Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

So perhaps they (we) are seeking truth, because as you said, political expediency would be towards the other path.

Occam's razor and all.
Expediency for the American project certainly. However the Expediency I deride here is those who wish to blame it on [insert nefarious org here] so they can attribute another crime and further/finally justify action agaisnt it. Seeking a crime that finally sticks to the boogeyman, regardless of not even how true it might be, but how reasonably sure we can be of its truth.
And to answer your question, no I wouldn't be dissapointed, except for how much of other's time I would have wasted. I agree, that question is a good test.

You said you wanted both the death penalty for robinson and justice. Would you be dissapointed if these two were mutually exclusive?
Disappointed? No. That said, I fail to see a world in which that is true. Even if we accept that it was indeed a Mossad op with explosives in the lapel mic, an agent in the crowd with a handgun, or a second sniper, it is plenty clear thay Robinson had intended to kill Kirk. Even if it wasn't his bullet, he still fully intended for it to be, and thus some punishment is warranted.
 
I'm also ignorant to this one, sounds like more of #4 but I'd want to read the details, your description is too vague for me to speculate much about the simplest option.
Starts at 37:12

This a gorefree livestream of the event.

This covers too much ground to quickly comment on. I'd need to learn more about these lies. And maybe some of these people hated him or had a strained relationship or something else. "People are complicated and this is an unusual event" is the simple answer unless I learn of something very damning.
Yeah it's hard to put months worth of content to support that one, so I'll just give the freudian slip


5:48
 
[retard noises]
I appreciate the effort but I'm not going to autistically pore over everything like this, that's for you. I've already demonstrated why my simplest explanation is not the same as yours for the majority of points. This is as much as you'll get from 99% of people, I don't have time for this shit. If you want people to listen, bring compelling evidence from the start, piling more data on just makes you sound crazier.
 
I appreciate the effort but I'm not going to autistically pore over everything like this, that's for you. I've already demonstrated why my simplest explanation is not the same as yours for the majority of points. This is as much as you'll get from 99% of people, I don't have time for this shit. If you want people to listen, bring compelling evidence from the start, piling more data on just makes you sound crazier.
Yeah, that's why I'm not bothering responding to him anymore. He doesn't want to actually engage with anyone, he just wants to be right. That's why every time someone refutes any of his points he just keeps shifting the goalposts with an additional "uhm, acktuallllllly" or "I'm just asking questions!" Candace Owens and all of these conservative conspiracy people have brain-broken the schizos.
 
I appreciate the effort but I'm not going to autistically pore over everything like this

The important part of those videos are a 1 minute thing each. I timestamped the relevant parts. You spent as much typing that message as you could "pore over it".

That's why every time someone refutes any of his points

Name a point relating to the case that got refuted. There are points that I've taken on board.

Occam's razor doesn't work if you don't look at the evidence. The earth is at the center of the universe if you don't study the orbits of planets.
 
The important part of those videos are a 1 minute thing each. I timestamped the relevant parts. You spent as much typing that message as you could "pore over it".
Nigger I do not care. Didn't ask. I'll take another two minutes to call you a double nigger. I accept my ignorance in these areas, I didn't acknowledge it so you can educate me. You will never be taken seriously. Enjoy hemlock, Socratic child.
 
In some ironic twist Lemmingwiser had now convinced me that he's a glowie.

He posts just enough decent/informative stuff that it seems worth not banning him but he refused a containment/debate thread for alternate theories. He shits the thread in an almost dedicated, professional manner that makes the bait almost impossible not to take and is so irritating that I now activly ignore anything contrairian posted. And I'm someone who usually doesn't mind indulging in conspiratorial speculation.

We end up with pages of derailment and replies. When people vent their feelings via stickers he then fucking posts about getting stickers.

Like dude. Read the fucking room and start a schizo thread or something. People are begging you to stop derailing and shitting up the thread and you STILL post "hmmm... People are negrating me and calling me a retard when all I'm doing is politely pointing out XYZ"

Yes. Yes they are. It's ruining the thread and you know it. I refuse to believe that you're this much of a sperg and can only assume by your inability to take this "debate" elsewhere that you want this thread to be ruined, you want people to think you're so retarded that any potentially valid points you could make will be fought against, you clearly care more about yourself and your bullshit than anything else in this thread and Terry would have run over you without a second thought.

I'm even annoyed at myself for adding to the pile of off topic "debate lemmingwiser" posts. At this point Id rather wait extra for some other poster to post updates and accept the thread as slow than suffer through another page of retardation around this one fucking user.
 
The term is “pour over” like you are descending upon a book or other physical media you feel enthralled by like :really: and cocaine
Apologies, but I can't tell what's a joke and what isn't since people online are notoriously bad at spelling and grammar.
1784321091674.png
 
Without my effort, in my absence, what you'll have is a thread with no updates about the case, the occasional literally-who gravedancing example, and a 2 minute hate segment where people repeat the npc party line.

Prove me wrong.
The thread is dead because you keep shitting it up with retarded conspiracies. Every time someone discusses anything about the case you have to chime in with some schizophrenic nonsense. All you’ve done is convince me that you’re a glowie, or at least paid off by someone to muddy the waters. You’re not helping your side, you’re making your side look delusional.
 
Apologies, but I can't tell what's a joke and what isn't since people online are notoriously bad at spelling and grammar.
Ver archivo adjunto 9288017
wait I’m gonna research that

You are correct right away, according to Oxford. And who am I to argue with the English over English?

I will study this more because I never knew this

Edit two: “pore” doesn’t just refer to sponges or peoples skin. It means to a dive deep into something. I had not realized this common medical noun was also a verb.
 
Without my effort, in my absence, what you'll have is a thread with no updates about the case, the occasional literally-who gravedancing example, and a 2 minute hate segment where people repeat the npc party line.

Prove me wrong.

Someone else will take up the baton. Prove me wrong by taking your bullshit to a new thread.

Fuck off glowie.

Last engagement because at this point I'm just adding to the problem.
 
Jon Bray has publicized his proof that Charlie Kirk was killed with a Lebanese battery bomb in his wireless microphone.

 
Jon Bray has publicized his proof that Charlie Kirk was killed with a Lebanese battery bomb in his wireless microphone.

ezgif-304b12b2f03337b2.gif
You mean the microphone that was on the other side of his neck?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo