- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2020
Show of hands: who else here is happy they don't live in a large, dense, Democrat-controlled urban area?
2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.
- Iniciador del tema Pickle Dick
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
- Registrado
- 24 de Mar, 2017
I don't think any states seceding is at all likely any time soon. California is the one which makes the most noise (because it has the biggest GDP/population) and they're not even self sufficient in water. Their politicians know that and won't leave.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
I would raise my hand... but I do.
- Registrado
- 3 de Nov, 2018
This is one of those things I would have to see in order to believe; Obviously it would break the country, but the sheer potential salt-mining if they even go through with it and fail makes me wish that they will pull the trigger.OH NO THIS IS NOT GOOD
Stop the Steal — Start the Audit | The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Yes, it is true. Philadelphia did in fact keep poll watchers out. The baloney propaganda that they were allowed in...spectator.org
“In Pennsylvania, three Republican leaders told me they had already discussed the direct appointment of electors among themselves, and one said he had discussed it with Trump’s national campaign.
“I’ve mentioned it to them, and I hope they’re thinking about it too,” Lawrence Tabas, the Pennsylvania Republican Party’s chairman, told me. “I just don’t think this is the right time for me to be discussing those strategies and approaches, but [direct appointment of electors] is one of the options. It is one of the available legal options set forth in the Constitution.” He added that everyone’s preference is to get a swift and accurate count. “If the process, though, is flawed, and has significant flaws, our public may lose faith and confidence” in the election’s integrity.
Jake Corman, the state’s Senate majority leader, preferred to change the subject, emphasizing that he hoped a clean vote count would produce a final tally on Election Night. “The longer it goes on, the more opinions and the more theories and the more conspiracies [are] created,” he told me. If controversy persists as the safe-harbor date nears, he allowed, the legislature will have no choice but to appoint electors. “We don’t want to go down that road, but we understand where the law takes us, and we’ll follow the law.”
Republicans control both legislative chambers in the six most closely contested battleground states. Of those, Arizona and Florida have Republican governors, too. In Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, the governors are Democrats.”
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
DIRECT APPOINTMENT IS BEING DISCUSSED
Still they got to be hesitating to go that far, I could see them actually being charged with treason if they fuck it up lmao.
Smarty Pants
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Dic, 2018
I don't know man - this sounds a bit limp-dicked. I suppose all the voting software stuff is out the window since it's nowhere to be found in these lolsuits.
- Registrado
- 16 de Dic, 2019
Yeah that's my bad, I'm aware that's the case, I just can't think of a better shorthand that gets the point across, unless someone wants to enlighten me.
tigergrinder
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 5 de Jun, 2020
Wow, she's prettier there than in real life.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
More.... not something they need to allege. The Michigan legislature already announced an audit, and that will cover that entirely already. The lawsuits are for things that CAN'T be fixed by audits.
- Registrado
- 24 de Oct, 2020
Of course, Green iz best.
- Registrado
- 31 de Mayo, 2020
It will make the BLM riots look like nothing. The vast majority of young Americans don't understand how the system works because civics classes were cut. For them, it'll be like the fall of America under a Hitler like fascist who undermined their legitimate candidate and their poc #girlboss VP. They will believe that they are actually fighting for the soul of the nation. If trump pulls the insurrection act on them, Dems will impeach him again.
- Registrado
- 24 de Jun, 2020
I'm in the purple 'burbs, so I'm close enough to be concerned, but have don't have to go far to bug out to friendlier territory.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
Maybe all those 120 year olds used their wisened intellect to develop faster than light mail systems.
- Registrado
- 3 de Mayo, 2019
If the results were flipped the Right would be bitching about the Democrats dragging this out instead.
Shitposting aside everyone knew this was getting decided by a court regardless of who won.
- Registrado
- 24 de Jun, 2020
I could see it getting hijacked with #BlueLives Matter.
- Registrado
- 16 de Mar, 2019
If you resorted to fraud you've violated the Constitution already; you don't get to cry about any measures the Constitution allows that can be used to nullify it.
I recently connected with a fellow equestrienne so I'm taking a break, maybe I'll go upstate, do some riding and wait this out.
- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2020
I actually live in the suburbs of a large Blue city, but it's far enough the riots didn't come anywhere near and I'm pretty sure local police won't be taking any shit if they do. There are also no large or important government buildings here, so things should be safe here. Call it a perfect spot to watch the fireworks.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
Something I just realized should probably be said for those who don't know how electoral lawsuits woooork.
A few thing:
1: You can only file a lawsuit where you can show damage. So, losing the election or clear evidence of something being done to disadvantage you.
2: It has to be something for which there is no other remedy. If a recount or audit can find it, you can't sue for it.
3: Discovery is a thing. The initial complaint has to be enough that the judge deems there is a reasonable probability of fraud, and discovery lets you look into it with legal weight behind you.
A few thing:
1: You can only file a lawsuit where you can show damage. So, losing the election or clear evidence of something being done to disadvantage you.
2: It has to be something for which there is no other remedy. If a recount or audit can find it, you can't sue for it.
3: Discovery is a thing. The initial complaint has to be enough that the judge deems there is a reasonable probability of fraud, and discovery lets you look into it with legal weight behind you.
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2019
True. But you know what would make this more tolerable? The MSM not sucking Trump's cock 24/7 while trying to legitimise him.
That alone would be preferable to this active propaganda being shoved into everyone's face.
- Registrado
- 22 de Ago, 2020
Eyewitness testimony is the most or second most powerful evidence in the law, depending. There's nothing limp about this election lolsuit. It's a rock hard six inches. They get geeks access to the voting machines and specifically the code, it might get into Long Dong Silver territory even before Clarence Thomas gets involved.
- Registrado
- 16 de Ago, 2018
Fraud is fraud. I don’t care who does it and if we were seeing the same things flipped, it would still look bad. Between blocking people from watching the ballots being counted to outright ignoring the Supreme Court, these aren’t the actions of people that believe their candidate won fairly.
- Estado