Bhalgaroth
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Jun, 2026
Telling this Foxtrot fag to calm down won't do anything, let it seethe.Calm down faggot.
Anyone that understands basic geography knows what we're on about.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Telling this Foxtrot fag to calm down won't do anything, let it seethe.Calm down faggot.
Multiculturalism doesn't work, multiethnicity can work, I think. If Sukhdeep wants to integrate and can prove that he can behave himself and respect the host nation, I think he can settle (assuming the host benefits from his presence, of course). China does this well, there's like 50 different ethnic groups native to the region that's now China (even if non-Chinese can't tell them apart - much like when I tried to explain Scottish/Irish/British sectarianism to a Chinese guy and he didn't get the racism aspect because we were all "white" and looked the same to him and our names sounded similar enough). They expect everyone to speak Mandarin and not just their own language, they can keep their old language and funny food and clothes and traditional festivals and religious practice in their private lives, but they're expected to be Chinese first and not close themselves off in enclaves. They've had problems with East Turkistan freaks joining ISIS and other Islamist nonsense and they don't tolerate it the way we in the Yookay and Yurop do, they send them for re-education and training and learning Mandarin so they can get a proper job and be part of the community instead of being isolated and recruited by jihadist faggots. People in the West are like "muh concentration camps" but what else do you do with them? They're not concentration camps, for a start, but they also can't deport them because they are born in China and have been there for generations, and they want them to be good productive citizens. Kind of like what Prevent is supposed to do, but doesn't. If (and it's a big "if") we can't deport people we should teach them to behave.This goes back to the lie of multiculturalism and racial/cultural universalism that claims all races and cultures are 100% equal and interchangeable. There is no magic soil that will allow you to pluck Sukhdeep from Dheli, drop him in Wyoming, and with enough time he will be just like any other heritage American who can trace his roots back to the Founding Fathers. Multiculturalism is a lie and a killer of nations. Eventually the various cultures will reach a critical mass and start to compete to become the dominant culture of the land.
Dumbass Bongland vernacular regarding Indians aside the entire purpose of using South-Asian is to deliberately obfuscate Indians from the conversation. When used at a distance (in the sense that you are not personally there dealing with pajeets) using the term South-Asian leads the [white] reader to think of the more palatable actual South Asians, such as Vietnamese, rather than Indians.When was this? Like 100,000 years ago?
I really don't care what the name for South Asia is, but most normal people call it South Asia these days. Everyone knows that Indian culture is vastly different to the cultures encompassing East Asian cultures like Japan and China.
Using the term South Asia to describe that part of the world doesn't mean anyone thinks Indian and Chinese people are similar. That is fucking retarded.
This hypothetical person is a retard and needs to look at a map.using the term South-Asian leads the [white] reader to think of the more palatable actual South Asians, such as Vietnamese, rather than Indians.
That is pretty much why the term exists. Most South Asians look just like Indians, so to be more 'accurate' the term 'South Asian' became a more common way to refer to people from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc. Instead of calling everyone Indian.I thought it was what you say to describe people from that subcontinent and you don't want to get into the weeds with "ACTUALLY SAAR I AM FROM PAKISTAN YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID". Kind of like "desi" as a catch-all term for pajeets. Which idk what it means, maybe it's short for "designated shitting street".
My sweet summer child. You think people aren't retarded?This hypothetical person is a retard and needs to look at a map.
South Asia = India and it's surrounding countries. Some of you guys are acting like people calling the subcontinent South Asia means we think Japan and India are the same, that's obviously not true.
Never respect their heritage. lol.That is pretty much why the term exists. Most South Asians look just like Indians, so to be more 'accurate' the term 'South Asian' became a more common way to refer to people from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc. Instead of calling everyone Indian.
You're talking to a jeet, bear that in mind.My sweet summer child. You think people aren't retarded?
Never respect their heritage. lol.
"Wait, it's all Yummy Food?"I'm sure you've heard the old chestnut about "America is a cultural melting pot", right?
I don't buy this. Even though Russia and China have worked hard (through """socialism""" to erase cultural differences, they're still very much present. Hell, Chechens have their own autonomous area, and that's very different from the typical south Russian city, and still very different from Tatarstan, and even more different from Yakutia... Chechens consider themselves Chechen before they consider themselves Russian.Multiculturalism doesn't work, multiethnicity can work
Here is the issue. As I explained Jeets have no claim to the term Asian on any level as they are a distinct culture that don't even live in Asia. Rather than choose an ethnic term that would accurately encompasses the ethnic groups of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh they instead lump themselves with in with east Asians by calling themselves "south asians" often shortened to "Asian" when convenient. Suddenly Paki/Jeet rape gangs are "Asians" using the typically well behaved ethnic groups as a buffer to hide their horrific crime ring and savage behavior. It is no difference then using the term "teens" in the US to downplay black youth crime (even then it would be way more accurate as they are actually teens).Using the term South Asia to describe that part of the world doesn't mean anyone thinks Indian and Chinese people are similar. That is fucking retarded.
Not those who live in the Himalayas. They have more in common with east and south east Asians than Jeets.Most South Asians look just like Indians
How about Desi then? They already use that term to describe Jeets and Jeet things.Instead of calling everyone Indian.
Never had that happen, and I've eaten ethiopian all across the globe. Might help that I greet them in amharic, or just order the normal dishes.I used to have one near my college and you'd walk by and it's just "we don't have that. we're out of that." 24/7. They're spiritually akin to jamacian resturaunts.
Not really, second generation immigrants tend to be much worse than first generation, yearning for their ethnic homeland roots or whatever, contributing nothing to western society while making it worse.Multiculturalism doesn't work, multiethnicity can work, I think. If Sukhdeep wants to integrate and can prove that he can behave himself and respect the host nation, I think he can settle (assuming the host benefits from his presence, of course)
Yeah I think that's unfair on the Japanese and Chinese and other Asians, there should be a more accurate term to describe South Asians/Subcontinentals that everyone uses.Paki/Jeet rape gangs are "Asians"
Desi is a term used mostly within the South Asian community. If whites adopted that term and it caught on then sure, why not.How about Desi then?
Yeah that is a method liberal governments use to obfuscate the narrative.When there is a crime ring of Sukhdeep Singhs in Canada they are all labeled as "Canadians
Same reason any government does: scab labour make line go up.Why does Canada allow so many Indians in their country? I find it strange, despite the resistance from Canadians, they continue to flood in.
Why do whites need to do it? South Asian was a product of Jeets and their defenders in the media, they didn't push Desi because they knew what they where doing by mixing Jeets with Asians. If you want the white man to name your people then you are getting stuck forever as Jeets.Desi is a term used mostly within the South Asian community. If whites adopted that term and it caught on then sure, why not.
Because Indians are vermin and flood every country that lets a single one of them in. Simple as.Yeah that is a method liberal governments use to obfuscate the narrative.
Why does Canada allow so many Indians in their country? I find it strange, despite the resistance from Canadians, they continue to flood in.
In South America there's no jeets, except for Guyana, that has almost half of its population jeetsThe scale of India means you can always find 1M streetshitters to move to literally any location on Earth. Something that the West fails to comprehend. To our detriment.