Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more
Men really introduced the concept of the sexual revolution back in the second wave of feminism, and ran with it because who benefits the most with unrestrained sexual exploration? Men, just like how men in dresses are trying to call themselves women so they can get into women only spaces today.
Lots of boomer cons tried to fight against degeneracy. Not everyone supported Hugh Hefner. They got got cucked by "muh constitution" and "1A." But not hate speech is the law of the land so we can censor anything we hate.
I never said a women should get married as soon as she turns 13. But I did say they should be put on a path towards marriage. That means dating protentional husbands. If we do some basic math. 1 boyfriend per year * 8 years (14-22), that's 8 years worth of solid relationship exp. Easily enough for most women to get married in their early 20s or earlier.
Doesn't exist. Feminist social construct. Women have all the power in the relationship in their 00s until mid 20s. Only late 20s when men have a solid advantage.
power dynamics exist between children and adults, not young adult women and older men. basic SMV theory. A 16 yr old women have a higher SMV than most (read non-celebrity or male model) males.
Point is you just want to fuck teen girls and have people tell you it's okay by explaining your self serving logic. It's not okay and no amount of assbackward justification will change that.
Wouldn't these precise words be typed by a grifting, internet famous MLK-citing trans woman getting her rocks off to postmodern attitudes towards abusive concern trolling
Wouldn't these precise words be typed by a grifting, internet famous MLK-citing trans woman getting her rocks off to postmodern attitudes towards abusive concern trolling
Lots of boomer cons tried to fight against degeneracy. Not everyone supported Hugh Hefner. They got got cucked by "muh constitution" and "1A." But not hate speech is the law of the land so we can censor anything we hate.
Also, Boxy, I've grown more than you. Stickers don't scare me, and my dating criteria is beyond 'can you color in the lines?' and 'can you count to 10'?
Also, Boxy, I've grown more than you. Stickers don't scare me, and my dating criteria is beyond 'can you color in the lines?' and 'can you count to 10'?
Bullshit.
Most people are struggling to find a spouse.
Society is super pozzed aka degenerate.
It was a mistake to normalize all forms of feminism.
Rather than try to address these issues, you rather attack me.
But that won't solve the real issues.
Come back when you learn to be an adult and can have a grown up conservation.
Bullshit.
I am struggling to find a spouse.
I am super pozzed aka degenerate.
I am a mistake.
Rather than try to address these issues, I attack or avoid.
But I can't solve the real issues.
I should come back when I learn to be an adult and can have a grown up conservation, and not want to fuck kids.
Boxy, you willingly rated my post, knowing what you would be agreeing to. You have officially admitted to being a fag and losing the debate. You are the epitome of retarded.
Boxy, you willingly rated my post, knowing what you would be agreeing to. You have officially admitted to being a fag and losing the debate. You are the epitome of retarded.
1. I rate you like how you rate me.
2. Here you are showing everyone that you're a real women. You're insecure and obsessed with how other people perceive you. You've talked about ratings more than me now.
3. You're all bark no bite. All your attacks are generic and ultimately you're attacking me as a self-defense mechanism from any self-reflection.
I rate you Dumb and MATI; you are. You rate me because you're dumb and mad.
2. Here you are showing everyone that you're a real women. You're insecure and obsessed with how other people perceive you. You've talked about ratings more than me now.
Sometimes I have to sit back and laugh at how much of my life disproves everything Boxy stands for. Minor TMI but there's something sweetly ironic about debating an unemployed pedo white-traitor cuck as a naturalised immigrant husband with a career-seeking wife, both of us are in secure jobs and we mutually agreed to delay children until economic factors improve.
Sometimes I have to sit back and laugh at how much of my life disproves everything Boxy stands for. Minor TMI but there's something sweetly ironic about debating an unemployed pedo white-traitor cuck as a naturalised immigrant husband with a career-seeking wife, both of us are in secure jobs and we mutually agreed to delay children until economic factors improve.
Sometimes I have to sit back and laugh at how much of my life disproves everything Boxy stands for. Minor TMI but there's something sweetly ironic about debating an unemployed pedo white-traitor cuck as a naturalised immigrant husband with a career-seeking wife, both of us are in secure jobs and we mutually agreed to delay children until economic factors improve.
You're dumb. The neo-liberal both parents work, kids get an extended childhood until age 22, model isn't suitable and it degenerates further and further each year. Your anecdotal life experience doesn't represent the population. You sound like a boomer or GenXer from the turn of the century, "just get a job and focus on improving yourself."
Sometimes I have to sit back and laugh at how much of my life disproves everything Boxy stands for. Minor TMI but there's something sweetly ironic about debating an unemployed pedo white-traitor cuck as a naturalised immigrant husband with a career-seeking wife, both of us are in secure jobs and we mutually agreed to delay children until economic factors improve.
You're dumb. The neo-liberal both parents work, kids get an extended childhood until age 22, model isn't suitable and it degenerates further and further each year. Your anecdotal life experience doesn't represent the population. You sound like a boomer or GenXer from the turn of the century, "just get a job and focus on improving yourself."
You've linked that source like over 10 times, possibly more, in support of many outlandish positions. Let me just say this: your viewpoint does not represent reality as supported by everyone who has engaged with you, even the ones who initially supported you. Your positions consistently represent a severe form of projection of your personal sad state of affairs that genuinely reeks of taking a leaf out of the SocJus playbook.
