UN Key Greenland glacier growing again after shrinking for years, NASA study shows


“That was kind of a surprise."

March 25, 2019, 3:06 PM EDT
Image: Patches of bare land are seen at the Jakobshavn glacier in Greenland in 2016
By Associated Press

WASHINGTON — A major Greenland glacier that was one of the fastest shrinking ice and snow masses on Earth is growing again, a new NASA study finds.

The Jakobshavn glacier around 2012 was retreating about 1.8 miles and thinning nearly 130 feet annually. But it started growing again at about the same rate in the past two years, according to a study in Monday’s Nature Geoscience. Study authors and outside scientists think this is temporary.

“That was kind of a surprise. We kind of got used to a runaway system,” said Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland ice and climate scientist Jason Box. “The good news is that it’s a reminder that it’s not necessarily going that fast. But it is going.”

Box, who wasn’t part of the study, said Jakobshavn is “arguably the most important Greenland glacier because it discharges the most ice in the northern hemisphere. For all of Greenland, it is king.”

A natural cyclical cooling of North Atlantic waters likely caused the glacier to reverse course, said study lead author Ala Khazendar, a NASA glaciologist on the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) project. Khazendar and colleagues say this coincides with a flip of the North Atlantic Oscillation — a natural and temporary cooling and warming of parts of the ocean that is like a distant cousin to El Nino in the Pacific.

The water in Disko Bay, where Jakobshavn hits the ocean, is about 3.6 degrees cooler than a few years ago, study authors said.

While this is “good news” on a temporary basis, this is bad news on the long term because it tells scientists that ocean temperature is a bigger player in glacier retreats and advances than previously thought, said NASA climate scientist Josh Willis, a study co-author. Over the decades the water has been and will be warming from man-made climate change, he said, noting that about 90 percent of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases goes into the oceans.

“In the long run we’ll probably have to raise our predictions of sea level rise again,” Willis said.

Think of the ocean temperatures near Greenland like an escalator that’s rising slowly from global warming, Khazendar said. But the natural North Atlantic Oscillation sometimes is like jumping down a few steps or jumping up a few steps. The water can get cooler and have effects, but in the long run it is getting warmer and the melting will be worse, he said.

Four outside scientists said the study and results make sense.

University of Washington ice scientist Ian Joughin, who wasn’t part of the study and predicted such a change seven years ago, said it would be a “grave mistake” to interpret the latest data as contradicting climate change science.

What’s happening, Joughin said, is “to a large extent, a temporary blip. Downturns do occur in the stock market, but overall the long term trajectory is up. This is really the same thing.”

Want more stories about the environment?

High tides and sea rise make floods a part of life on the East Coast
These 7 expeditions could reveal some of Earth's biggest secrets
Climate change may be dissolving the ocean floor. Here's why we should be worried.
SIGN UP FOR THE MACH NEWSLETTER AND FOLLOW NBC NEWS MACH ON TWITTER, FACEBOOK, AND INSTAGRAM.
 
Maybe plague inc's "global warming" was more accurate then I thought ?
 
We're very surprised that a thing we expected turned out to be opposite. Here's 17 reasons why that's actually proof we're still right (you won't believe number 11!)

Now we have “no choice” but to import the third world so we can increase global warming and get back to projections of 100 hurricanes and having palm trees in the Yukon.
 
Well, this is good news in the short term. Sadly I can see it's going to be used as proof against climate change by the same people who go "If it's called global warming, then why'd it snow this year, huh?"
What's interesting is that you'll see the same people saying that we shouldn't look at discrete, local extreme weather as proof of a global tendency* doing exactly that when they see one event that fits their personal view.

*which is a very sane point of view, but only if you don't ignore the big picture when you don't like it.
 
?It's almost as if... "Climate Change" doesn't work in the same way that it's being sold to the general public.
It's almost as if it's being used as a political cudgel to beat people with.

It's almost as if they're getting paid by someone to say that Climate Change is happening. ?
 
It's almost like the weather patterns of the planet we live on are far too complex not only to understand, but nearly impossible to explain to anybody who hasn't studied it their entire life.

Really make you think...
?
 
Última edición:
Article dijo:
A natural cyclical cooling of North Atlantic waters likely caused the glacier to reverse course, said study lead author Ala Khazendar, a NASA glaciologist on the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) project.

Alright, you know damn well they picked the name just to have the goofy acronym.
 
The years 15, 16 and 17 totally weren’t three in a row the warmest ever. Greencucks btfo.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo