Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Maybe they could even have the advanced students help teach the ones that are behind (as a peer helper).
That would really help the students below the advanced students since it means they could understand how their advanced peers would tackle a problem and such.
Interestingly enough, the same teacher who wouldn't allow me to check out the books that I wanted tried this with me. She had me trying to help some kid with an assignment; I think it was English or reading or something like that. I tried explaining it to him, but he flat-out didn't get it and pretty much expected me to do it for him. :sighduck:
(I wish that I either had my yearbooks nearby or could remember the guy's last name so I could look him up on Facebook; last time I saw his profile, his life looked like a train wreck.)

They'll try to get the definition of rape to not include men which no doubt can offend those who were raped regardless of gender since they know how serious it is and to exclude someone because of their gender would be a spit in both their eyes and the man that was raped.
In a lot of jurisdictions, the legal definition of "rape" doesn't include anything women are capable of doing. For example, a man can rape a woman or another man, but if a woman forcibly has sex with a man, the worst she can get charged with is sexual assault due to the legal definitions. I don't know many people--tumblrinas aside--who would argue that the latter scenario isn't also rape, but because she doesn't have a dick which she used to penetrate him, in legal terms, she did not "rape" him. It's really fucked up. *sigh*
 
Indeed. Many places define rape as 'forcible sexual penetration' or some permutation thereof. So men can rape women or other men, but women can only rape someone if they use a dildo (or broom handle or gun or rolling pin or any number of other things). Some jurisdictions also classify forced oral/sexual contact as rape, too, for psychos who make their victims go own on them.

An old (now FORMER) friend of mine is a lesbian and tried to molest me when I was visiting her at college. If a man had done half the shit she tried to do to me (fondling, groping, tried to climb in bed with me when she thought I was asleep), she probably would have been arrested. But I didn't call the police, because a) she's a woman, and b) it was Texas, a state not known for having very helpful views on sexual assault victims OR homosexuals.
 
Imagine if men tried to weasel out of rape accusations the way sjws do:

"Uh yeah your honour, I did have sex with her. No it wasn't consentual. Yes it was at knifepoint. NO IT'S NOT RAPE! Rape is warfare, I clearly was not at war, it was violent sexual assault. NO THAT'S NOT THE SAME THING! I'M NOT A RAPIST!"
 
Update on the 'How could you read to your children, you heartless monsters!' story:
Could someone please point me towards the nearest person that needs to be punched?
 
Look at all these genders......

YOrVvkY.jpg
 
I wonder how they feel about female-on-female rape.
SJWs only care for about 1/4 of potential rape cases.
the rest they laugh at.
and then they cry about how DAT EVIL RAPE CULTURE
let's face it.
they're rapists, or supporter of rapists.
it's bad enough they are racist, sexist, trans and homophobic. but they're fine with rape too.
 
I remember a bunch of them agreeing that rape is strictly a "male thing" as someone that had a very uncomfortable experience with a woman as a kid it really pisses me off that they act like its nonexistent and instead cry about metaphorical rape
another thing is they usually do that bugs me is that they always bring up "surveys" that they can't show, just say it exists. Because we all know SJWs are the most honest of folk
 
"instead of being watered down into any form of... assault"
oh, you mean like people that think staring at a woman is rape?
or people that say "that man openned a door, that was rape"
HMMM?!
It's fun when you play with words, isn't it? I mean, I can just as easily say "It's not rape if she had a few drinks" or "It's not rape if she said no, but her eyes said yes."

Making words mean something other than what they mean is a game anyone can play. SJWs aren't the first to try it, and they're not especially good at it.
 
How the hell are you supposed to keep track of all this shit?!
Not to mention that none of it is even a gender, or approaching the concept of a gender. It's just a description of a small segment of your personality. You might as well say "Puts ketchup on a hot dog" is a gender, or "Laughs at Will Ferrell movies" is a gender.

And yes, I'm quite sure some tumblrinas don't see a problem with that.
 
Not to mention that none of it is even a gender, or approaching the concept of a gender. It's just a description of a small segment of your personality. You might as well say "Puts ketchup on a hot dog" is a gender, or "Laughs at Will Ferrell movies" is a gender.

And yes, I'm quite sure some tumblrinas don't see a problem with that.
a lot of them seem to just be sexual kinks, and they made it a sexuality for SPESHUL SNAWFLOOKS POYNTS
technically they are called sexual preference, but it has nothing to do with gender.
and some of them happen to many people, but most people don't give it a name BECAUSE IT DOESNT FUCKING MATTER

just saying that as a
orio-autogyne-homomakednosphilia
 
Atrás
Top Abajo