Culture Google may be left out of SF Pride celebration - I suppose one good thing had to come of this Maza dude

Google may not to get their annual virtue signal LARP on this year. Article wastes very little time pointing to Maza as a prime factor and he just so happens to live here in SF as well.

Last night, LGBTQ+ activists and former Google employees attended an overflowing San Francisco Pride Board meeting to lobby for the exclusion of Google from this year's Pride parade and celebration.

Google has faced media backlash after journalist Carlos Maza, who is gay, accused the company of enabling homophobic harassment on its YouTube video platform.

Earlier this week, Maza, who produces the Vox video series "Strikethrough," opened up on Twitter about a yearlong harassment campaign he's faced from right-wing YouTube star Steven Crowder.

Maza says that Crowder, who has amassed over 3.8 million followers on YouTube, has called him a "lispy queer," "a little queer," and a "gay Mexican." Crowder sells T-shirts bearing Maza's face and the slogan "Socialism is for F-gs," which he's advertised on his YouTube channel.
Maza reported the harassment to YouTube, arguing that it violated a provision in the company's terms of service that bars hate speech.

On Tuesday, YouTube responded to Maza on Twitter, saying that Crowder's content did not violate its terms of service. After public outcry, the company agreed to withhold ad revenue from Crowder's channel until he removed the link to his T-shirt sales website from his video descriptions.
At yesterday's Pride Board meeting, activists expressed concerns that allowing Google to participate in this year's festivities would be seen as an endorsement of YouTube's actions.

"This feels like a classic example of 'rainbow-washing,'" said activist and former Google employee Tyler Bresaicher. [Full disclosure: The author of this story was also previously employed by Google.]

"[Google] gets a lot of press for being progressive," said another former employee, who requested anonymity. "But even during Pride Month, this is how they behave."

Google did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

While the Pride Board does have the power to exclude organizations from Pride festivities, it's never exercised it in the past.

In 2015, the Board came close to barring Facebook from participating in Pride over the company's "real name" policy, which many transgender people found discriminatory. In a narrow 5-4 vote, the Pride Board allowed Facebook to continue to participate.

At this time, no decision has been made about Google's participation in the parade. The Pride Board's members, none of whom were serving at the time of the 2015 Facebook vote, said at last night's meeting that they intend to monitor the situation as it develops.

If the board were to take action to exclude Google from San Francisco's Pride festivities, Breisacher hopes it would get the company's attention.

"More and more, [digital profiles] are people's identities," he said. "This is especially true for queer people who don't have communities where they're from [...] You can't just tell people to 'block the trolls and ignore them.'"

An anonymous former employee said they hope that Google's exclusion from the parade could give more credibility to employees organizing for better conditions inside the company.

Last November, Google employees organized a walkout over the company's handling of sexual harassment. In April, a number of the walkout's organizers said they faced retaliation at work as a result, including demotions.

Update, 6/7, 11:26 a.m.: A spokesperson for San Francisco Pride says that Google has already registered as a contingent for the parade, and will remain a participant unless the Pride Board decides otherwise.

"We are monitoring this story as it develops, listening to the concerns of the community, and have raised these concerns with our contacts at Google," the representative said.
I'm willing to bet Maza will use this to get front and center as a feature of the parade and celebration.
If I weren't so adverse to the degeneracy that occurs in SFs parade every year (and for the love of god *don't* google 'Folsom Street Fair' -you've been warned) I'd do a little recon and find out. See if perhaps milkshakes look as wasteful on gay mexicans as it does on politicians.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I don't understand why google (or any large company) gives so much of a shit about the homo community. They are only like 4% of the population,
shouldn't they want to be as neutral as possible for most amount of customers? I mean presumably they want to make money right?

I think it's more about signaling to straight customers who care about such things. Most people don't care much either way so there's not much to lose when corporations use the LGBT to virtue signal.

Something that annoys me is when every business hangs a rainbow flag in the window because, in my opinion, that should be a way to signal that the business is gay owned or is intended for a gay clientele (like a gay bar or bookstore). When Chase Manhattan Bank has a rainbow flag in its window, that symbol has lost most of its meaning.

Giant corporate entities at Pride always squicked me out, especially since their superficial wokeness doesn't always line up with their policies. Google can get fucked.

It's one thing when they're showcasing their LGBT employees, but Starbucks invites all of their employees at headquarters to participate, which seems like an asshole move to me honestly. No one cares if Barbara in HR doesn't hate gay people, but she is in the way of the drag queen float, so she can fuck off.
 
Something that annoys me is when every business hangs a rainbow flag in the window because, in my opinion, that should be a way to signal that the business is gay owned or is intended for a gay clientele (like a gay bar or bookstore). When Chase Manhattan Bank has a rainbow flag in its window, that symbol has lost most of its meaning.
You know that's not a bad idea. A similar thing was done in germany in the 1930's where they would put a star symbol to show which shops charged high interests rates.
 
I don't understand why google (or any large company) gives so much of a shit about the homo community. They are only like 4% of the population
The actual percentage is unknowable, but it's estimated to be somewhere between 2% and 10%, with most estimates leaning toward the latter. But part of it would be the SJW line of thinking where if you're not an active ally you're an active enemy, and so identity politics demands solidarity or they'll attempt a boycott. And if all it takes is a tweet and a rainbow flag background on an ad to satiate them, then why not. Customer-wise, they likely have realised such pandering no longer actively turns away enough of their potential users to matter. So if the virtue signaling costs barely anything and gets morons to keep advocating their products despite any other flaws they possess because wokeness, then it's just financial sense.

A better question might be why so many companies give a shit about the troon community, the estimates of which are somewhere between .01% to 0.5% of the population and most estimates leaning toward the former. But very gradually companies seem to be realising that troons aren't a good investment, cause more trouble than they're worth, and drive away many other customers while rarely being good consumers themselves. If/when they realise YouTube dislikes and negative hashtags are only worth paying attention to when coming from their actual customer base, they will (:optimistic: :optimistic:) eventually start accepting SJW REEEEEEing as an acceptable loss. Especially as a large amount of that fraction of customers who might be making a fuss are also too lazy/selfish to actually boycott a product when they say they will.

(Fun fact: current estimates of the number of psycho/sociopaths is around 2%, meaning that theoretically it would make better business sense to attempt to appeal to them than to troons. The only problem being there appears to be a not-insignificant overlap between the two populations.)
 
On a positive side for Google, they won't have to stay there when the pride parade is interrupted by BLM protestors like the one who happened in Toronto in 2017.
 
I'm going to guess this is an all extension of the San Francisco attitude toward "tech bros" and gentrification and how it's somehow wrong for a company to provide free work transportation while everyone else takes the bus.
 
Thank God Private Villa of Corrupted Crops, Foxconn, Equifax, The Weinstein Company and Raytheon will still be having floats though! 🏳️‍🌈

lel wordfilter 🤣
4huqjqcib8331.jpg
 
The fuck? Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are OG defense contracting companies. Basically solely profit off of the war
machine and yet all they need to do to look good to liberal faggots is to have a pride float? Seriously, the fuck!‽?
Says a lot about how easy it is to manipulate them huh? They probably think they stand with them in earnest feeling. Maybe the employees do but the company heads are more for war than peace and everyone knows it. There's no profit for them with peace.
 
Shadowbanning is for fags... they could go all out and ban him from the normie internet, and vox too just to make sure nobody else goes after their ad bux.

ban all Vox apps from their systems, delete their media account, make it impossible to google them, etc.
Maybe just even buy out Vox and destroy their servers? No one's going to miss them, Maza or whoever the fuck else works underneath him.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo