Rise of the Warrior Monk

Found this on National Review's website.


It's actually pretty interesting, and it reflects how I feel about the modern world on "those days" (I think we all have some of "those days"). But I thought it would be interesting to bring here.

Rise of the Warrior Monk
By CHRISTIAN CHENSVOLD

Men dissatisfied with society drop out of it -- but may discover something surprising about themselves in the process.
As social-justice ideology casts its unintegrated shadow over every aspect of public life, it’s no surprise not every man is eager to pledge his allegiance to the new orthodoxy. But nor is every old-soul malcontent willing to stand athwart the wrong side of history yelling stop at an online outrage mob.




Some are just saying to hell with it, and so the universal law of cause and effect has brought us the growing phenomenon of “men going their own way,” or mentally dropping out of society — particularly the mating game. Whether these men are middle-aged and embittered from divorce or lifelong rejection, or in the prime of life but prematurely disillusioned, these male dropouts share the view that contemporary society is soulless and effeminate, increasingly demonizing men for all of their natural instincts. They have been disillusioned by the new economics of the online-dating game. And they crow that what women demand for their sociopolitical advancement is often at odds with their biological imperatives: The average woman doesn’t want the average man, they suspect. She wants what her mating instincts have always wanted: the above-average man. That leaves many average and below men believing their prospect of finding a mate is a few notches above a miracle.
But there’s another universal law in play here: that every truth is but half-truth, one side of a two-sided coin. If the mainstream media constantly demonizes traditional masculinity, then pop culture counters with endless fodder for rupturing the unconscious fault lines of the male psyches and dislodging fossilized masculine archetypes. Such as the kind of man desirable to women but devoted to a higher calling. There are the wifeless wall guards in Game of Thrones and the chaste Templars of History Channel’s “Knightfall,” and then all the bold, free men in countless cinematic depictions of Arthurian legend, Greek battle, and the two world wars.


These heroes of the eras, as Alexander Dumas put it, “when life was life and men were men,” have all the requisite alpha-male qualities from strength to bravery and even rugged good looks. But their life is devoted to something higher than using their high status to procreate. That’s because the whole notion of sex as the primary preoccupation of a man’s energies is but a recent blip on the timeline of evolution, a product of the 1970s, as it was only then — thanks to birth control and the Sexual Revolution — that it was made possible for men to ape the exploits of Jacques Casanova. In the heroic annals of history, manhood was not formed by languishing in perfumed sheets, but was forged like a sword by other men. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Mercutio tries to set lovestruck Romeo’s priorities straight when he essentially says: “Why are you so into this woman when you could be practicing your fencing?”
So what are today’s lone wolves doing when they “go their own way”? Many are gathering around online channels devoted to weightlifting and martial arts on the one hand, and spiritual matters on the other. And in doing so they are reviving a long-lost archetype, the warrior monk.




Surrounded by the shopping-and-social-justice zombie apocalypse in real life, warrior-monks huddle around YouTube channels that discourse on weightlifting (now considered by the Left a major right-wing red flag), kickboxing, and the collapse of Western Civilization — often all in a single five-minute video. There are self-published (obviously) books encouraging men to view American society as a decadent empire to be pillaged like a barbarian. Picture a cross, with the short end running parallel to the earth along the socio-political plane, and the long end running hierarchical on a psychological-spiritual axis, starting from a pair of dumbbells on a gym floor and running up through Jordan Peterson and Carl Jung straight up to God.
 
This is fucking fascinating. I haven't really looked into the MWGTOW thing. I generally don't pay much attention to subgroups of any kind, but this peaks my interest. It's weird to think that all the different archetypes throughout human history still exist in some form or another. It's not common to think of people as we were hundreds of years ago, or even thousands of years ago.
 
"I'm dissatisfied with dating, but I'm deep because I want to learn kung-fu. Damn hedonistic peons."

It's easier just to say you are a socially awkward weirdo with an ego issue, imo.
 
So basically he is saying unfuckable incels are actually this...
9Xmm20p.png

- yes this is an actual model GW released this month, albeit without the fedora -

Seriously chaps, whats the wise money on the nigger behind this idea being a massive 40k fanboy who is desperately trying to pretend that his perpetual virginity and repulsiveness actually proves he is a proto Space Marine?
 
And Mercutio was right!

:story: I hope that it is true. It is too rich
If you search around with your search engine of choice you'll find more than a few articles about it from the usual suspects that recently added being told "learn to code" as a right wing red flag/attack. Imagine being so fucking weak, both physically and character wise, that you think lifting weights is a bad thing that leads to "bad" conservative thoughts.
 
I'm going to opine that the article might have a point, but not how it intends.

So far as the MGTOW movement goes... I suppose I have a certain conceptual sympathy for it, but in practice I find most of it's adherents to be a nice inversion of the old Marxian standby... That is, I would never want to be part of a club that they were members of.

However.

As I look about me in the world, you know who I see most often have succesful, happy, healthy, long-lasting relationships? The people that feminists and millennial and SJWs and such have no use for. A lot of them are religious. A lot of them are gun owners. A lot of them have a physical element to their life outside of their career - they do woodsman-y, outdoorsy stuff, or they work out, or they have some sport they participate in regularly as a hobby. And yes, they're people who have reflected on why they are where they are and who they are... Not, perhaps, in a deeply philosophical, textbook sense of the word, but they're people who are not lost, emotionally and intellectually.

I don't think those people have all decided "Woo! Lets be modern day warrior-monks!". I do think, however, that the basic archetype of a fit, reasonably independent, emotionally and intellectually stable and secure person who is secure enough in who and what they are to essentially ignore the cultural winds of the moment, is both an attractive archetype in mate selection, and tends to be the type of person well-suited to being in a relationship... or really is just all-around well suited for life, when you get right down to it.

Just my two shekels.
 
Sex as a motivation is a blip? Your motivation is still sex if you train swordsmanship to kill other men instead of learning to pitch woo if the end result is you fucking your choice of women.
 
I don't think those people have all decided "Woo! Lets be modern day warrior-monks!". I do think, however, that the basic archetype of a fit, reasonably independent, emotionally and intellectually stable and secure person who is secure enough in who and what they are to essentially ignore the cultural winds of the moment, is both an attractive archetype in mate selection, and tends to be the type of person well-suited to being in a relationship... or really is just all-around well suited for life, when you get right down to it.
Yeah, NEET incels have never and will never be attractive or successful either personally or socially. But a guy who decides, fuck it I'm going to have a job, support myself, and do what I like, even if it involves no one else, might find contentment with themselves.

Honestly it seems like a lot of neet-dom is defined by self-hatred as much as it is about hating Stacy.
 
Is this really incels, or actually just the left reeing about dem dirty maga hat chads?

I just can not see incels doing any martial arts or weightlifting, just swinging a wooden katana once a week for 5 minutes on youtube.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo