Science An Astronomer Has Searched The Universe For a Potential Message From Its Creator - We apologize for the inconvenience.

ScienceAlert: An Astronomer Has Searched The Universe For a Potential Message From Its Creator.

An Astronomer Has Searched The Universe For a Potential Message From Its Creator​


MICHELLE STARR


2 DECEMBER 2020​


The Universe is a mysterious place. We don't know why it exists, and there are a lot of unanswered questions as to the how. But what if it was created, on purpose, by an intelligent entity? Is there some way we could find out?




In 2005, a pair of physicists proposed that if there was a Creator, they could have encoded a message in the background radiation of the Universe, left over from when light was first unleashed to flow freely through space. This light is called the cosmic microwave background (CMB).


Now, astrophysicist Michael Hippke of Sonneberg Observatory in Germany and Breakthrough Listen has gone looking for this message, translating temperature variations in the CMB into a binary bitstream.


What he recovered appears to be utterly meaningless.


Hippke's paper describing his methods and findings has been uploaded to pre-print server arXiv, (and is thus yet to be peer-reviewed); the work includes the extracted bitstream so other interested parties can study it for themselves.


The cosmic microwave background is an incredibly useful relic of the early Universe. It dates back to around 380,000 years after the Big Bang. Prior to this, the Universe was completely dark and opaque, so hot and dense that atoms couldn't form; protons and electrons were flying around in the form of ionised plasma.


As the Universe cooled and expanded, those protons and electrons could combine to form neutral hydrogen atoms in what we call the epoch of recombination. Space became clear, and light could move freely through it for the first time.




This first light is still detectable today, albeit very faintly, suffusing all known space. That's the CMB. Since the early Universe was not uniform, density variations at the epoch of recombination manifest today in very slight fluctuations in the temperature of the CMB.


Because of this ubiquity, theoretical physicists Stephen Hsu of the University of Oregon and Anthony Zee of the University of California, Santa Barbara argued - entirely theoretically - that the CMB would make the perfect billboard on which to leave a message that would be visible to all technological civilisations in the Universe.


"Our work does not support the Intelligent Design movement in any way whatsoever," they wrote in their 2006 paper, "but asks, and attempts to answer, the entirely scientific question of what the medium and message might be IF there was actually a message."


They proposed that a binary message could be encoded in the temperature variations in the CMB. This is what Hippke has attempted to find - first by addressing the claims made by Hsu and Zee, and then by using the data to try and find a message.




"[Hsu and Zee's] assumptions were, first, that some superior Being created the Universe. Second, that the Creator actually wanted to notify us that the Universe was intentionally created," Hippke wrote.


"Then, the question is: How would they send a message? The CMB is the obvious choice, because it is the largest billboard in the sky, and is visible to all technological civilisations. Hsu and Zee continue to argue that a message in the CMB would be identical to all observers across space and time, and that the information content can be reasonably large (thousands of bits)."


There are, Hippke found, several problems with these claims. The first is that the CMB is still cooling. It started at about 3,000 Kelvin; now, 13.4 billion years later, it's 2.7 Kelvin. As the Universe continues to age, eventually the CMB will become undetectable. It may take another 10 duodecillion years (1040), but the CMB will fade.


Putting that aside, physicists found back in 2006, in response to Hsu and Zee's paper, that it's extremely unlikely the CMB would appear exactly the same in the sky to different observers in different locations. In addition, Hippke argues, we can't see the entire CMB because of foreground emission from the Milky Way. And we only have one sky to measure, which presents an inherent statistical uncertainty in every cosmological observation we make.




Based on these constraints, Hippke estimates that the information content would be much lower than that proposed by Hsu and Zee - just 1,000 bits. This gave him a good framework for the actual search for the message.


The Planck satellite and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) both observed and recorded the temperature fluctuations in the CMB. It was from these datasets that Hippke extracted his bitstream, comparing the results from each dataset to find matching bits.


The first 500 bits of the message are pictured below. The values in black were identical in both Planck and WMAP datasets, and are thought to be accurate with 90 percent probability. The values in red deviate; Hippke chose the Planck values, and they are only accurate with 60 percent probability.


binary.jpg
(M. Hippke, arXiv, 2020)

Changing the values, he found, did not improve the situation. Searching the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences returned no convincing results, nor did shifting the data to approximate the infinite future.


"I find no meaningful message in the actual bit-stream," Hippke wrote.


"We may conclude that there is no obvious message on the CMB sky. Yet it remains unclear whether there is (was) a Creator, whether we live in a simulation, or whether the message is printed correctly in the previous section, but we fail to understand it."


Whether or not any of these options is the case, the CMB has a lot more to tell us, as beautifully noted in a 2005 response to Hsu and Zee.


"The CMB sky does encode a wealth of information about the structure of the cosmos and possibly about the nature of physics at the highest energy levels," wrote physicists Douglas Scott and James Zibin of the University of British Columbia.


"The Universe has left us a message all on its own."


Hippke's paper can be read in full on arXiv.
 
You don't need to look outside our solar system to find a message. You just need to listen quietly while hiking in a national park with no cell service.
 
So he found literally nothing, and they're linking to his arXiv because the paper hasn't even been peer-reviewed or published yet (if it ever will be, the thing reads more like a blog post than a physics paper).

How is this news, ScienceAlert?
 
a pair of physicists proposed that if there was a Creator, they could have encoded a message in the background radiation of the Universe

I'm certainly no creationist, but why do so many people think that if an intelligent life form created earth/the universe then it must by necessity have written "copyright God 14 billion BC" on it somewhere? It's such a stupid theory that the only way I can believe an adult would even bother testing it is because they knew it would fail and just want their dick sucked by fellow enlightened atheists for BTFOing the fundies yet again.

Not to mention the hubris of thinking that you could see the inner workings of reality, an impossibly complex set of intentionally obfuscated rules designed by an infinitely intelligent and powerful extra-dimensional entity, by looking really hard at it with a telescope. It's like pressing your face against your monitor in hopes of seeing the Windows source code.

If you're going to try and prove there is no God, do it in a way that's not completely dumb as shit.
 
Okay but like who made God so God could create the universe?

See this is why the Mormons will eventually be proven right. Apparently humans and gods are part of an eternal propagation cycle, with all humans having the potential to become gods themselves and continue the cycle.
So our god is just some guy from another universe who was righteous enough to become a god and create his own universe.
But, what the Mormons don't mention is that there's probably a steep learning curve to being god, so mistakes were probably made from the start. Now god is laying low out of embarrassment after he screwed up making humans the first time when the dinosaurs took over, and after that whole Old Testament and Jesus debacle.

"OH SHIT! OOPS! CAN I TAKE THAT BACK? OH SHIT..."

Basically. Yes.
 
"Wowbagger gazed for a moment at the fantastic jewelry of the night, the billions of tiny diamond worlds that dusted the infinite darkness with light. Every one, every single one was on his itinerary. Most of them he would be going to millions of times over.

He imagined for a moment his itinerary connecting all the dots in the sky like a child’s numbered dots puzzle. He hoped that from some vantage point in the Universe it might be seen to spell a very, very rude word."
 
You guys seem to have forgotten that modern physics has its foundations in a search for God. All those guys like Newton and Tycho Brahe believed that the ordered movement of the cosmos and the natural environment in general were signs of divine creation. Hell, even Einstein who first found out through quantum physics and relativity that god does in fact play dice with the universe wanted to be proven wrong even on his deathbed.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo