Left-wing activists burn car of Gunnar Schupelius

translated from the German:

The car of Berliner Zeitung journalist Gunnar Schupelius, which was burnt to the ground in Wilmersdorf Tuesday night, was allegedly set on fire by left-wing activists. They claimed responsibility on the German version of the Indymedia website subsequent to the attack.

In the letter, a 'Princess Latte' stated that the attack on Schupelius was prompted because his writing "gives cues to racist, right, and reactionary thought". It ends with a reference to "feminist autonomous cells". This grouping had previously claimed responsibility for an attack on a vehicle in front of a Freikirche (in German context, generally an evangelical, actually Christian church) in Tübingen.

According to police, the fire was spotted by guests at a Berlin pub at about 2 o'clock the night before New Year's Eve. This is the second arson attack on Schupelius's vehicles- a car he owned having previously been set on fire in 2014.

District mayor of Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf, Reinhard Naumann (SPD), said on Thursday that the secret police (Staatsschutz) will investigate the claim of responsibility for the attack. "If the attack is confirmed to have been performed by a left-wing extremist, as stated in the manifesto, as in the case of right-wing or radical religiously motivated extremism, the state's monopoly on violence must remain sancrosanct." Naumann stated Schupelius and his family had the full solidarity of the district office (a sub-city division of government in large German cities like Berlin).

Chairman of the German Journalist's Association, Frank Überall, also condemned the attack, writing that it was "a disgusting attack on the freedom of the press" on Twitter.

Article (archive)

This is a pretty funny occurrence. Schupelius is an extremely milquetoast libertarian type who has condemned the center-right AfD party for its move to appeal to German patriotism, so either Princess Latte of the Feminist Autonomous Cells is targeting totally irrelevant morons, or this guy burnt his car himself for attention.
 
"Activists." This is the tactic of terrorists, not "activists."
Its weird reading articles like these while paying attention to the word selection. If it had been a right wing group attacking a left wing journalist would they be labeled terrorists or simply be activists?
They're not really left-wing either. Just functionaries of the fake-left part of the system.
Does the site they posted on typically have postings like this or is this not a normal occurrence?
 
Does the site they posted on typically have postings like this or is this not a normal occurrence?
Indymedia, especially the German site, is regularly used by Zionist antifa terrorists to make posts about their attacks on German national forces, etc. The police may actually look into this one, because Schupelius is really very anti-German, just from the fake-right point of view.
 
I imagine a large part of German left wing twitter are now trying to explain how journlists don't count when they aren't marxists.
 
What does this achieve for the terrorists? Absolutely nothing but a spotlight pointed straight into their eyes, and if Gunnar is indeed doing this for attention, then he really shot himself in the foot. Will we find out if this was TRUE and HONEST terrorism or a gayop? Probably, though I'd wait a bit.
 
"If the attack is confirmed to have been performed by a left-wing extremist, as stated in the manifesto, as in the case of right-wing or radical religiously motivated extremism, the state's monopoly on violence must remain sancrosanct."

Does that sound as bad in German as it does in English?
 
"If the attack is confirmed to have been performed by a left-wing extremist, as stated in the manifesto, as in the case of right-wing or radical religiously motivated extremism, the state's monopoly on violence must remain sancrosanct."

Does that sound as bad in German as it does in English?
I probably could have conveyed the meaning a bit better. It is implied in the comment by the mayor that individual political violence is unacceptable and it is reserved to the state. So yes.. very German.
 
Will we ever catch the notorious terrorist known as Princess Latte?

Kids, when you start taking your streetname cues from anime, it's time to stop and think about whether you're really the type who needs a streetname.
 
Burning down Cars is very common in germany. there are Cars burning in Berlin almost everyday as part of anti Gentrification activism.
 
"If the attack is confirmed to have been performed by a left-wing extremist, as stated in the manifesto, as in the case of right-wing or radical religiously motivated extremism, the state's monopoly on violence must remain sancrosanct."

Does that sound as bad in German as it does in English?
This is related to a reasonably well-known doctrine of politics, made more famous by a German named Max Weber. As he put it
A state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.
This is related to acceptance by people - the fact that the group of people known as "the government" can commit violence, and the general populace accepts that violence, is what makes a state possible. This is why vigilantism is treated harshly - it's a direct competitive claim to the state's right to exist.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo