SteelPlatedHeart
Not-So-New Guy
Miembro del personal
True & Honest Fan
🎤 VTuber Warden 🎤
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 3 de Dic, 2013
Some good salt in the comments after this tweet.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Iniciador del tema Randall Fragg
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Miang
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Oct, 2018
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2016
But Chris Pratt is the Chris for people who enjoy life.
Star Lord > Thor or Cap, every day
- Registrado
- 8 de Mayo, 2013
I can't believe I forgot Chris Pratt
Yes, Star Lord > Thor > Cap. I think he'll forgive me though because he's a cool guy like that.Maybe he should try shutting up a little harder so the rest of us didn't have to hear him.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 20 de Jun, 2018
Jesus christ these people are morons. Trump has been trying to get the report released since before it existed, these fuckwads say he's not exonerated, but can't even say what he's supposed to be exonerated of.
If Donald Trump called up Putin on his personal phone and said "Hey Putie Pie, I need a favor. Would you please hack Hillary Clinton's unsecured e-mail server and give anything you find to that stupid website with the various leaks" (Sorry I forgot the name)
Even if that exact turn of events played out, is any of that illegal? That's what pisses me off about this so much, after 2 years and 35 million, I don't know what the fuck the illegal thing that's supposed to have been done even is.
If Donald Trump called up Putin on his personal phone and said "Hey Putie Pie, I need a favor. Would you please hack Hillary Clinton's unsecured e-mail server and give anything you find to that stupid website with the various leaks" (Sorry I forgot the name)
Even if that exact turn of events played out, is any of that illegal? That's what pisses me off about this so much, after 2 years and 35 million, I don't know what the fuck the illegal thing that's supposed to have been done even is.
- Registrado
- 26 de Oct, 2017
What he did was win an election. The question all along was how to make it illegal.
- Registrado
- 20 de Mayo, 2016
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2015
I'm surprised this person wasn't downvoted into oblivion. Pretty much sums it up.
I'm sure those who replied found some way to spend three paragraphs to avoid actually using the phrase "It's okay when we do it" while still expressing the sentiment.
- Registrado
- 19 de Mayo, 2018
I think we've all come to the conclusion that Marvel has two Chrises who are infinitely more awesome and attractive than the one who acts like a high and mighty dumbass over political opinions.I can't believe I forgot Chris Pratt
Maybe he should try shutting up a little harder so the rest of us didn't have to hear him.
- Registrado
- 26 de Oct, 2017
“Extreme measures are necessary to stop the evil of Orange Man, once we have defeated him and killed all his supporters this genie will be easily placed back in the bottle.”
- Registrado
- 7 de Ago, 2018
Matt Taibbi (one of the few people on the left who didn't go full on ripping hair out, smearing their own shits on the wall and drinking out of the toilet insane) has repeatedly explained this:
Basically the media tipped their hands early on in 2016 that they were down with a Trump Presidency because Trump was ratings and provided a HUGE boost to revenues and ratings.
But then as Trump got closer and closer to winning, the lunatic lefties started salting the earth and vowing horrific retribution to anyone who supported Trump in any way or who might have helped him become President. Faced with the lunatic left wanting to murder/destroy ANYONE that that they could accuse of having a hand in Trump's rise (and dealing with reporters who were blatantly breaking all known rules for how journalist were to operate, because "Trump was a threat that had to be stopped at any cost"), the media but especially the cable channels like CNN and MSNBC, came with a solution to let them have their cake and not be shot in the head by Antifas while eating it in public.
Basically, they went 100% all in on being anti-Trump. This let CNN and MSNBC continue to push Trump for ratings, while presenting all coverage with a shamelessly partisan, overt negative slant to it in order to keep the lunatic left at bay so they won't accuse the media of profiting off of Trump or "normalizing" Trump. Because they felt that the lunatic left might make up their stockholders and lynch them for making money off of Trump.
You can work from home (which is the line given by Ginsberg's people) but it's one of those things Supreme Court Justices tend to avoid because it draws unwarranted attention and speculation, if you call in sick and work exclusively from home for an extended period of time.
- Registrado
- 5 de Mar, 2018
He just said the Democrats will have to decide to keep defrauding the public with their "bullshit". Holy fuck, I love this timeline!
- Registrado
- 15 de Ene, 2019
- Registrado
- 12 de Ene, 2017
I just clicked the video and he's saying he's considering closing the "damn border" over something. Holy cow what am I missing here?
EDIT: NAFTA is going away soon? Please, Mr. President, do it!
- Registrado
- 27 de Nov, 2018
Triggered:
MSNBC producer, deleted the tweet and set account private over that.
CNN spinning in circles trying to fact check the speech. Their nitpick are predictably pathetic.
"While that may be try, here's why it's not."
They criticize the wall, claiming that it's not getting built, while leaving out Trumps announcement during the speech that in a couple weeks he'll give a live speech at, and tour of, newly constructed border wall.
Reading CNNs treasonous muck always feels so gross. People actually believe their sad spin?
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 23 de Ene, 2015
"Without evidence"
Seriously? You're just gonna' keep shamelessly trying to push that shit even now? Give it a fucking rest already, geeze.
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2015
Weird how they want to prosecute a dude and quite possibly his entire family and everyone he knows without evidence, but Trump can't tweet without sourcing it more thoroughly than the average history thesis.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ene, 2019
"That's true, but context is needed."
Even when he gets something right, they'll still get at him for it.
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2018
That line also applies to a lot of what the media says. A lot of what they shit out is "technically correct".