Culture Even San Francisco Mayor sick of hobos - You gotta work hard to piss this guy off

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...ing-homeless-population-i-dont-stand-for-that

After years of complaints, San Francisco Mayor Mark Farrell vowed on Friday to become more aggressive in clearing the city’s sidewalks of homeless encampments.

Farrell told the San Francisco Chronicle: “Enough is enough. We have offered services time and again and gotten many off the street, but there is a resistant population that remains, and their tents have to go.”
He added, “We have moved as a city from a position of compassion to enabling (unacceptable) street behavior, and as mayor I don’t stand for that.”

The city has faced a growing homeless epidemic, and with that has come streets filled with human feces, dirty syringes, and trash. Farrell says “the tents are a public safety hazard for the people living in them, and for the residents of San Francisco.

Fucking finally.
 
“We have moved as a city from a position of compassion to enabling (unacceptable) street behavior, and as mayor I don’t stand for that.”
I hope this position expands to include other nuttiness. This is a great start and I'm glad someone finally stepped up to do something about it.
 
This is clearly an attempt by the hookers and pimps of San Francisco to garner more sidewalk space for themselves.
 
IIRC hobos are travelling workers. Tramps and bums are closer to this.
autistic I know but I read up on it a while ago
 
You know things are bad when even progressives are throwing around words like “enabler.”
 
I'm guessing he finally noticed the hobo tent set up in his own office, and the panhandlers in the elevator, and the guys shitting in the hall and blaming it on aliens.....


I'm happy though, because it appears, against all odds, you can make a liberal UNWOKE.... astounding.
 
All the white tech troons and their orbiter are going to be protesting the cops cleaning up the homeless tents, you fucking watch. Insufferable San Franciscans will ruin any sensible plan to improve the city.
 
There's a long hallway in the Powell Street BART Station where there are consistently homeless people taking naps. It's seriously like naptime in preschool, except it's smelly grown-up dudes instead of children and it goes on damn near 24/7. Rainy weather makes it even worse, intensifying the piss smell even more. And it gets weirder because near the end of said hall there is usually a person or group of people playing music on instruments. So you're just walking through a piss-scented haze of mental instability and hopelessness with some kind of (usually calm or serene) live music playing in the background.

San Francisco definitely deserves some of the (figurative, not literal.) shit it gets, but not stuff like this. These homeless people will also use BART and start leaking out into other places in the Bay Area as well. There are VERY LARGE encampments of homeless people in other places as well. The entirety of the Bay Area needs to help combat this, but finally seeing some pushback from the heart of the bay itself is encouraging.
 
Just start if off around 2:00 if you want to get to the homeless camps. This is the shining beacon of culture that the progressive elements in California have created and consistently refused to address in any meaningful way.

If you haven't seen Los Angeles for awhile, the state of that city even at the end of 2016 is pretty shocking, so I shudder to think how bad it's gotten since then. All of my memories of the city are back from when it wasn't exactly pristine, but it at least wasn't an open-air asylum. It consistently seems like that entire city and every major metropolis in California just has a death wish, but seeing any action from their government to try and acknowledge the problem for once is encouraging, even if it's more likely than not to fail horrendously.

They somehow managed to shoot down that "safe injection site" bill in their Senate, Now if we could only get them to shelf that absolutely ridiculous wet house idea, we might be getting somewhere.
 
Última edición:
They apparently can't take down the tents unless there's a bed on offer in a shelter. And right now the waiting list is over 1,000 for people who WANT to go into shelters.

I'm guessing there's not gonna be much in the way of pee and poop reduction any time in the near future. As much as I snark on Cali generally and SF in particular, I don't have a fucking clue what can be done about this myself. Short of Dickensian workhouses, and who the hell wants that?

Mayor Plans to Enact Pointless Tent Encampment Measure

Farrell plans to break up tent encampments while 1,047 unhoused people sit on S.F.’s shelter bed waitlist.


Mayor Mark Farrell at a press conference Monday, April 23, 2018 (Photo: Kevin Hume)



A plan put forth by San Francisco’s Acting Mayor Mark Farrell this week seeks to clear the city’s sidewalks of homeless tent encampments — but falls short on offering them anywhere to go.

At a press conference Monday, Farrell announced that he would start implementing Proposition Q — which bans tents on sidewalks — “in a more aggressive way.” Under Prop. Q, city agencies have the authority to take down tent encampments if those living there have a 24-hour warning and a shelter bed made available for them. Farrell lead the charge to get the proposition on the November 2016 ballot — notably with a handy $49,999 donation from tech mogul Ron Conway. It passed 52-48.

“You can offer services, you can offer shelter and housing to people and at a certain point, as a city we need to draw the line and say ‘this is a service-resistant population, we need to take down those tent encampments because they are unhealthy for the entire city of San Francisco’,” Farrell said.

It’s a powerful narrative but falls painfully short on fact. As of this morning, 1,047 people were listed on the city’s waiting list for shelter beds, which proves that although there are thousands of people camping on our streets, many are trying to find other places to sleep at night. As it stands, there simply aren’t enough places to house them, even temporarily. And, S.F.’s current shelters come with fiercely strict rules — no pets, no huge carts of belongings, and if you get in but your partner doesn’t, too bad. For many, making the choice to live on the streets with loved ones and pets is preferable to losing even more than they already have.

This was glossed over by Farrell. When SF Weekly inquired as to whether any new resources would be made available for people living on the streets, Farrell cited the upcoming Navigation Center that will open on 13th and South Van Ness Avenue in a few months, and a newly-approved one set to open before the end of the year in the Bayview.

But, those two centers will only have 250 beds between them — and in the meantime, the Navigation Center at 1515 South Van Ness Ave, which has currently has 120 beds, is set to close in June. With 7,499 homeless people counted on S.F.’s streets last year, citing two Navigation Centers as a reason to destroy tent encampments is seriously downplaying the extent of the city’s homelessness population.

Offering radical solutions to our city’s homelessness crisis is not easy, however, and with only a handful of weeks left in office, Farrell appears to be taking the cheap way out, citing how “incredibly scary” tent encampments are for people living near them. “We have gone in San Francisco from a point of compassion on our streets to enabling street behavior, and from my point of view as mayor this is unacceptable,” Farrell said.

It’s a sad step away from former Mayor Ed Lee’s stance on homelessness, which we feared would fall apart after he died. Not one to shy away from creative means to addressing the crises on our streets, Lee was a champion for Navigation Centers, and made the ambitious promise to get 8,000 people off San Francisco’s streets by 2021.

In contrast, Farrell’s promises are vague.

“We’re building more capacity all the time,” he says. “This is not simply moving around from one neighborhood to the next. As we add capacity we’re actually doing that in our city budget. In the meantime, while we have capacity and we offer people shelter and housing we cannot allow them to keep on residing in tent encampments.”

But, we don’t have capacity. So in the coming weeks, if you witness residents of tent encampments being uprooted along Division Street and around the Mission District, don’t expect them to disappear.
 
Yeah allow me to neg this pozreception to these comments by the mayor. San Fransisco intentionally turned itself into one giant safe space for the rich and pampered and privileged instead of investing money into affordable housing and an actual sustainable job market for low income people, which ended up with everyone not in or near the 1% becoming hobos if they wanted to stay in the city.

They created this fucking hobo problem, and now instead of spending their ample fucking funds to make the city an actual goddamn city instead of one big liberal arts collage campus, they plan on further punishing the hobos by driving them even further into the margins, just so they can still pretend they live in utopia.

As far as im concerned the Hobos would be well within their rights to go full zombie apocalypse on that goddamn shithole if the city authorities try to push them out.
 
All the white tech troons and their orbiter are going to be protesting the cops cleaning up the homeless tents, you fucking watch. Insufferable San Franciscans will ruin any sensible plan to improve the city.
I'm curious if we'll see a similar attempt in Seattle, or in the shorter term a response from their people. Downtown Seattle is just as bad as San Francisco when it comes to homeless shanties.
 
Unfortunately, it has to get bad enough to spill into their yards for them to care.

As long as they can keep it in the parts of downtown they don't frequent, (i.e. all of them except the designated trendy artist/tourist district) there is no problem, they can pat themselves on the back for being an inclusive and welcoming city while the working schleps step in needles and feces.

Ironically, they're just re-creating Victorian London where squalor is accepted as how "those people" live, while still thinking conservative middle-class people are the ones who have the out-of-touch worldview, because unlike those red mongrels, we CARE! See? Says so right here in this editorial I penned from my thousand-dollar phone while shopping at the organic market!
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo