GamerGate Events and Discussion

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Ver archivo adjunto 8719
Apparently the SJWs are at each others throats and Mojo Jojo 1 is one of the reasons. I wanna believe, but after everything thats happened this week I'm skeptical.
Considering how quick those cockbiscuits are willing to cannibalize each other over the smallest of thing (whether they're legitimate points or not), I think it's entirely possible. Just like every other group of people you have sub-groups and sub-groups of sub-groups. It comes as no surprise that they would fight over which group of people is more privileged/under-privileged (i.e. "Trans-nigger, bisexual, genderfluid, whale-kin are the most discriminated against!!" "What!? one of my headmates is a pansexual, former-life-indian princess, polyamorous, plankton-kin!11!! CHECK YOUR FUCKING PRIVILEGE YOU PREDATORY TRUSCUM PATRIARCHAL OPPRESSOR!!!). They also hate, and I mean hate it when somebody, and it doesn't matter who, so much as even suggests the anyone who isn't a straight, white, male is capable of committing evil.
 
Confirmed beyond reasonable doubt.

http://theralphretort.com/confirmed-dyson-reject-gawker-bullies-ceases-sponsorship/

B14DC-DIAAAi8Ru.png:large
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Considering how quick those cockbiscuits are willing to cannibalize each other over the smallest of thing (whether they're legitimate points or not), I think it's entirely possible. Just like every other group of people you have sub-groups and sub-groups of sub-groups. It comes as no surprise that they would fight over which group of people is more privileged/under-privileged (i.e. "Trans-nigger, bisexual, genderfluid, whale-kin are the most discriminated against!!" "What!? one of my headmates is a pansexual, former-life-indian princess, polyamorous, plankton-kin!11!! CHECK YOUR FUCKING PRIVILEGE YOU PREDATORY TRUSCUM PATRIARCHAL OPPRESSOR!!!). They also hate, and I mean hate it when somebody, and it doesn't matter who, so much as even suggests the anyone who isn't a straight, white, male is capable of committing evil.
I'd normally be quick to agree, but for the sake of argument - and fairness - let's hear them out. I agree very strongly with Smoked Sausage.

And here, I'll explain why:

Bear in mind, a lot of the so-called SJWs are relatively young people. Often in their teens, just establishing an identity for themselves, wanting to be good people, and winding up in a weird place not through malice, but through act of simply not knowing any better. We know this from the rather touching tale of the guy who got doxxed by one, managed to find his doxxer, discovered she was a 16-year-old girl just trying to be a decent activist, and subsequently causing her to realize that the person she had just inadvertently doxxed was, in fact, a person. A lot of people who embrace the likes of the so-called SJWs enter with good and even great intentions. This mindset can get installed very surreptitiously and it takes actual introspection - or a personal awakening - to get out of it. I know from my own scuffles on DailyKos that whilst many of the so-called SJWs are miserable fiends who blindly obey what they're told, others can be reasoned with, and can even be willing to talk like adults when engaged in a less-confrontational standpoint. You have to understand that whilst a lot of them are big on the "our way or fuck off" mentality, a lot of them also realize that this isn't how life actually works, and when taken away from the group and talked to like people, they become dozens of times more reasonable.

It's very important to remember that Tumblr and Twitter culture encourage the dogpile. This is why it's pretty much a standard-issue attack vector for many of them, and why the likes of say, Vade's cronies were quick to fuck off when directly confronted in an environment where everyone wouldn't immediately hop on-board with their victimhood and attack their intended target. When removed from such a location, where they don't feel they need to worry about being dogpiled, nor the need to dogpile themselves, that they open up somewhat. Not all of them are extremists. Not all of them are crazy otherkin or cultural marxists. Several, even many of them are, but not the majority.

I will bet cash money right now that at least 50% of the so-called SJW community would be completely against what Anita Sarkeesian posts if they thought for a nanosecond they could criticize her without the herd chewing on them like a pack of angry fish.

A lot of them mean well, even if they're ultimately being used.

And that last part, I feel, is the most important part: They're starting to realize that they're being used. And they aren't pleased. Whilst a lot of them cheerfully act as attack vectors for team Mojo Jojo, a lot of them do possess critical thinking skills and are some pretty damned sharp people. We figured out ages ago that the bulk of team Mojo Jojo were professional con-artists and charlatans, but in the so-called SJW community, this is a dark side that many of them never wanted to face.

Many of them believe strongly in social justice - the actual kind, not the kind that we resoundingly mock here on the Kiwi Farms - and were simply dragged along for the ride by the extremists and ideologues that are trying to profit. If they're willing to open up dialogue, welcome them, without hostility. Discourse as a whole is the very antithesis of what the likes of the corrupt Journos and team Mojo Jojo want, because if their own camp turns against them, there will be hell to pay.
 
So... I'm not really sure what commentary to offer on this piece, other than "uh oh".

The Good (and the Bad) of Twitter's New Bid to Stop Harassment
The company has granted moderating superpowers to a tiny feminist nonprofit. But shouldn't it be taking more drastic steps to protect its users?

Friedman [WAM's executive director] sees the problems facing [twitter] —and its reluctance to spend money—as endemic to most contemporary social networks.

“I see this as a free speech issue,” Friedman said. She said she knew some would see the work WAM does as “censorship,” but that a completely open and unmoderated platform imposes its own form of censorship. It effectively prevents women, especially queer women and women of color, from getting to speak on the service.

Part of the reason I'm mentioning this admittedly off-topic event is because the Gamergate wikipedia article has already been updated to include this.
 
So... I'm not really sure what commentary to offer on this piece, other than "uh oh".

The Good (and the Bad) of Twitter's New Bid to Stop Harassment




Part of the reason I'm mentioning this admittedly off-topic event is because the Gamergate wikipedia article has already been updated to include this.
Wow, they really didn't learn from the last first attempts.

You'd think someone would introduce them to a primer on how the Streisand Effect works, but you'd be wrong.
 
Wow, they really didn't learn from the last first attempts.

You'd think someone would introduce them to a primer on how the Streisand Effect works, but you'd be wrong.

This is kind of problematic actually. You know the kind of petty shit these types of people consider to be "harassment". I'm almost completely certain they're going to abuse this against us.
 
This is kind of problematic actually. You know the kind of petty shit these types of people consider to be "harassment". I'm almost completely certain they're going to abuse this against us.

You really think they can do anything to blunt 30,000+ Tweets a day? From a coalition as broad as this one? You think anyone's not going to cry foul if they try?

They tried that shit on Reddit, and look what happened - a giant groundswell in support. They tried it on countless forums, and the result was the same. They tried it on 4chan and it went over about as well as an abortion in the middle of a Disney movie, and spawned 8chan in the process. We've long gone past the point where they can President Madagascar this thing without anyone noticing.

Gamergate is now to scandals what Doge is to memes; any attempt to actively kill it only makes it stronger. wow
 
I wonder if we can use WAM for ourselves. Plenty of women on our side get harassment and threats.

Of course, that's assuming they aren't just going to ignore us because we're GG supporters.
I say go for it. Force them to show the extent of their character.
 
Brianna Wu is now advocating harassment. Wonder if we can use this.

88f.png


Also something nice.

5cb284736b.jpg
I really don't know what's worse; The fact that she's openly advocating harassment, or the cockbiscuits that are going to defend her idea as a way to "get even" with the all the patriarchal shitlords that supposedly oppress them.
 
Última edición:
So... is there any proof at all that adult women are now suddenly the largest group of gamers?
I'm guessing she's counting the likes of Anita as in "I've never played a vidya game in my life but I bitch about them constantly so totally a gamer grrrrrrl!"

Also:
tumblr_nepezqQe7i1u2l2ppo1_1280.png

Y'know, just in case the "bring back bullying" wasn't moronic enough, now they're defending a shameless child abuser/rapist!
 
However, what the Mojo Jojo's forget is that the games these adult women play often never get out of the realm of Candy Crush Saga, Angry Birds and WiiSports. Hardly the kind of games they're targeting...

One of the Mojo Jojos sees that this fact cannot be ignored, so she seeks to exapnd the definiton of what a gamer is. It's the equivalent of calling a person who writes a couple of words on a note "an author".
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo