🐮 Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Why were you placed in foster care if your parents were so loving and gave you such a great childhood?

Where did I say they gave me a great childhood?

I said my upbringing was a blessing because I wasn't engulfed in parents who pulled me toward false elohims. Lots of people come from two parent homes where the parents put strong expectations on them of joining certain religions.
I was free to choose my own path

She can't let a single challenge go unanswered. It's her narcissistic ego being damaged, and it's yet more compulsive behavior. She cannot stand the thought that no one buys her defense of Marshall, it infuriates her that we have her number, and she has to answer every accusation. She hates being exposed for what she is: a mediocre mind with no accomplishments. A self-righteous shrew with no reason to feel righteous in either her religious or personal morality. A woman who has had a long string of unsatisfactory, abusive relationships resulting in children. A mother who willfully exposes those children to abuse, either her own or Marshall's. A grifter who lives on the sufferance of the very government and taxpayers she despises. Hell, she can't even admit to making mistakes with grammar. spelling, or punctuation, claiming that all of that is caused by word filters aimed specifically at her and no one else. At least while she's compulsively reading and responding here she isn't beating her kids. Just neglecting them, and I'll bet they're used to that. Go play video games, momma needs to yell at strangers on the internet.

This is just a string of made up fairytales. PASS

Out of curiosity, did your mother ever tell you you were too demanding or clingy? Like, were you one of those kids that got yelled at because they kept trying to get mommy's attention all day? You seem to think a mother's only existence is to serve her children non-stop.

I made this since she isn't answering my question.
Ver archivo adjunto 1255479
The text box says "TORAH TORAH TORAH TORAH MARSHALL RAPE TORAH ACADEMIA TORAH TORAH PIRATES TORAH NOAH MOVIE" if you were wondering.

EDIT: Ah, shoot, I forgot to add "TORAH SWINDLING A YOUNG DISABLED MAN OUT OF HIS MONEY TORAH". Ah, well. Perhaps next time.

I think you meant SWEETY?

In a different thread, @xtamarlover validated the claim that Melinda and Marshall moved in together after only about 3 months. Why would they not be living together now, unless Marshall’s probation officer/judge ruled that he’s not safe to be around kids.

You are relying on a compulsive liar for information? He doesn't have the timeline correct. But he also knows many of you are moronic enough to believe everything he says.

And yet here he is on the farms talking about you and your family. You're an idiot and a tard.

No actually, you are the idiot and tard. Because obviously he isn't talking ON THIS THREAD.

First of all, the nerve you have to cry about victim blaming. You've been victim blaming all over the place when we were discussing Marshal's Ex. You're absolutely shameless. SHAMELESS.

Also, no one here said it was the person's fault for getting abused. It absolutely isn't. Victims of abuse tend to continue the circle of abuse by unconsciously choosing new abusers. Or they display certain traits (e.g. overlooking red flags, because they were conditioned to do that) which makes it easier for abusers to prey on them. That's not their fault, but it it's a fact that this happens. But you don't really care anyways unless you can use it to attack someone, so why explain this to you?

Also, if this is incorrect I request some proof. Or is it only incorrect because you don't like it?



You know, maybe if you had chosen a man who loved and respected you from the very beginning, he'd not abuse you, Melinda.

Let me put this in big bold letters so you don't miss it this time:
SHE WASN'T A VICTIM. So no, I haven't victim blamed her one bit. You want to ASSUME she is the victim simply because she is a woman. That reinforces your Patriarchy and internalized misogyny. You seek to make woman the "untouchable angel" (dehumanization of woman) by trying to deem "innocent" any woman who has been touched harshly by a man and then deem "guilty" or "villain" the man who did it. You want to know who here really lacks self-awareness? Take a look at you and your fellow comrades.

There is no "fact" that a person chooses abusers. It's a false theory. Abusers wear masks. They lie, charm and deceive to get involved in relationships. All the "red flags" theory is false horseshit too. It's just another way of victim blaming. NO ONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ABUSE EXCEPT THE PERSON WHO DOES IT. That's the point.

So is your false theory of believing that if you just pick the right guy than you won't be mistreated, wronged, or abused. A complete contradiction among pagans, really. On the one hand you pagans love to say "no one is perfect" and then on the other hand you blame victims by saying they shouldn't excuse any little mishap in other's behavior or else it's their fault for that imperfect person's bad behavior that led to the break up. Your moral theories are hollow and full of holes.

 

[LoverofPi]

Linda has rate this post with a disagree, which rather confuses me. What, exactly, are you disagreeing with, @TamarYaelBatYah ?

Are you disagreeing that you said you know where we live? If not, then what?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So new nuggets of information Linda let slip:

Marshal spent 4 years in prison. Yeesh.

She was in foster homes. Which implies abuse or neglect, or her parents and extended family not being there or being able to take care of her for some reason.

I'm such a tard, I just realized the torah is Linda's fetish. It all makes sense now.

I never said Marshall spent 4 years in prison

 

[redcent]

Hey I have an idea if you change your avatar to a woman with bare shoulders or a short skirt Linda will shut up and won't talk back to you.

Maybe then she'd fuck off from the thread

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Thing is though you can't debate worth shit. it's probably because of your poor upbringing and the shitty schools you went to. Also, since you don't actually read the Hebrew Bible you are a pagan. After all, you still refuse to read the Tanakh. All you know is the word "Torah" because it's easy to spell. Hell, you think Jesus is the Messiah. No real J ew thinks that. Face it, you're just another pagan because your beliefs fall flat against real j ews .

No "real J-e-w-s" think Yahushua is The Messiah? are you serious?
Pop quiz: What ethnicity were Yahushua's first disciples (that believed he was The Messiah)?
(1) Iranian
(2) Jewish
(3) German

Ver archivo adjunto 1256169

@TamarYaelBatYah Do you know what COINTELPRO is/was?

Anyone who uses the word "nigga" like that that many times in a comment automatically disqualifies the credibility of their statements

Citing your own article isn’t proof. It’s an opinion piece, not a factual one.

Women are objects in the Bible

Also, a real Torah follower has informed us that it is, in fact, not a sin.

Our Laws are not based on the Torah. We have separation of church and state as well as the first Amendment for a reason, Melinda. I do not, nor will I ever, follow the Torah, so therefore you cannot tell me what I am or am not doing is a sin.

Citing your own article IS proof. It's called an ORIGINAL ESSAY. And it's full of COMPLETE facts.

My writing completely debunks that entire article you posted. That's a horribly written article because it cherry picks verses. That's called BAD exegesis.

The site looks cheesy too.

 

[LoverofPi]

You are relying on a compulsive liar for information? He doesn't have the timeline correct. But he also knows many of you are moronic enough to believe everything he says.

If we relied on you we'd be relying on a compulsive liar anyways, Linda.

Let me put this in big bold letters so you don't miss it this time:
SHE WASN'T A VICTIM. So no, I haven't victim blamed her one bit. You want to ASSUME she is the victim simply because she is a woman. That reinforces your Patriarchy and internalized misogyny. You seek to make woman the "untouchable angel" (dehumanization of woman) by trying to deem "innocent" any woman who has been touched harshly by a man and then deem "guilty" or "villain" the man who did it. You want to know who here really lacks self-awareness? Take a look at you and your fellow comrades.

There is no "fact" that a person chooses abusers. It's a false theory. Abusers wear masks. They lie, charm and deceive to get involved in relationships. All the "red flags" theory is false horseshit too. It's just another way of victim blaming. NO ONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ABUSE EXCEPT THE PERSON WHO DOES IT. That's the point.

So is your false theory of believing that if you just pick the right guy than you won't be mistreated, wronged, or abused. A complete contradiction among pagans, really. On the one hand you pagans love to say "no one is perfect" and then on the other hand you blame victims by saying they shouldn't excuse any little mishap in other's behavior or else it's their fault for that imperfect person's bad behavior that led to the break up. Your moral theories are hollow and full of holes.

Oh, I see how this works out. Other women are not victims because they deserved what they had coming.

Try this on for size, Linda. No one deserves to be physically injured by another, especially not their significant other, be they man or woman or what have you. Doing it deliberately makes someone an abuser, man or woman, and the one abused their victim, again, man or woman.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

So new nuggets of information Linda let slip:

Marshal spent 4 years in prison. Yeesh.

She was in foster homes. Which implies abuse or neglect, or her parents and extended family not being there or being able to take care of her for some reason.

I'm such a tard, I just realized the torah is Linda's fetish. It all makes sense now.

What????? That's way out of line for a pretty simple domestic battery, even with injuries. Can you post the content to back it up, please?

If The Torah doesn't say it's not a "sin", it isn't wrong.

The Torah (and by extension, "The Bible") does NOT say women are property

https://www.academia.edu/40552146/Is_Woman_an_Object_in_The_Torah_A_Rebuttal_to_Ken_Stone

Stalking is a sin in The Torah. But I'm not debating that publicly. Doing so would require me to expose secret knowledge. Not doing that.

You're a human garbagecan. Also a anthropomorphised cum dumpster. You're a receptacle of filth. Only the foolhardiest sage would invest you with any knowledge of the sacred. When you assert, people, in general, laugh. What a horrid existence.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Hey Linda, you said you married marshal in an originally loveless marriage on principle. What principle is that? Were you scared to be single because the torah told you to be married? Is that the only reason?

I never said I didn't love him at the beginning of the marriage. I said that I chose to marry him based on principles and THEN let the love follow. So during our Shidduch (potential marriage partner interview) I was very guarded, didn't try to make choices based on feelings or lust only. After I questioned him a lot and realized he was compatible and shared my life values, I allowed me heart to open to him.

The principle that I chose him on: That he seeks Torah and fears YHWH. He knows Elohim the way I do.

Me scared to be single? LOL, hardly. I turned down other men over the years. Especially any time one of them told me the man was "head of the house". I got cussed out by one or two of them for turning them down for not accepting their patriarchal view of The Torah. I turned down other men for other reasons too. I chose to stay single instead of parting with my principles.

You're a human garbagecan. Also a anthropomorphised cum dumpster. You're a receptacle of filth. Only the foolhardiest sage would invest you with any knowledge of the sacred. When you assert, people, in general, laugh. What a horrid existence.

Says the person who doesn't believe in The Torah. Like I'm supposed to take these types of comments as anything but vomit from the mouth of a fool?

 

[Suburban Bastard]

Your ass is a fool.

 

[Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake]

Says the person who doesn't believe in The Torah. Like I'm supposed to take these types of comments as anything but vomit from the mouth of a fool?

This is why I return to this thread: you sum yourself up perfectly and still don't have the self awareness to see how hilarious it is, Shiksa.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

No one deserves to be physically injured by another, especially not their significant other,

Disagree (in context of spouses). If someone constantly verbally or mentally abuses their spouse and the abused spouse cannot escape the marriage due to barriers of whatever kind, then the inevitable outcome is that the oppressed spouse is going to physically lash out. There is no way around it. An verbally or mentally abused person will eventually physically lash out when they are trapped. A physically abused spouse is likely to hit back at some point. It's part of the human will to survive.

In which case, I simply cannot pity the physically injured oppressive spouse. They provoked it.

 

[SS Reichsmarshall]

Anyone who uses the word "nigga" like that that many times in a comment automatically disqualifies the credibility of their statements

Okay. Did you sign up yet to receive the $1200 from the IRS for the corona bailout? You can get it in the mail or electronically deposited to your bank account.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Where did I say they gave me a great childhood?

I said my upbringing was a blessing because I wasn't engulfed in parents who pulled me toward false elohims. Lots of people come from two parent homes where the parents put strong expectations on them of joining certain religions.
I was free to choose my own path




This is just a string of made up fairytales. PASS

Out of curiosity, did your mother ever tell you you were too demanding or clingy? Like, were you one of those kids that got yelled at because they kept trying to get mommy's attention all day? You seem to think a mother's only existence is to serve her children non-stop.





I think you meant SWEETY?





You are relying on a compulsive liar for information? He doesn't have the timeline correct. But he also knows many of you are moronic enough to believe everything he says.






No actually, you are the idiot and tard. Because obviously he isn't talking ON THIS THREAD.





Let me put this in big bold letters so you don't miss it this time:
SHE WASN'T A VICTIM. So no, I haven't victim blamed her one bit. You want to ASSUME she is the victim simply because she is a woman. That reinforces your Patriarchy and internalized misogyny. You seek to make woman the "untouchable angel" (dehumanization of woman) by trying to deem "innocent" any woman who has been touched harshly by a man and then deem "guilty" or "villain" the man who did it. You want to know who here really lacks self-awareness? Take a look at you and your fellow comrades.

There is no "fact" that a person chooses abusers. It's a false theory. Abusers wear masks. They lie, charm and deceive to get involved in relationships. All the "red flags" theory is false horseshit too. It's just another way of victim blaming. NO ONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ABUSE EXCEPT THE PERSON WHO DOES IT. That's the point.

So is your false theory of believing that if you just pick the right guy than you won't be mistreated, wronged, or abused. A complete contradiction among pagans, really. On the one hand you pagans love to say "no one is perfect" and then on the other hand you blame victims by saying they shouldn't excuse any little mishap in other's behavior or else it's their fault for that imperfect person's bad behavior that led to the break up. Your moral theories are hollow and full of holes.

Ah, so my original theory was off. it was your FOSTER FATHERS who fucked you, though I will hold to my previous assesment regarding your mother, and her motivations... gotcha... just gets worse and worse... SMH

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Says the person who doesn't believe in The Torah. Like I'm supposed to take these types of comments as anything but vomit from the mouth of a fool?

Seems pretty autistic to think someone's an inferior being because of their religious affiliation. And before you pull the "YOU HATE ME CUZ I'M JEWISH!!!" thing, no, we hate you because you're a despicable human being.

In which case, I simply cannot pity the physically injured oppressive spouse. They provoked it.

Well then I can't pity the jailed abusive spouse. They provoked it.
That's pretty shite logic.

Let me put this in big bold letters so you don't miss it this time:
SHE WASN'T A VICTIM. So no, I haven't victim blamed her one bit. You want to ASSUME she is the victim simply because she is a woman. That reinforces your Patriarchy and internalized misogyny. You seek to make woman the "untouchable angel" (dehumanization of woman) by trying to deem "innocent" any woman who has been touched harshly by a man and then deem "guilty" or "villain" the man who did it. You want to know who here really lacks self-awareness? Take a look at you and your fellow comrades.

Mad?

 

[LoverofPi]

Disagree (in context of spouses). If someone constantly verbally or mentally abuses their spouse and the abused spouse cannot escape the marriage due to barriers of whatever kind, then the inevitable outcome is that the oppressed spouse is going to physically lash out. There is no way around it. An verbally or mentally abused person will eventually physically lash out when they are trapped. A physically abused spouse is likely to hit back at some point. It's part of the human will to survive.

In which case, I simply cannot pity the physically injured oppressive spouse. They provoked it.

So you think violence is an acceptable response to speech, then?

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Says the person who doesn't believe in The Torah. Like I'm supposed to take these types of comments as anything but vomit from the mouth of a fool?

Only a fool would hold a 3000 yr old book as truth. You are a menace. And all those like you. You should be burned like a witch for all to see in the town commons.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Out of curiosity, did your mother ever tell you you were too demanding or clingy? Like, were you one of those kids that got yelled at because they kept trying to get mommy's attention all day? You seem to think a mother's only existence is to serve her children non-stop.

Lol, no. Then again, I spent my childhood in a real school with real teachers. Your children, by contrast, are being neglected and raised in ignorance. You chose to homeschool despite a complete lack of qualifications or capability. The least you can do is actually pretend to be doing it. Bitching on the internet isn't teaching your children. Apparently cable TV (so worldly!) and video games are teaching your children. Oh, and they're learning from Marshall that it's OK to be violent toward those you profess to care about. That pattern is going to repeat itself, guaranteed.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Lol, no. Then again, I spent my childhood in a real school with real teachers. Your children, by contrast, are being neglected and raised in ignorance. You chose to homeschool despite a complete lack of qualifications or capability. The least you can do is actually pretend to be doing it. Bitching on the internet isn't teaching your children. Apparently cable TV (so worldly!) and video games are teaching your children. Oh, and they're learning from Marshall that it's OK to be violent toward those you profess to care about. That pattern is going to repeat itself, guaranteed.

Imagine having a 5 letter word ( or 3, if you're 'Linda who doesn't do vowels) as your standby ( and only) defense of the utter degeneracy of your childrearing... pitiable......
When called to account before her final Judge, Melinda will sound like that Kamikaze Jap pilot from that gay old movie.... "Torah! Torah! Torah!!"

 

[Deadpool]

Apparently cable TV (so worldly!) and video games are teaching your children

If I had to choose between TV/video games, or Melinda teaching my children I'd choose TV and video games instantly every time. Honestly they'd learn better morals from GTA 5 than from her too.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Ah, so my original theory was off. it was your FOSTER FATHERS who fucked you, though I will hold to my previous assesment regarding your mother, and her motivations... gotcha... just gets worse and worse... SMH

None of the members of any foster families I lived with tried to molest me. Although I have heard it happening to foster children by foster siblings, foster parents, etc. It's unfortunate, and I do feel their heartache. I hope that Elohim avenges them.

The real irony was is that I was neglected as a foster child too LOL. They hardly noticed me. Most of the families just wanted the cash benefits of having foster children

So you think violence is an acceptable response to speech, then?

Well, in all fairness, I used the words VERBAL ABUSE

But, speech too, yeah...

"A fool’s words get him into fights;
yes, his mouth calls out for a beating." (Prov. 18:6)