Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

[6thRanger]

Today's the day boys and girls. For our local legal scholars, what do we want to see in the filing for it to qualify as excellent?

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

Today's the day boys and girls. For our local legal scholars, what do we want to see in the filing for it to qualify as excellent?

IANAL, but I'm looking for it not being like what happened with the 2nd amended petition.

So yeah, the barest minimum expectations at the moment.

 

[diskboomer]

Today's the day boys and girls. For our local legal scholars, what do we want to see in the filing for it to qualify as excellent?

It not being late for one.

 

[Laundui_or_douchette?]

I look forward to waking up and having some nice juicy, completely boring and logical documents to read.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

You can tell there's about to be motion in the lawsuit, the speds have come back to play.

Today is the deadline for Vic's appeal brief.
It'd be pretty fucking embarrassing if it were late.

 

[diskboomer]

Today is the deadline for Vic's appeal brief.
It'd be pretty fucking embarrassing if it were late.

I hope it’s on time so we have something to read through tomorrow

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Todays the day, the day of happenings, and then we wait for like 3 months.

 

[diskboomer]

Todays the day, the day of happenings, and then we wait for like 3 months.

Nah! We still get the responses from Lemon, Kermit, and Johnson

 

[DuckzillA]

Nah! We still get the responses from Lemon, Kermit, and Johnson

Or get another notice that they haven't been paid so they didn't respond...

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

Todays the day, the day of happenings, and then we wait for like 3 months.

There's also Friday - that's the deadline for MoRon's (already late) cross appeal brief.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say it won't be filed - they're already 280k in the hole, and will have to pay to contest Vic's appeal.
If they were to pursue their own appeal on top of that, they'll soon find themselves in worse financial shape than Douchette.

 

[Monkey Prick]

If they're late and gay on this or have more (((technical issues))) then they deserve to be shit on as much as opposing counsel.

Hoping they hit a home run on this, this should by all logic be a mostly successful appeal.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I hope it’s on time so we have something to read through tomorrow

Unless Martinez Hsu waits until the very last minute to file it, Nick has already said he's going to be reading it tonight. It'll probably be continued tomorrow night also; he doesn't expect to get through it in one night.

 

[Dr. Geronimo]

I'm going full wildcard and saying that they're going to request another extension.

 

[Iron Hamster]

No matter what, there will be sperging today.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Here's what I would like to see:

• Filed before 10pm CST
• Addresses the areas Chupp dropped the ball -
  • Mishandling of TCPA process
  • Mishandling / lack of clarity on what was added to the record
  • And more!
• Highlights why all amended submissions should be allowed
• Affirmatively states why TCPA does not apply to all 4 parties
• Any other appeal wordsmithing required

 

[mindlessobserver]

They really need to hammer how Chupp set a ridiculously high bar for the evidence required and they need to point out that they could not meet Chupps evidentiary requirement because the defendants didnt comply with Discovery and the TCPA itself prevents the evidence Chupp wanted from being collected

 

[Fox Fucker]

Assuming they do upload the brief on time, will it be available ASAP or would there be some "verification/validation" time where it gets uploaded somewhere first and then gets moved to one of the public records websites for all to see? I know Nick said he'd read it if the brief was filed, but I assumed that's because he'd get a copy from Ty Beard.

 

[LuNaS]

They really need to hammer how Chupp set a ridiculously high bar for the evidence required and they need to point out that they could not meet Chupps evidentiary requirement because the defendants didnt comply with Discovery and the TCPA itself prevents the evidence Chupp wanted from being collected

Agreed, this for me was the most egregious thing, "ok you have sufficient evidence of one case of TI, do you have more? No? Then I'm going to dismiss the charge because it's just one case so it doesn't really make it that bad."

That honestly was one of Chupp biggest fuck ups the other was playing kicking the can instead of bucking up and saying I fucked up so I'm going to reconsider this and these charges are back in.

 

[HighwayStar]

They really need to hammer how Chupp set a ridiculously high bar for the evidence required and they need to point out that they could not meet Chupps evidentiary requirement because the defendants didnt comply with Discovery and the TCPA itself prevents the evidence Chupp wanted from being collected

Exactly this. They can’t only be punctual with the deadline, but punctual with why Chupp’s handling of the TCPA was wrong and why they have a strong case. They have the past few weeks to get this brief right and file it on time, so there’s no excuse. And please for the love of God, don’t file this in the very last minute like you did back in late August.

 

[774]

Nah! We still get the responses from Lemon, Kermit, and Johnson

Maybe (just like we'll maybe get their cross-appeal brief), but the question is, when? They might be granted an extension (or two?) as well, so it might be a while.