's first in line to rubber stamp it because he's a real P.O.S. who thinks Afghan terrorist have a navy to bring their fight to our shores.
- Registrado
- 20 de Ago, 2014
... Say hello to a lot more treasonous activity from people living here in the US who have every right to hate their own country, knowing their best outlet is severely fucked with by cowards in power who could stand to sacrifice themselves and leave the rest of us who see through the lies and fear-mongering BS out of it, already.
- Registrado
- 21 de Abr, 2015
What'll probably happen is people'll just move to TOR to watch all their free pornography and HBO episodes. That, and the nation's IP laws, copyright laws, and working class'll get fucked in the ass while the fucking spreads out to half the planet.
This country needs an enema.
This country needs an enema.
- Registrado
- 20 de Ago, 2014
Thanks for the idea, BTW.
- Registrado
- 21 de Abr, 2015
It really would be a good way to generate money as long as whoever does it knows to be careful, not get greedy, and doesn't go putting hits on people like the Dread Pirate Roberts.
Whoever does it likely will get caught anyway, but at least they'll only serve a long snit in the joint rather than leave feet first. At the very least, their morality'll be tarnished to a significantly lower degree than the DPR.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
No way to do that. They could pass a law to that effect, but since they're the ones who pass laws, they could also pass a law authorizing them again.
- Registrado
- 31 de Ene, 2014
Agreed, and drop the secrecy. Why did the MPAA and similar industry bodies and corporations with vast vested interests in this treaty get access to it while people and their elected representatives did not? This treaty is far too broad in scope to be decided behind closed doors with the aid of the MPAA and their lobbyists. As well as driving the treaty to strongly favour industry over individual rights, it gives corporations a head-start in their lobbying of senators to support the treaty. Sure the industry participants are sworn to secrecy on the contents, but they can head to the ATM and begin stockpiling cash and brown paper bags in preparation for meeting with senators who they wish to influence. It's a massive corporate power grab that should not be secret or decided by industry groups.
- Registrado
- 16 de Jun, 2014
Doesn't matter how much we protest or bitch or moan, they're going to pass it some way or another, whether we know about it or not. Its just a matter of time until they slip it by in other stuff.
- Registrado
- 20 de Jun, 2015
Seeing how long ago that was, they probably dropped that as soon as we found out. Either that or they slashed that part out. Maybe I'm just being optimistic.
- Registrado
- 31 de Ene, 2014
That is the pattern. Obama and Co. can't possibly argue that they're doing this in the interests of the American public, as SOPA, PIPA, and ACTA attracted so much opposition. The TPP is much the same, and the reason to keep is secret is because they don't want it to blow-up like those other attempts have done. i.e. they know that these measures benefit corporate interests over people, and they are also aware that people don't want such blatant corporate welfare.
- Registrado
- 16 de Jun, 2014
Exactly, like was said above, if we don't know about it, we can't possible protest it. They know this, so from my understanding this kind of stuff is usually added as addendum to unrelated legislature.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
They don't have to do that, though. The future agreements are going to go on behind closed doors and be delivered to the Senate as a fait accompli, already done. No need for any legislative process there. Just dump it on the Senate for an up and down vote.
On the good side, treaties in the United States are not self-executing. A treaty may establish legal obligations on the part of the member nations and in international law, but it does nothing to compel the Congress to pass further legislation, and you can't be directly prosecuted under a treaty, at least in the U.S. It also doesn't trump the Constitution. I could put a bunch of legal citations here, but it isn't the time or place and I'd also have to include a lot of "but see this too" and "except when it does."
It's still scummy and underhanded and this is yet another case of the government, in this case Obama, pushing through a completely shitty deal that fucks the American public, on behalf of corporations.
Some socialist. I wish this motherfucker was half the socialist he's accused of being.
- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2013
Question time: If the government passed this law, wouldn't it backfire in their face big time? Like say, someone from senate did something stupid and he got jailed?
An Ounce of Vagina
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 3 de Feb, 2013
Implying rich people are subject to the law.I'm not exactly worried that UN stormtroopers are going to drag me off in the middle of the night now, but I do worry about this being used to silence dissent both in the US and the third world.
Edit: Just read more. Not as terrible as I thought, but lets hope it can be made a little less terrible still in the next round of court cases and treaties.
Última edición: