Son of Sparda 84
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 23 de Feb, 2019
Thats nice and all but do y'all have some of that Sanctions and Fees Transcript
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Iniciador del tema 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2019
Basically."Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction" means that Lemonfurher was literally trying to convince the Court of Appeals that they didn't have the ability to hear a TCPA case or something equally fucking, right? Or does it have some other meaning?
Not completely retarded though. The whole quibble about final orders was part of it. If there was no final ruling, the appeals court would not have jurisdiction, n for example.
A_throwaway_name62919
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Jun, 2019
Vic's lawyers filed the appeal when they did to meet a vaguely worded deadline for appeal that the countdown for it could arguably start from when Chupp dismissed the causes of action under the TCPA, or could arguably start from when he made his ruling on what the fees would be. As I recall the idea LeMosquitoed was attempting to argue was that as the "final ruling" on the fees had not yet been made, the appeals court wouldn't have jurisdiction yet, and thus they should dismiss the initial appeal filing as being too soon. His obvious hope being that they'd dismiss the appeal, at which point - after Chupp ruled on fees - LeMosquitoed would switch to arguing that Vic was filing for appeal too late and could only appeal the fees at most. Chupp wasn't having any of that shit, and as this order shows, neither is the Court of Appeals."Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction" means that Lemonfurher was literally trying to convince the Court of Appeals that they didn't have the ability to hear a TCPA case or something equally fucking
So yeah, Lemonfurher was attempting to trick the court into preventing Vic from appealing via technicalities, and has been told no by the court.
- Registrado
- 11 de Sep, 2019
Gotta give it to lemonpledge that plan, though scummy, was quite ingenious. Too bad the court saw through it and it might now come to bite him in the ass.
- Registrado
- 6 de Jun, 2019
Try too hard to hide something and it becomes very evident that something is amiss. The court of appeals judges might just care to take their time reviewing everything very, very thoroughly.
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2019
Where can the document be found (re:SearchTX doesn't have it, yet)?
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2019
It's almost as if Vic has a strong case, and if a jury actually looks at the merits it could be bad for them.
- Registrado
- 21 de Mar, 2019
And that could lead to some evidence of malpractice, out of the three, Lemon Fürher is the one that's most at risk and has the clients that are the biggest targets so he got the most to lose.
biteXsized
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 19 de Abr, 2019
Sorry guys for not mentioning it. I got it directly from the CoA's website. But because the PDF is free and there's literally nothing more to see in there, I saw no purpose in uploading it to the Farms. I'll edit my post above.
- Registrado
- 10 de Nov, 2015
Wouldnt they have inserted themselves in the controversy?
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2019
Inserted himself with the intent to sway the outcome of a public controversy, yes.
Probably the only thing he's inserted himself into in a long time.
I'm like a pokemaster, but with court documents. Gotta catch 'em all. Thanks.
- Registrado
- 18 de Mar, 2019
The funny part is it's an autistic child's plan. Lemonaids thought his 2 step plan, with a "surprise twist" of a 3rd step, was going to work--every functioning adult knew what he was doing. It was why Martinez hammered out the point the last time he was before the judge.
Laundui_or_douchette?
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 19 de Jul, 2019
Lemoiney was going to file a motion to dismiss regardless of when they filed the appeal notice.
1. Ty files the appeal notice immediately. Leonine appeals because it was to early.
2. Ty waits until the fees were decided. Lemoine files motion to dismiss due to late filing.
It was always going to happen, so Ty went early for the lesser risk.
1. Ty files the appeal notice immediately. Leonine appeals because it was to early.
2. Ty waits until the fees were decided. Lemoine files motion to dismiss due to late filing.
It was always going to happen, so Ty went early for the lesser risk.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
"Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction" means that Lemonfurher was literally trying to convince the Court of Appeals that they didn't have the ability to hear a TCPA case or something equally fucking
He was technically actually right, at least when he filed it. It was still an absolutely pointless exercise in futility, where he filed this bullshit motion, doing absolutely no good for his clients, in the hope of somehow billing for it later. He's such an utter turd that even when he does something meritorious he's still an absolute piece of shit about it.
And here it ended up, DENIED without any legal reasoning, because it was obviously moot before the appeals court even looked at it.
The argument was essentially that the TCPA statute clearly enables interlocutory appeals when the defendant loses, and the fact that it doesn't explicitly do this for when the plaintiff loses means that was intentional, i.e. the appeals court has no jurisdiction until a final judgment has been issued. Chupp specifically didn't do that until the fees ruling, and when he did issue a final judgment, made it very clear that's what he was doing, his first competent action in the case.
- Registrado
- 11 de Sep, 2019
Wish we could get the transcript, because I was sure it was mentioned that Chupp was very clear and specific that he wanted to make sure the court recognized vic had the right to appeal when lemonboy was pulling some stunts..
- Registrado
- 5 de Ago, 2019
Lemoine Gayboy's A Series of Unfortunate Appeals
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
I like that the appeals court officially denied it. Supposedly they have to do that but I was suspecting they might just ignore his dumb motion. Lemongasp is the exact kind of dumbass who would somehow figure out a way to engage in frivolous motion practice even on an appeal.
- Registrado
- 22 de Jul, 2016
So what is Greggykins going on and on about the Appeal being worded improperly in regards to the sanctions and fees? That because they hadn't been determined when the appeal was filed they couldn't be appealed? And if course this means the appeal is DOOMED and Vic still owes EVERYTHING blah blah blah?
- Registrado
- 10 de Nov, 2015
You notice how the person who does the transcripts is late and at the same time we dont hear a peep out of Lemoine?