- Registrado
- 24 de Oct, 2020
I also heard he gave a ton of money to a guy who saved a guy from getting hit with a subway train.
2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.
- Iniciador del tema Pickle Dick
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
How in any way would that make New York or California COMPETITIVE?
- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2019
folllowing on what Ive said earlier the world economic forum deserves a lolcow thread
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Nov, 2019
Amazing Lucas has lost his shine during the BLM riots.
The black conservatives I watch are youngrippa59, Brandi Tatum, Hodge Twins, ABL and Jericho Green. Youngrappa59 is probably the best of the bunch and Brandon Tatum apparently has exploded in subscribers for the last few months. There is also Aaron Coleman as well.
CapricornusRex
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Feb, 2020
If anything shouldn't CA be losing value with how many of their tax paying citizens have moved? Shouldn't Idaho, Colorado, Arizona, and Texas be getting some of those 55 by now?
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2019
It’s hypothetically within the Senate’s right. Who exactly would force them? I mean, sure the SC could yell at them, but then they’d explain their reasoning (fraud) and remedy (goes to House). But there is a reason I called this a defiant coup, because that’s exactly what it would be and there’d be a low intensity civil war afterwards.
I did see an article talk about this, and I tried to search for it again, but it’s super hard to find anything on the election right now since it’s all “BIDEN WON”.
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2019
Not if you get illegal aliens to make up the numbers instead.
Shame about the state's economy though. Taxbase gonna crash through the floor.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2018
California is supposed to be losing one or two seats with this current/upcoming census/redistricting.
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Feb, 2015
I've heard there were better education programs but I can't remember what they are.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Nov, 2019
California is currently worth 55 electoral votes. Over 5 million votes in this state went to Trump, which is a record probably for most number of votes a republican has gotten here. It's about 33 percent of the popular vote. If it was done proportional, Biden would get like 37 votes and Trump like 18 votes. Republicans would actually bother to vote in deep blue shitholes as our votes truly matter and are not just a dick measuring contest for the popular vote.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
Oh, alright. I see what you mean. SPLIT the electoral votes proportionally and...
This would be done in every state. Its just the popular vote with extra steps. Sooo, not a good idea.
ditto
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2019
Who would write the dissent?
- Registrado
- 27 de Jun, 2014
Back in the day the original was loved because it made jokes the sequel couldn't possibly get away with, like "my retarded brother," a skit that features Borat waxing about his mentally-challenged brother who is kept in a cage and taunted until he eventually escapes and rapes his sister. That's a firm adherent to the comedy law of crossing the line twice, and it makes the comedy work because of the absurd overreach.
Basically it was a product of its time and like most things trying to tap into a property long after it's nonviable, the sequel takes no risks whatsoever because PC Culture has killed comedy entirely.
- Registrado
- 9 de Oct, 2019
End FPTP, get ID and PUBLIC OBSERVERS, end the mail in fuckery. (not the absentee ballots, just the mail ins) et voila. Without FPTP Cali would be getting eaten up by regionalists and New York would've imploded via 3rd parties long ago, the dems can't survive proper competition.
- Registrado
- 27 de Mayo, 2020
It all comes down to the mandatory education system. Back in the day, you got the education your parents could afford, ranging from learning on the farm as you go to high-end private tutorships. But then around the turn of the century (I think it was Wilson, but I'm not certain), the ruling came down that everyone needed to have what is now understood to be a high school-level education. When the problem of "what about us that can't afford that" came up, the government said "okay, we'll fund some public schools for the poor kids". Fast forward a hundred years, and we now have members of Congress saying that we need to ban private schools for teaching wrongthink. Public school was always a second-quality education, but the siren song of "free shit" outstripped the question of "is this really the best I can do for my child?"
Ginsburg
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2019
Or just split California into smaller states, which would be funny.
Only the hypothetical coastal states would stay blue.
- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2018
I mean, it's pretty obvious it's going to be the second point. Yes there's strong inclinations towards a lot of votes being fraudulent and a lot more that should never have been considered valid in the first place. But hey, after weeks of scrambling them in with the legitimate votes you can't tell exactly how many there are, so better just count them all. For democracy.I am really curious about how the Supreme Court's dissenting () opinion might read. The same for fact-checking sights, once they are called upon to actually address the evidence. Given clear evidence of a significant (even massive) level of voter fraud, how does one advance the argument that it still simply doesn't matter? Voter fraud is free speech? Better to let 100 invalid votes be counted, then let a single valid one be thrown out? Rest assured, it can be done. If you didn't already have the answer in front of you, you'd never figure out in a million years how the US Constitution akshually forbids abortion, but America's greatest legal minds found a way, and they made it stick. So they are sure to figure out some kind of justification, and you're bound to see it at the top of a lot of Reddit comment sections. The reasoning seems inconceivable in foresight, yet will become trite and banal in hindsight. Fascinating!
Which is going to be the exact opposite view of the people who want to invalidate the batches where we can't say for certain the votes actually were legitimate or not.
This is basically how massive voter fraud can continue for decades. Just make it impossible to discern between a genuine and fraudulent vote. Kinda like spiking the money supply with counterfeit currency that you can't differentiate from the real thing because the authentication security for the actual currency is piss poor
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
Now you know why everyone got so angry about the 2020 Census having a citizenship question.
Texas went for Trump 52-46, and is worth 38 votes; Biden would get 17 of them this year.
Florida only went for Trump 51-47, and is worth 29 votes; Biden would get 14 of those this year.
Republicans always eye CA and NY as some sort of prize if they can just come up with a clever enough scheme for splitting up votes. They forget what happens if that gets applied everywhere else.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 27 de Mayo, 2020
Perhaps unsurprisingly, I'm on the "throw it out" side. If your county or state is fucked up, that's your problem to unfuck, and don't come back until you've done just that.
- Registrado
- 16 de Mar, 2019
If its unanimous we get a concurrence which is a justice saying they agree with the decision in part or for different reasons, and maybe dissent in part.
- Estado