- Registrado
- 25 de Dic, 2017
The whole movie isn't really about a rich vs poor narrative where Arthur Fleck himself isn't political at all as he states clearly in his interview. Arthur spells out how he sees nothing but ugly and bad people everywhere and in the context of the film they come from all walks of life from the richest of rich with Thomas Wayne to the poor with the kids who beat him down to chasing down the sign and the case worker who seems to be going through the motions of therapy. Everyone in this film for the most part are either aloof assholes or violent assholes where the rioters are less looking to ways to improve conditions in the city as they are going to want to pillage and destroy and the rich don't seem to care their own city is decaying or are dismissive of the bottom rung.
I think the way the riots that were handled in this film were very mature and it is disturbing where as Arthur is being taken away and he gets to view Gotham on fire and destroyed, he starts to laugh at the great joke that is society and you see the horror on the police officer's face who seem to just trying to get by as they do their job and see that the chaos is near unstoppable.
This is similar to the plot of The Dark Knight. Most of the Joker's tantrums are about how chaos is good and how people are inherent bad and don't care about others. Batman tells him, at the end, that he's wrong because people proved to be good or, at least, not bad. This is a Joker movie, and I guess (I havent' yet watched it aaaaaaaaah!!) it's meant to give you a sense of despair and chaos because it lacks the hope and order feeling that is Batman and that will later arrive. I kinda like that because in other iterations, they made it look like Batman created the Joker. Here, Joker created Batman. Work either way, imo as they're complement.