Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Is there a sauce on it being "recovered memories" anywhere? Even the X-Files ultimately decided recovered memories were bogus.

A golem made of garbage was more believable.
 
https://af-mg.com/2018/09/17/breaki...oreclosure-case-guess-whos-mom-was-the-judge/

Breaking News tonight from one of America First Media’s best Deep Researchers Larry Beach.




Larry Beech@Larry_Beech


Folks...Christine Ford's mom (Paula k blasey) and dad (Ralph G Blasey) we're defendants in a foreclosure case in Maryland in 1996. Guess who the judge was?

Martha G Kavanaugh, mother of Brett Kavanaugh.

You can't make this $hit up
1f609.png


9:50 PM - Sep 16, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy




Christine Ford’s Parents Paula K Blasey and Ralph G Blasey were the Defendants in a foreclosure case in Maryland in 1996. Guess who the Judge was America? None other than Brett Kavanaugh’s mother, Martha G Kavanaugh. You literally cannot make this up.

The list of coincidences continues, we’re sure this is just another one of those instances. We’ll let you decide as we keep bringing you the truth America!




Larry Beech@Larry_Beech

· 12h

Folks...Christine Ford's mom (Paula k blasey) and dad (Ralph G Blasey) we're defendants in a foreclosure case in Maryland in 1996. Guess who the judge was?

Martha G Kavanaugh, mother of Brett Kavanaugh.

You can't make this $hit up
1f609.png



Larry Beech@Larry_Beech


It appears there was an ongoing judgement starting at least in 1990....7 c cases culminating in a foreclosure case in 1996, for which Martha Kavanaugh was the judge. There was also a 1982 contract case but I can't determine the details there.

10:20 PM - Sep 16, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy







Larry Beech@Larry_Beech

· 11h

Replying to @Larry_Beech
It appears there was an ongoing judgement starting at least in 1990....7 c cases culminating in a foreclosure case in 1996, for which Martha Kavanaugh was the judge. There was also a 1982 contract case but I can't determine the details there.


Larry Beech@Larry_Beech


Her father appears to have been an attorney...tons of cases referencing that. His relationship professionally with Kavanaugh should be looked I as well. There's more to this story than originally appeared.

10:23 PM - Sep 16, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy







Larry Beech@Larry_Beech

· 11h

Replying to @Larry_Beech
Her father appears to have been an attorney...tons of cases referencing that. His relationship professionally with Kavanaugh should be looked I as well. There's more to this story than originally appeared.


Larry Beech@Larry_Beech


It's not so much the disposition of a single case but that there is a lot more going on behind the scenes regarding connections between the blaseys and Kavanaugh than has been yet revealed.

10:46 PM - Sep 16, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy




Here’s a screen shot of one of the Court Dockets below.

kavanaugh1.jpg


kavanaugh2.jpg

Appears to be some family history between them. Trying to archive the article, but I keep getting an error.

Edit: Just adding more stuff to this post.

Rising Serpent is retweeting a few things

DnTZr-TU0AEytmP.jpg:large
 
Última edición:
Thanks to a link posted on the Drudge Report, I spotted another article about students who gived grades to Christine Blasey Ford. https://news.grabien.com/story-somethings-wrong-her-christine-fords-students-savage-her-rev

And there was some ratings from the website Rate My proferssors saved under the name Christine Ford.
https://web.archive.org/web/2018091...emyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1352705
http://archive.is/QuvgT
The helpfulness ratings on those good and bad coments wow
 
If the Dems get away with this every single right of center politician will be hit with 35+ year old sexual misconduct allegations that are impossible to verify.
 
@Ruin

Which is why it won't work.... everyone's got something in thier past they aren't proud of, when there's no distinction between making a drunken pass at a girl at a party and driving drunkenly off a bridge in a car with one as your passenger, then nobody becomes electable, or rather, everyone does as there's no way to appropriately weigh bad behavior if all crimes are equal.

But the dems are stupid enough to try it, because they're so full of raging Trump-hate they can't see 4 seconds down the road, let alone 4 years, this whole hearing has been derailed because they themselves lowered the bar for confirmation so they could appoint whoever they wanted when they controlled congress, sure that demographic shift meant what's happening right now, the reps appointing whoever they want, was impossible....
 
Última edición:
Funny how only right now have the Democraps pulled this bitch out of their ass. It reminds me more of the convenient Roy Moore accusation.

This is even more obvious b/c 3 minutes of research will show Feinstein has sat on this info since July. Bonus points for being laughed at by the FBI when she forwarded the letter to them last week.
 
"Let's go back to the scene of the crime!"
"We don't have one."
"Okay. Gather the witnesses."
"We just have one. He says it didn't happen."
"Well, were the two people in the same area at the same time?"
"We're not sure. We don't have an exact date or location."
"Fine. Let's bring the accuser in to testify under oath."
"We don't want to do that."

Are they serious with this? I thought what they tried to pull with Roy Moore was idiotic, but this is some next-level bullshit that ought to be outright illegal. It is absolutely disgusting that someone could work their ass off for their entire lives and make it all the way up to being a nominee for the Supreme Court just to have their entire life and career completely dismantled and permanently stained just because a couple of dust-belching skeletons have decided to panic because nothing else that they tried managed to stick.

After that catastrophic shit-fit they created during the hearings where we heard one baseless, idiotic accusation after another, are we really supposed to believe that this round of outrage and moral shock is genuine and based on a legitimate accusation?
 
If the Dems get away with this every single right of center politician will be hit with 35+ year old sexual misconduct allegations that are impossible to verify.

Hate to break it to you, but we passed that point with Roy Moore...

It doesn't matter that Moore was a terrible candidate who likely would've lost on his own. The lefties only see the results:

They used a woman with a history of mental illness spouting off an unverifiable accusation from decades ago with no proof (And later with "Proof" that she forged) to turn the entire election into a circus that they eventually won, with no negative consequences.

And now we have a mentally ill woman spouting unverifiable accusations from decades ago with no proof, taking aim at Kavanaugh. It's not a coincidence.

This is why they're doubling down so hard on "Me Too" even though it's cost them a HUGE financial backer (Weinstein). They can use it to get around that pesky "Due Process" and "Burden of proof" stuff.

An accusation like this would normally get a response of "This is a very serious allegation. We need to see some evidence". But now, due to Listen and Believe, it's turned onto the accused with "This woman says you groped her 10 years ago. Prove you didn't."

It's absolute nonsense that's only gonna get worse until it backfires and one of these false accusers face some serious legal consequences. But that's not happening because it's almost impossible to find evidence that they're faking it.

It's a bad situation.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo