2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[DtoDab]

Michigan Audit shows nearly 68% error rate, intentional and systemic fraud, attempts of cleaning the machines of data.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Ver archivo adjunto 1787886

So how long due you think Biden will be President for until party decides to get raid of him and replace him with Kamala. I say 3 mouths

I say they won't get rid of him at all. They'll use him as a figurehead and shield for Kamala to hide behind.

MAYBE they'll get rid of him January 2nd 2022, so Kamala can have 2 free years (well 2 free years - 1 day), which would leave her open to being selected in 2024 and 2028. (I say being selected because there's no way we'll have actual elections by then.)

 

[murdered meat bag]

And that's why Q continues to exist. To elicit that kind of response even towards something substantially more reasonable.

With EO-13848, what happened on November 18th, the revelation that SolarWind has been compromised so badly that the shareholders and CEOs were dumping stocks as quickly as they can, and the pending report from the DNI on December 18th, I'm not paying attention to the lawsuits anymore, because something significantly more interesting is happening over here.

this seems too good to be be reasonable. i don't know what to make of it.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Once again, the Hulkster is proven right. Wisconsin lawsuit was thrown out

 

[Oats12345]

Ver archivo adjunto 1787886


I say they won't get rid of him at all. They'll use him as a figurehead and shield for Kamala to hide behind.

MAYBE they'll get rid of him January 2nd 2022, so Kamala can have 2 free years (well 2 free years - 1 day), which would leave her open to being selected in 2024 and 2028. (I say being selected because there's no way we'll have actual elections by then.)

I don't know. With the guy's declining health, especially with the presidency being a stressful job. I just found it hard to belive he will last for two years

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I don't know. With the guy's declining health, especially with the presidency being a stressful job. I just found it hard to belive he will last for two years

What stress? It's only stressful if he's actually doing the job.

He'll be in a basement 90% of the time with other people doing the work. He'll come out wave at people say hello and go back into the dungeon. Being a figurehead is surprisingly comfy.

 

[Dr J]

What stress? It's only stressful if he's actually doing the job.

Look at how much he's deteriorated between 2016 and 2020. This guy is not going to last four years, even if he's not actually fucking doing anything

Ver archivo adjunto 1787722

Ver archivo adjunto 1787723
link to their findings

Ver archivo adjunto 1787725


Rub-i-con
Rub-i-con

Is this the report that Benson and Co tried to bury?

 

[It's HK-47]

Ver archivo adjunto 1787903
Once again, the Hulkster is proven right. Wisconsin lawsuit was thrown out

"We can't throw out these ballots because the people who participated in the event believed that it was being done legally, even if the legal interpretation could be proven wrong."

That's a very unusual justification. It's perfectly fine to mislead people into a legal grey area or into a potential violation of local election laws purely because they believe it's legitimate, and you got a statistically-significant number of people to do it? I'd make the argument that significantly more voters would be "disenfranchised" --and I'm rapidly starting to hate that fucking word-- if you just allowed elections to be run so lackadaisical that even potential violations are allowed if enough people do it all at once.

Isn't this like arguing that a Ponzi scheme should be allowed to continue because way too many people believe that it's legitimate?

 

[Zero Day Defense]

this seems too good to be be reasonable. i don't know what to make of it.

The first thing is that HK-47 is only stating that he's waiting for the results of those because those seem substantial but hardly anybody is paying attention there. It may turn out to be irrelevant, or nothing may be done with it, but it has potential to elicit interesting events.

 

[Reisen Storm]

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Ver archivo adjunto 1787925

Seriously, though, I'm trying to find out which election-- if any-- had electors send to Congress competing elector lists.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

"We can't throw out these ballots because the people who participated in the event believed that it was being done legally, even if the legal interpretation could be proven wrong."

That's a very unusual justification. It's perfectly fine to mislead people into a legal grey area or into a potential violation of local election laws purely because they believe it's legitimate, and you got a statistically-significant number of people to do it? I'd make the argument that significantly more voters would be "disenfranchised" --and I'm rapidly starting to hate that fucking word-- if you just allowed elections to be run so lackadaisical that even potential violations are allowed if enough people do it all at once.

Isn't this like arguing that a Ponzi scheme should be allowed to continue because way too many people believe that it's legitimate?

It's basically "These people followed what they thought the law was, based on the fact their government told them it was okay, and it'd be unfair to disenfranchise their votes when they voted in good faith".

Plus, other counties did similar stuff and Trump's lawsuit only mentioned the two counties

 

[murdered meat bag]

Aaand Trump lost in the Wisconsin Supreme Court
Ver archivo adjunto 1787902

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

also, I love when Trumptards complain about the application of laches. Apparently the GOP couldn't challenge a form used in WI for NINE YEARS until Trump wanted to raise more money by pretending to have won.
Ver archivo adjunto 1787910

wisc case will be a bellweather since it went to oral arguments and the fraud is more about violations of state law vs schennigans.

if it denies trump because it doesnt want to toss out votes then we can expect there is no legal remedy for trump.

The majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them. The electorate expects more of us, and we are capable of providing it. Because we do not, I respectfully dissent.

Trump's remedy isn't in the courts.

 

[It's HK-47]

It's basically "These people followed what they thought the law was, based on the fact their government told them it was okay, and it'd be unfair to disenfranchise their votes when they voted in good faith".

Plus, other counties did similar stuff and Trump's lawsuit only mentioned the two counties

It's just such a weird justification for throwing the whole thing out; it's not even a legal interpretation, it's like a slightly better-worded version of "we can't do this because it might make someone sad." Yes, it would absolutely fuck some people up and yes it's not the voters' fault that they were mislead by their election officials, but that doesn't exactly make a good legal argument for violating election laws.

I mean I'd get bummed out if I was thrown in jail for robbing a bank because my mayor told me it was okay, but that wouldn't make a great defense. I know, that's extreme and ridiculous hyperbole but this ruling is just fucking weird.

 

[murdered meat bag]

It's basically "These people followed what they thought the law was, based on the fact their government told them it was okay, and it'd be unfair to disenfranchise their votes when they voted in good faith".

Plus, other counties did similar stuff and Trump's lawsuit only mentioned the two counties

that's only for 1 issue on indefinite confinement. the other stuff they ignored because of laches. the dissents make it clear that ditp and witness addresses are in violation of the law but the majority is using laches to not address this issue.

Once again, in an all too familiar pattern, four members of this court abdicate their responsibility to do so. They refuse to even consider the uniquely Wisconsin, serious legal issues presented. The issues presented in this case, unlike those in other cases around the United States, are based on Wisconsin statutory election law. Make no mistake, the majority opinion fails to even mention, let alone analyze, the pertinent Wisconsin statutes.

In Wisconsin, a defendant must prove three elements for laches to bar a claim: "(1) a party unreasonably delays in bringing a claim; (2) a second party lacks knowledge that the first party would raise that claim; and (3) the second party is prejudiced by the delay." Id., ¶12. Even if respondents carry their burden of proving all three elements of laches, "application of laches is left to the sound discretion of the court asked to apply this equitable bar." Id.

 

[Dr J]

Seriously, though, I'm trying to find out which election-- if any-- had electors send to Congress competing elector lists.

1876

Guess who the President of the Senate is?

Any truth to that rumour that Pence will resign after today? Who's the President of the Senate if Pence does resign, or recuses himself?

 

[Oats12345]

Well, I peaceful have excepted that Biden has 2on(granted by voter fraud, of course because most of the Supreme Court are cowards) .

So I have taken along break from politics.

It sucks to think Biden is going to put us back in the crapper again.

But you know on the brightside. We can put betting money on how long the dems are going to keep as president.

Also The Republicans will most likely win the house back in 2022 and I m wondering what going to happen in the local elections.

 

[Dr J]

Also The Republicans will most likely win the house back in 2022 and I m wondering what going to happen in the local elections.

The Republicans aren't going to win shit back. Biden gets away with this, that's it. There's no coming back

 

[Oats12345]

The Republicans aren't going to win shit back. Biden gets away with this, that's it. There's no coming back

I feel at some point no matter how much voter fraud. The dems will lose many people and eventually not even voter fraud will save them.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

It's just such a weird justification for throwing the whole thing out; it's not even a legal interpretation, it's like a slightly better-worded version of "we can't do this because it might make someone sad." Yes, it would absolutely fuck some people up and yes it's not the voters' fault that they were mislead by their election officials, but that doesn't exactly make a good legal argument for violating election laws.

I mean I'd get bummed out if I was thrown in jail for robbing a bank because my mayor told me it was okay, but that wouldn't make a great defense. I know, that's extreme and ridiculous hyperbole but this ruling is just fucking weird.

The courts will generally rule in favor of people's votes being counted as long as they were in good faith. If yours and 100,000 Trump votes had been thrown out because you followed, with good faith, what you thought the laws were, but it turns out that wasn't the case, how would you feel?