AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn’s criminal case

AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn’s criminal case



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Thursday said it is dropping the criminal case against President Donald Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, abandoning a prosecution that became a rallying cry for Trump and his supporters in attacking the FBI’s Russia investigation.

The move is a stunning reversal for one of the signature cases brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. It comes even though prosecutors for the last three years had maintained that Flynn had lied to the FBI about his conversations with the Russian ambassador in a January 2017 interview. Flynn himself admitted as much, and became a key cooperator for Mueller as he investigated ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

In court documents being filed Thursday, the Justice Department said it is dropping the case “after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information.” The documents were obtained by The Associated Press.

The Justice Department said it had concluded that Flynn’s interview by the FBI was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn” and that the interview on January 24, 2017 was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”

The U.S. attorney reviewing the Flynn case, Jeff Jensen, recommended the move to Attorney General William Barr last week and formalized the recommendation in a document this week.

“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case,” Jensen said in a statement. “I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.”

The decision is certain to be embraced by Trump, who has relentlessly tweeted about the case and last week pronounced Flynn “exonerated,” and energize supporters who have taken up the retired Army lieutenant general as something of a cause celebre. But it may also add to Democratic concerns that Attorney General William Barr is excessively loyal to the president, and could be a distraction for a Justice Department that for months has sought to focus on crimes arising from the coronavirus.

The Justice Department’s action comes amid an internal review into the handling of the case and an aggressive effort by Flynn’s lawyers to challenge the basis for the prosecution. The lawyers cited newly disclosed FBI emails and notes last week to allege that Flynn was entrapped into lying when agents interviewed him at the White House days after Trump’s inauguration. Though none of the documents appeared to undercut the central allegation that Flynn had lied to the FBI, Trump last week pronounced him “exonerated

The decision is the latest dramatic turn in a years-old case full of twists and turns. In recent months, his attorneys have leveled a series of allegations about the FBI’s actions and asked to withdraw his guilty plea. A judge has rejected most of the claims and not ruled on others, including the bid to revoke the plea.

The decision comes as Barr has increasingly challenged the Russia investigation, saying in a television interview last month that it was started “without any basis.” In February, he overruled a decision by prosecutors in the Roger Stone case in favor of a more lenient recommended sentence for the longtime Trump friend.
 
Derp, meant to link this too. It's the government's motion to drop the case, courtesy of John Solomon's site.

Wasn't this the first guy the deep state tried to screw over with "muh Russia?" It's all downhill from here, baby.

Depends, technically he was the fourth to be "investigated." But he was the first one that they had to take action to knock off because he was actually going to be in one of the best positions to find out about what the fuck the intelligence operatives were doing and put a stop to them.

They also had to go after Jeff Sessions, who was going to be heading the DoJ, to get him out of the way so that Rosenstein could appoint Mueller to be the special prosecutor. They interviewed Sessions on a bunch of Russia shit the same way they interviewed Flynn, and duped Sessions into to a recusal. But had he stood firm they probably would have tried to frame him the same way they tried to frame Flynn.
 
Domino one. Now put Comey, Wray, Rothstein, Clapper and Brennan in a federal pound-me-in-the-ass penitentiary.
 
I do like how all the people screaming he lied never reply to the fact that his son was threatened.

it truly is great to see people crying foal while clearly having read none of the documents.
 
Última edición:
I do like how all the people screaming he lied never reply to the fact that his son was threatened.

it truly is great to see people crying foal while clearly having read none of the documents.
Even if Flynn confessed rather than simply entered a plea of guilty, the false confession rate is incredibly high due to the psychology of interrogations and the shit that the FBI and law enforcement can and will do to you to get the conviction they want. Something like 25-27% of people who were convicted and later exonerated of fucking homicide gave false confessions.
 
Even if Flynn confessed rather than simply entered a plea of guilty, the false confession rate is incredibly high due to the psychology of interrogations and the shit that the FBI and law enforcement can and will do to you to get the conviction they want.

Oh, I am very well aware.

It’s this kind of fuckery that dissuaded me from going into law.
 
EXcOXvrXYAAklmi.png
EXcOEhnWkAcA_4n.jpg
45a4c80b4dd7b61e9214bd7857f88af2.png

I love how the DOJ's dismissal went well out of its way to highlight Strzok and Page bragging about how the "FBI's incompetence in this case actually helped" them. How's that fuck-up helping you now, Lovebirds? Not only that, but they stepped way out to the side to state that not only was there no legitimate, legal reason for the FBI to interview Flynn, but that there wasn't even satisfactory evidence to prove that Flynn lied to the FBI in the first place.

Welcome to the trap, dipshits.
 
>>But he plead guilty!
This is actually a huge problem in our judicial system: Everyone is almost always encouraged by their defense to plead guilty, even if they are not, in order to get a plea deal and wrap things up quickly; The courts love it because it avoids having to waste time on a jury trial, so they in tern give generous sentences to encourage the practice.

Even with the plea agreement, Flynn racked up an over $5 million legal bill (and apparently still owes $4.6 million). What kind of normal American could even begin to afford that? That's probably more than double what Flynn made in his entire 30+ year career.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 1277312 Ver archivo adjunto 1277311 Ver archivo adjunto 1277319

I love how the DOJ's dismissal went well out of its way to highlight Strzok and Page bragging about how the "FBI's incompetence in this case actually helped" them. How's that fuck-up helping you now, Lovebirds? Not only that, but they stepped way out to the side to state that not only was there no legitimate, legal reason for the FBI to interview Flynn, but that there wasn't even satisfactory evidence to prove that Flynn lied to the FBI in the first place.

Welcome to the trap, dipshits.
I don't know what Flynn's plans are just yet, but I really hope he pursues for every bit of damages he can get from these people personally. I did like when he tweeted this video back on the 29th. The winds, they are changing.
 
Twitter is fucking loaded right now with insane, shrieking people who:

  • Do not understand the difference between a guilty plea and a confession
  • Do not understand why a person would, under normal circumstances, plead guilty to a crime they did not commit
  • Do not understand that some of the shit that’s surfaced in recent weeks indicates that things were going on (threats against Flynn’s family, for one) that are anything but normal circumstances
So everyone’s screaming “BUT HE CONFESSED” and it’s fucking awesome.
General Flynn is not a young black man who dindu nuffin and was gawn to collidge.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 1277312 Ver archivo adjunto 1277311 Ver archivo adjunto 1277319

I love how the DOJ's dismissal went well out of its way to highlight Strzok and Page bragging about how the "FBI's incompetence in this case actually helped" them. How's that fuck-up helping you now, Lovebirds? Not only that, but they stepped way out to the side to state that not only was there no legitimate, legal reason for the FBI to interview Flynn, but that there wasn't even satisfactory evidence to prove that Flynn lied to the FBI in the first place.

Welcome to the trap, dipshits.
Yeah boi we gettin downright fuckin KARMIC all up in this bitch
 
I hope Flynn takes these motherfuckers for everything they got. Their great great great great grand children will be paying for their shitty behavior.

Edit: I feel bad about posting that. Their ancestor shouldn't have to pay for their sins. But on the other hand, fuck em.
 
Última edición:
Even if Flynn confessed rather than simply entered a plea of guilty, the false confession rate is incredibly high due to the psychology of interrogations and the shit that the FBI and law enforcement can and will do to you to get the conviction they want. Something like 25-27% of people who were convicted and later exonerated of fucking homicide gave false confessions.

They take advantage of the fact that most people are agreeable. And their fear of the unknown vs. The comfort of certainty. Putting 100% of your life in the hands of 12 strangers is far more terrifying then just saying what the authorities want you to say and only giving up 25% of your life.

My brief experiences with the legal system however show that you are never served by giving the people in charge what they want. Like the time I got a traffic ticket for "passing on the shoulder". It was total bullshit. I was exiting the highway and maybe went 2 car lengths on the shoulder in slow traffic to enter the exit lane. But under the very specific interpretation of the mighty tome of the State Traffic Code the trooper who pulled me over had me dead to rights. In a delightful "safety corridor" too boot. Which means what would be a 25 dollar fine under law could be a 500 dollar fine instead.

Of course the judge that day was having none of it. It was busy and the states attorney earlier had botched things in unrelated manner and he was in a bad mood towards the state for taking up so much time for no effect. To move things along he simply said "everyone who wants to plead guilty, just line up and we will get you out of here. Most of the room did. Me and a few holdouts stuck around. The first person called up was also there, for the same reason, by the same cop. Judge gave him a warning and told him to be more careful. I came up, he looked at my file,looked at the cop and asked "same thing?" Cop said yes. He then dismissed it too. Apparently that cop had been ambushing people at the exit for days and they had all piled up on the judges desk and he had had enough.

Never plead guilty.
 
They take advantage of the fact that most people are agreeable. And their fear of the unknown vs. The comfort of certainty. Putting 100% of your life in the hands of 12 strangers is far more terrifying then just saying what the authorities want you to say and only giving up 25% of your life.

My brief experiences with the legal system however show that you are never served by giving the people in charge what they want. Like the time I got a traffic ticket for "passing on the shoulder". It was total bullshit. I was exiting the highway and maybe went 2 car lengths on the shoulder in slow traffic to enter the exit lane. But under the very specific interpretation of the mighty tome of the State Traffic Code the trooper who pulled me over had me dead to rights. In a delightful "safety corridor" too boot. Which means what would be a 25 dollar fine under law could be a 500 dollar fine instead.

Of course the judge that day was having none of it. It was busy and the states attorney earlier had botched things in unrelated manner and he was in a bad mood towards the state for taking up so much time for no effect. To move things along he simply said "everyone who wants to plead guilty, just line up and we will get you out of here. Most of the room did. Me and a few holdouts stuck around. The first person called up was also there, for the same reason, by the same cop. Judge gave him a warning and told him to be more careful. I came up, he looked at my file,looked at the cop and asked "same thing?" Cop said yes. He then dismissed it too. Apparently that cop had been ambushing people at the exit for days and they had all piled up on the judges desk and he had had enough.

Never plead guilty.
The court system is interesting in terms of what can happen when it's overloaded. One story I remember is from a guy who did an AMA about how to deal with debt collectors. His OP included a story that I find to be very relevant, in the wake of so many people being angry about the DSP stuff.

A guy got into bad debt with a credit card company, and got sued by a collection agency and issued a court summons. He did some basic internet research on how to defend himself pro se at the initial hearing. He dressed up nice, got his documents together, and went to court, to find the collection agency's attorney going through an enormous pile of cases and the judge reviewing one case at a time. 90% of the debtors had not made their court date and had default judgments entered against them, basically meaning the collection agency was now entitled to seize their shit to cover the debts. They got to the AMA's OP, he stepped forward to present his side of the case, the collection agency's attorney just replied "NOPE I'm dropping the case" and it was dismissed and his debt discharged. The OP took a moment while things were being squared away to ask the attorney why he'd dropped the case, and the reply was something along the lines of "Because we bought your debt for a few cents on the dollar, I have over a hundred of these cases today, go away, you're welcome."

A wise man once described litigation as "A machine which you go into as a pig and come out of as a sausage." It takes forever and is ruinously expensive, and people on both sides tend to do whatever they can to avoid it.
 
the level of Hoes Mad by the lefty blue checks on Twitter is absolutely glorious, and seeing CNN cry about it is also a treat. Flynn got fucking railroaded. I hope he returns the favor, but doesn't chump and settle. Things are about to get very exceptional
 
Atrás
Top Abajo