🐮 Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Karl der Grosse]

She can't let a single challenge go unanswered. It's her narcissistic ego being damaged, and it's yet more compulsive behavior. She cannot stand the thought that no one buys her defense of Marshall, it infuriates her that we have her number, and she has to answer every accusation. She hates being exposed for what she is: a mediocre mind with no accomplishments. A self-righteous shrew with no reason to feel righteous in either her religious or personal morality. A woman who has had a long string of unsatisfactory, abusive relationships resulting in children. A mother who willfully exposes those children to abuse, either her own or Marshall's. A grifter who lives on the sufferance of the very government and taxpayers she despises. Hell, she can't even admit to making mistakes with grammar. spelling, or punctuation, claiming that all of that is caused by word filters aimed specifically at her and no one else. At least while she's compulsively reading and responding here she isn't beating her kids. Just neglecting them, and I'll bet they're used to that. Go play video games, momma needs to yell at strangers on the internet.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Was it a good bagel? I'm finishing off my coffee before I finally get some sleep.

Yeah it was an alright bagel, not sure if it'll get me through another day of Melinda yet

Truly my bagel was the most important topic on this thread

 

[UnFuNnYmEmE]

Go play video games, momma needs to yell at strangers on the internet.

I made this since she isn't answering my question.

The text box says "TORAH TORAH TORAH TORAH MARSHALL RAPE TORAH ACADEMIA TORAH TORAH PIRATES TORAH NOAH MOVIE" if you were wondering.

EDIT: Ah, shoot, I forgot to add "TORAH SWINDLING A YOUNG DISABLED MAN OUT OF HIS MONEY TORAH". Ah, well. Perhaps next time.

 

[lamp]

In a different thread, @xtamarlover validated the claim that Melinda and Marshall moved in together after only about 3 months. Why would they not be living together now, unless Marshall’s probation officer/judge ruled that he’s not safe to be around kids.

 

[LoverofPi]

Personally, I'm disappointed in Linda. She said she had all our addresses and she still refuses to prove it.

@TamarYaelBatYah still waiting for you to prove your claim that you know where our houses are. I've even volunteered to confirm what parts of my address you get right as a show of good sportsmanship.

 

[Kosher Salt]

You're full of hot air. The FBI can tell him what to do. He was told in no small terms to leave me and my family alone.

You're a dummy. The LAW says that the FBI can put stipulations on people under investigation.

And yet here he is on the farms talking about you and your family. You're an idiot and a tard.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Personally, I'm disappointed in Linda. She said she had all our addresses and she still refuses to prove it.

@TamarYaelBatYah still waiting for you to prove your claim that you know where our houses are. I've even volunteered to confirm what parts of my address you get right as a show of good sportsmanship.

It's been like half a week, safe to say she hasn't got shit lol

 

[Logical Fallacies]

I know what he was describing and it IS victim blaming and HORSESHIT. It's a popular theory but incorrect.

First of all, the nerve you have to cry about victim blaming. You've been victim blaming all over the place when we were discussing Marshal's Ex. You're absolutely shameless. SHAMELESS.

Also, no one here said it was the person's fault for getting abused. It absolutely isn't. Victims of abuse tend to continue the circle of abuse by unconsciously choosing new abusers. Or they display certain traits (e.g. overlooking red flags, because they were conditioned to do that) which makes it easier for abusers to prey on them. That's not their fault, but it it's a fact that this happens. But you don't really care anyways unless you can use it to attack someone, so why explain this to you?

Also, if this is incorrect I request some proof. Or is it only incorrect because you don't like it?

Marrying for love is one theory of marriage. A theory I disagree with.

If you marry for love you can find yourself in a bad situation when you don't feel so good about your partner's choices. I married for PRINCIPLE... and then the love follows. I choose to love after a logical decision is made.

Arranged marriage based on principles, not feelings, lasts a lot longer. My marriage with Marshall was based on a Shidduch style process (arranged marriage in a way) and then I chose to open my heart to him/ love him.

He's my Boaz and I'm his Ruth.

You know, maybe if you had chosen a man who loved and respected you from the very beginning, he'd not abuse you, Melinda.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

You're a dummy. The LAW says that the FBI can put stipulations on people under investigation.



No, it doesn't matter... in the sense that I don't look for acceptance or validation from pagans.

I speak when I see an opportunity for theological, philosophical or academic debate.

I also speak in defense of my husband and myself at times. Just like The Messiah argued back in his defense and in defense of The Sheep. The Messiah argued with his accusers all the time. He argued with people about The Torah too.

When I speak in defense of myself or my husband it's NOT because I care what anyone thinks of us. It's because it all ultimately goes back to The Torah.

It's also because I enjoy watching your accusations against us fall short of the target of The Torah. You all try so hard to accuse us of sin but keep failing to PROVE IT using the very book that defines what sin is (The Torah).

You're a reetard. The Govt cannot impinge the 1st Amendment rights of anyone, not even prisoners. He can talk to others about you as much as he wants barring threats. You're a sad joke. If it's true, post the order. everyone knows you're full of shit. Even you know it.

As for your torah, it means nothing to anyone except zealots and crazies. It's literally only good for toilet paper.or kindling. Same with the Bible and the koran. The torah does not define morality, the Law of the land does.Also, it doesn't exempt you from the Law of the Land. I hope you find that out sooner than later, and with a short, sharp shock.

 

[murgatroid]

So new nuggets of information Linda let slip:

Marshal spent 4 years in prison. Yeesh.

She was in foster homes. Which implies abuse or neglect, or her parents and extended family not being there or being able to take care of her for some reason.

I'm such a tard, I just realized the torah is Linda's fetish. It all makes sense now.

 

[redcent]

Where did I say I never made a mistake about anything?
No, what I said was in context of relationship break ups and choosing potential life partners, which is way your accusations were about. You're trying to take my statements out of context of the topic



I know what he was describing and it IS victim blaming and HORSESHIT. It's a popular theory but incorrect.



I didn't answer your question about our separate houses because it was already answered on the thread and I didn't feel like repeating myself. It's not the reasons you stated.

Go find the answer in the thread. If you can't find it I'll consider repeating it.

My dad never had any sexual relationship with me at all. He never tried any such thing. He was a state cyclist champion and he passed on to me his knowledge and passion for cycling. I have some fond memories of us cycling together.

My mom wasn't the character you described either.

My upbringing was a blessing because it led me to The Torah. I saw from an early age the evils of humanity (even in the foster families that posed as the "good" people) and my rejection of what I saw brought me to Elohim. I was neglected enough to choose my own path instead of having parents trying to lead me to false elohims. Many people have to choose between The Torah and conflict with their parents. I had no such barriers to coming to The Torah

interesting. What particular evil did you see that was so bad that lead you to the torah?

Am I supposed to take these statements and questions seriously?

You don't have to, but you seem to take everything else so seriously.

You can answer by learning to laugh like everyone else (and not the haughty "ha ha I got you" smug laugh) or be a serious. Whatevs.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

You're a dummy. The LAW says that the FBI can put stipulations on people under investigation.



No, it doesn't matter... in the sense that I don't look for acceptance or validation from pagans.

I speak when I see an opportunity for theological, philosophical or academic debate.

I also speak in defense of my husband and myself at times. Just like The Messiah argued back in his defense and in defense of The Sheep. The Messiah argued with his accusers all the time. He argued with people about The Torah too.

When I speak in defense of myself or my husband it's NOT because I care what anyone thinks of us. It's because it all ultimately goes back to The Torah.

It's also because I enjoy watching your accusations against us fall short of the target of The Torah. You all try so hard to accuse us of sin but keep failing to PROVE IT using the very book that defines what sin is (The Torah).

Thing is though you can't debate worth shit. it's probably because of your poor upbringing and the shitty schools you went to. Also, since you don't actually read the Hebrew Bible you are a pagan. After all, you still refuse to read the Tanakh. All you know is the word "Torah" because it's easy to spell. Hell, you think Jesus is the Messiah. No real J ew thinks that. Face it, you're just another pagan because your beliefs fall flat against real j ews .

 

[LoverofPi]

It's been like half a week, safe to say she hasn't got shit lol

I mean, I know that, you know that, and deep down Linda knows that, but it's still worth reminding her from time to time that we do all know how full of shit she is.

ETA: Neg rate all you like, Linda, we both know that means you're mad that I'm right.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Oh look, she got rating perms back.
We all know she's gonna get 'em taken away again, but I wanna bet on when. My guess is Tuesday

 

[SS Reichsmarshall]

@TamarYaelBatYah Do you know what COINTELPRO is/was?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Melinda, not everyone is religious. If they are, not everyone uses the Torah to guide them.

You use the Torah to seek and define your morals, I use everyday life to discover mine.

The things you’ve said regarding Marshall and your kids and other women in your life go against our morals. It doesn’t have to be a sin to be wrong, just look at the Bible and how it stated that women were only a man’s property.
The Torah states that spousal rape and stalking are not sins, but it’s still legally wrong and (to most people) morally wrong.
You’re a subject of this too, stalking isn’t defined as a sin in the Torah, but you still knew it was wrong and you reported it.

If The Torah doesn't say it's not a "sin", it isn't wrong.

The Torah (and by extension, "The Bible") does NOT say women are property

https://www.academia.edu/40552146/Is_Woman_an_Object_in_The_Torah_A_Rebuttal_to_Ken_Stone

Stalking is a sin in The Torah. But I'm not debating that publicly. Doing so would require me to expose secret knowledge. Not doing that.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

If The Torah doesn't say it's not a "sin", it isn't wrong.

The Torah (and by extension, "The Bible") does NOT say women are property

https://www.academia.edu/40552146/Is_Woman_an_Object_in_The_Torah_A_Rebuttal_to_Ken_Stone

Stalking is a sin in The Torah. But I'm not debating that publicly. Doing so would require me to expose secret knowledge. Not doing that.

The Torah isn't secret knowledge

 

[Karl der Grosse]

I gotta hand it to you, this "secret knowledge" shit is the best thing you've pulled since you started all that netzarim bullshit. You refused to show your sources for that as well, IIRC.

 

[lamp]

If The Torah doesn't say it's not a "sin", it isn't wrong.

The Torah (and by extension, "The Bible") does NOT say women are property

https://www.academia.edu/40552146/Is_Woman_an_Object_in_The_Torah_A_Rebuttal_to_Ken_Stone

Stalking is a sin in The Torah. But I'm not debating that publicly. Doing so would require me to expose secret knowledge. Not doing that.

Citing your own article isn’t proof. It’s an opinion piece, not a factual one.

Women are objects in the Bible

Also, a real Torah follower has informed us that it is, in fact, not a sin.

Our Laws are not based on the Torah. We have separation of church and state as well as the first Amendment for a reason, Melinda. I do not, nor will I ever, follow the Torah, so therefore you cannot tell me what I am or am not doing is a sin.

 

[redcent]

Hey Linda, you said you married marshal in an originally loveless marriage on principle. What principle is that? Were you scared to be single because the torah told you to be married? Is that the only reason?