📚 Megathread Yaniv in the News


20190731_Rip4nutmegvmckinnon.jpg
 
Tim Pool put up another video about Yaniv's BCHRT cases, fencepost still firmly inserted into his arse. The comments section is mostly people pointing out that Yaniv is a predator etc. rather than comments about the video.
Trans Ball Waxing Scandal Is Waking Up The Left On Gender Issues.mp4

The Globe and Mail is defending Yaniv. Lmao


Ver archivo adjunto 869193
probably worth noting this is authored by Canaduh's NDP BC VP @MorganeOgerBC who previously supported the fellow troon, and then denouced, causing a social media cattyness between the two (as seen in Yaniv social media posts) . This whole piece appears to be an attempt to humble brag about getting a Vancouver rape crisis center defunded.
her post decrying Yaniv
 
Última edición:
Uhhhh you did see that Ogre wrote that and it's an opinion piece right? The fucker is just trying to backpedal to regain some of those tranny votes
Oger's entire post is a contradiction, you can't say in one breath that trans need to be accommodated and then in the next breath say but not at the cost of business or whatever. There is no "grey area" to Oger and Yaniv, you either do it or you're transphobic, that's been proven many times in these threads.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 869101
I wonder if those recordings even exist? Even so constantly harassing a business will probably get the police called on you.
Also the irony of using screenshots as proof while saying the pedo DMs are "photo shopped"
I'm sure the recording exist. There are a few known incidents where he harassed a place of business and they eventually had to get aggressive with him like that. I remember some pizza place and the first salon he sued, Mint Tanning salon.
 
Pink News article.
Do you think they covered the pedo shit?

Girlpenis news is deep into troon ideology. They would never ever mention that Jonathan Jessica Yaniv is a pedophile
 
Oger's entire post is a contradiction, you can't say in one breath that trans need to be accommodated and then in the next breath say but not at the cost of business or whatever. There is no "grey area" to Oger and Yaniv, you either do it or you're transphobic, that's been proven many times in these threads.

Well in this case, Oger's publicly said that he withdraw support for JY's human rights complaints after discovering that many of the women were immigranats who worked at home and had young children, which he defines as an "undue hardship." So, then, what isn't? If a childless woman advertises this service out of her home because she won't wax JY? How about someone who does work contract at a salon and has kids, is that actionable discrimination? How about if someone's a native Canadian, white, is an atheist? How about if they themselves are male?

I mean, the answer is obvious. No one should have to handle another's genitals for a non-medical, non-essential vanity-driven procedure that most people don't engage in.
 
Well in this case, Oger's publicly said that he withdraw support for JY's human rights complaints after discovering that many of the women were immigranats who worked at home and had young children, which he defines as an "undue hardship." So, then, what isn't? If a childless woman advertises this service out of her home because she won't wax JY? How about someone who does work contract at a salon and has kids, is that actionable discrimination? How about if someone's a native Canadian, white, is an atheist? How about if they themselves are male?

I mean, the answer is obvious. No one should have to handle another's genitals for a non-medical, non-essential vanity-driven procedure that most people don't engage in.
I’m annoyed most that Oger says it’s fine to target a “corporation” for this type of case, how did those corporations start? Oh, by hard working people. There’s zero goddamn excuse to tell someone to touch your dick if they say no.
 
I’m annoyed most that Oger says it’s fine to target a “corporation” for this type of case, how did those corporations start? Oh, by hard working people. There’s zero goddamn excuse to tell someone to touch your dick if they say no.

He's right that it would be a more sellable case. This is so obviously and brazenly grotesque and disgusting that it has caused an immense worldwide backlash against troonery in general. The Rogaine Ogre also wants to force unwilling women into contact with male genitals, that is, he approves of government enforced sexual assault. He just wants a more palatable test case.
 
He's right that it would be a more sellable case. This is so obviously and brazenly grotesque and disgusting that it has caused an immense worldwide backlash against troonery in general. The Rogaine Ogre also wants to force unwilling women into contact with male genitals, that is, he approves of government enforced sexual assault. He just wants a more palatable test case.
Oh I fucking hope so.

Fuck these assholes and their enablers.
 

Corbella: Jessica Yaniv growing bolder in her bid to have her male genitals waxed

LICIA CORBELLA
Updated: August 1, 2019
If the international controversy and media storm swirling around Jessica Yaniv is unsettling her, she does a great job of hiding it.

The now infamous transgender woman, who has taken 16 estheticians to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for refusing to wax her male genitals, seems to be enjoying the notoriety and media interview requests streaming in from as far away as Israel and particularly from the U.K., where some of the tweets following news reports are fond of using the British term “bollocks” in every sense of that word.

Reached via telephone at her Walnut Grove home near the Vancouver suburb of Surrey, Yaniv says she is just as determined as ever “to cement the rights of trans people” as she was when she started this controversial fight.

“There’s a lot of interest in me right now,” said Yaniv, 32, who has had numerous racist comments made by her exposed online.

When asked why she didn’t just go to businesses that performed Brazilian waxes for male genitalia, she rejected the fact that special training is necessary.

Yaniv says she received a Brazilian wax at the Merle Norman salon in Langley but was denied that same service at the Merle Norman salon in Burnaby. She ended up filing a human rights complaint against the Burnaby salon — which has since shut down.

Did that business close because of her complaint?

“I really believe it did,” she boasted. She said another hair salon had to close because of her complaints, as did a home-based business.

Doesn’t she feel badly for those women who lost their jobs and their businesses because of her?

“No, why should I feel bad?” she said. “The one who was the victim here was me. The way that I see it, all women should receive the same service.”

And therein lies the problem. While Yaniv self-identifies as a woman, do people who provide intimate services have to accept a client’s self identification if their genitals are not changed and those services involve one’s private parts? It’s one thing to use someone’s preferred personal pronouns. It’s quite another thing to be forced to wax their testicles.

“People who invoke fundamental human rights like freedom of belief and religion cannot cherry pick which rights they want, depending on their preferences,” continued Yaniv.

So, is it a human right to have your privates waxed by women who don’t want to wax your privates?

Yaniv wouldn’t answer that question directly. “Some of these places started turning me down for facials once they learned I was trans,” she said. If that’s true, that would be wrong for a public salon, but I think we can all agree that being forced to handle someone’s testicles is quite different from touching their face.

Also, aside from this case and any issues involving gender diversity, just imagine the danger women could be exposed to if the tribunal says women with these types of home-based businesses must accept anyone who asks for intimate services into their homes. We have cases of men murdering women real-estate agents, for heaven’s sake, who were working alone showing houses for sale. Will women be forced to risk their own safety?

As far as this case goes, Calgary lawyer Jay Cameron — who is representing five of the 16 female respondents — says some of these women work from home and they don’t want to perform intimate services on individuals with male genitalia in their homes. That should be their right.

Cameron — who works for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms and is representing these women pro bono before the quasi-judicial kangaroo court that our human rights commissions have turned into — says many of these women don’t know how to wax male genitalia, they don’t have the specialized equipment to do so and, what’s more, they don’t want to.

During the multi-day hearing in Vancouver, Cameron called Angie Barnetson, the owner of Manscape Spa in Victoria, as an expert witness on July 4, to testify about how difficult it is to wax male genitals.

Barnetson, who also teaches esthetics at a Victoria college, rejected Yaniv’s claim Wednesday that waxing men’s genitals is no more difficult than waxing women’s.

“Yaniv is very misinformed,” said Barnetson, who was accepted as an expert by the tribunal.

Performing a Brazilian wax on a man is “much trickier and more time consuming. It’s kind of like comparing a gynecologist and a urologist — apples and oranges,” said Barnetson, who was reached Wednesday evening.

Cameron says many of the women respondents are impoverished, recent immigrants of colour and they are petrified by this process.

Yaniv, who has said racist things online, was asked if she is a racist and if she is targeting visible minorities with her complaints as a result.

She did not answer the question directly. When asked why she used offensive terms to describe some minority groups — or why she said online that she “hates” certain groups — she justified those comments because of the discrimination she has suffered from “those people,” after they stared at her or refused to perform a service on her.

The media storm around Jessica Yaniv is not weakening her. It’s bolstering her. Here’s hoping the ruling, expected later this year, will humble her.

Licia Corbella is a Postmedia opinion columnist. lcorbella@postmedia.com
 
Denying him facials or other non ball waxing services is actually well within the rights (human and business) of any business now.

For one thing, his racism is blatant and everyone knows it now, so a salon run by Sikh women would absolutely not want to service him in any way.

And for another, he is known to complain and just make up shit because of his troon shield. So it is well within the realm of possibility that he gets serviced but still finds some bullshit to complain about. Anyone who welcomes him into their business is now risking their business. This is a fact based on his past and current behavior.

It all comes down to self preservation and self respect. Servicing a disgusting man who has shit on your people and your religion and your gender, will not sit well with anyone.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo